User talk:Sarefo

Welcome to my talk page :) To make this extra clear: Be kind. Assume good faith. I you cannot do that, this is not your place.

• older articles are in the archives: 1 2

RE: WP:SPI

Hello, Sarefo. You have new messages at Cabe6403's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Proposed deletion of Corinnoidea

The article Corinnoidea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources; not notable – see talk page for more detail.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

iNaturalist links

Hi, possibly another contentious issue: separate templates for links which are already in the taxonbar (like those to iNaturalist, Wikispecies, Wikimedia Commons) often get removed by editors on the grounds that they are redundant. So prepare your argument as to why the iNaturalist template should be added!

(I'm quite busy with non-Wikipedia stuff at present, so haven't really thought more about getting the spider species lists deleted). Peter coxhead (talk) 11:34, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

I'm adding these for those where there are actually photos. Which add strong value. The thing being that a random person looking for photos of a taxon won't know that one of the 10+ links in the taxonbar has these.

I actually removed the EOL, Wikispecies and WikiCommons ones because they are redundant (in the case of EOL because they're redundant and dead). Take your time with the species list, they shouldn't be a bother now that they're unlinked. Sarefo (talk) 22:35, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Badumna longinqua

I am on British Spider identification group on Facebook, the Spider Badumna longinqua is a recent introduction into Great Britain, the distribution section on this Spider needs editing to say this. A couple of years ago, I tried editing the page for the Midland Counties Railway, and was blocked from doing so, (incorrect Editing?) even though subsequently all My revisions turned out to be correct,and have been incorporated into that page, So obviously, I don't want to edit Badumna longinqua, in case I get accused of being incorrect again. Nigel Nigelwi (talk) 09:40, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

@Nigelwi: what's important is that there's a reliable secondary source that includes Britain. Fortunately, the World Spider Catalog now does, so I've updated the article. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:40, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

okay, thank you Peter. Nigelwi (talk) 07:56, 12 April 2026 (UTC)