User talk:Rochambeau1783

"The Apopka Chief" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Apopka Chief has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 5 § The Apopka Chief until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 21:50, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Political appointments of the second Trump administration

Hi Rochambeau1783 I found some pictures that need to be added to the page Stephen Miran: https://www.bruegel.org/people/stephen-miran Paul M. Dabbar: https://www.commerce.gov/about/leadership/paul-m-dabbar Jeffrey Kessler: https://www.commerce.gov/about/leadership/jeffrey-kessler Gary Andres: https://www.hhs.gov/about/leadership/gary-andres.html Harmeet Dhillon: https://www.justice.gov/crt/staff-profile/assistant-attorney-general Douglas Tulino: https://about.usps.com/who/leadership/officers/apmg-ceo.htm Olivia Trusty: https://www.fcc.gov/about/leadership/olivia-trusty I don't know how to Upload & I notest you know how to Upload pics. And I know how to find pics. Thanks:2600:1004:A031:B0A1:50D0:E8D3:65A0:3778 (talk) 01:11, 28 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Tim Sheehy Legislation

Hi Rochambeau1783, I noticed that you recently edited the Tim Sheehy article and thought you would be interested in my suggestions for the page. I know Tim personally so don't want to make these changes myself - if you agree with my edits, would you mind implementing them? Thanks! Clarkfork79 (talk) 13:11, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Trevor J. Bredenkamp" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Trevor J. Bredenkamp has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 2 § Trevor J. Bredenkamp until a consensus is reached. SuperWIKI (talk) 16:13, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hope Florida scandal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hope Florida scandal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hope Florida scandal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nemov (talk) 15:36, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Wells family

Hello, Rochambeau1783,

Thank you for creating Wells family.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article is very well constructed and written but I cannot find any real WP:SIGCOV on this family as a notable family in any quality independent source? thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 19:41, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Rochambeau1783. Thank you for your work on Volusia Sheriff's Office. Another editor, Demt1298, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing this article for Wikipedia. I am marking it reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Demt1298}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Demt1298 (talk) 23:31, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Killing of Charlie Kirk

Sorry I reverted your edit of Killing of Charlie Kirk. I didn't have a choice. Nice4What did a simultaneous edit with me and zapped my hard work, after I had carefully incorporated other editors' changes into my version. I will now attempt to restore your edit manually. Sorry for the inconvenience. —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:38, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No trouble at all. I apologize for the inconvenience. Rochambeau1783 (talk) 06:39, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody beat me to it. Your change is already back in. —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:39, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"The Sixties and Seventies" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Sixties and Seventies has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 5 § The Sixties and Seventies until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 09:07, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Post–World War II Era" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Post–World War II Era has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 5 § Post–World War II Era until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 09:09, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edan Alexander, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaza.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism

Anythingyouwant's edits at the Earle-Sears article were not "vandalism", and it was inappropriate for you to label them so. Please re-read WP:VAND and be especially careful with edit summaries, where you are unable to strike or remove comments. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Second Person of the United States" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Second Person of the United States has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 16 § Second Person of the United States until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 18:41, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

For talk page stalkers, please be notified of a sockpuppet investigation. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:56, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rochambeau1783. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

asilvering (talk) 04:40, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American real estate investors has been nominated for merging

Category:American real estate investors has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 21:51, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Sir Thomas Wells" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Sir Thomas Wells has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 6 § Sir Thomas Wells until a consensus is reached. Zzz plant (talk) 00:53, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Americo-pope" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Americo-pope has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 11 § Americo-pope until a consensus is reached. lp0 on fire () 13:06, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"CJK assassination" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect CJK assassination has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 3 § CJK assassination until a consensus is reached. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:44, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]