User talk:Renascitur

Friendly clarifying question for strikes on drug traffickers article

Hi Renascitur.

Question on yesterday's boat strike. Early albeit probably shaky reports suggested the survivor of the strike was captured. Just confirming that upon further review the survivor is in fact missing and presumed dead yes?

Just want to know so I can correct the info box. Thank you and good catch. (: Historyguy1138 (talk) 14:33, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Historyguy1138 yes they are still missing. No news/ announcements about them being located or rescued have been made Renascitur (talk) 14:43, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ah cool. I will wait a bit then for any updates on that then, but remove him from the captured section. Thanks. (: Historyguy1138 (talk) 15:07, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

March 2026

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mansoureh Khojasteh Bagherzadeh. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 22:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Timtrent. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mansoureh Khojasteh Bagherzadeh that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 22:43, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Azimio la Umoja, a link pointing to the disambiguation page United Democratic Party was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 12 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohamed Khadhar Ibrahim, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Judicial Service Commission was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:24, 9 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohamed Warsame has been accepted

Mohamed Warsame, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 04:51, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your sandbox

I edited your sandbox because it was listed in Empty headings, a kind of lint error. One day earlier, Zinnober9 edited your sandbox for the same reason. You reverted Zinnober9 and you reverted me, but then you removed the empty heading, which is good. There are many editors who fix things in Wikipedia including lint errors, CS1 errors, CS1 maintenance, and many other types of problems. If there is an error in a user page, people will tend to fix it. I try to respect requests to leave a specific user's user pages alone, but I get a lot of thanks and positive feedback for my user page edits, so it's generally well-received. I encourage you to help keep errors out of Wikipedia, including your user pages. For example, if you have markup like this ...

This line has '''unclosed bold
This line has <small>''misnested tags</small>''
[[File:Information icon.svg|centr|This information icon won't be centered because of the bogus file option "centr"]]

... and someone comes along and fixes the unclosed bold, the misnested tags, or the bogus file option, it's probably best to accept the change gratefully. Cheers, Anomalocaris (talk) 05:32, 24 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Anomalocaris I accept your kindness and intention to help, I am also aware that other Wikipedians can and have the ability to edit another user's sandbox. I also appreciate and thank you for leaving a kind, well explained reason on why you and user @Zinnober9 edited my sandbox. Renascitur (talk) 06:25, 24 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

June 2026

Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Laikipia Air Base, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 15:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Danners430 I'm adding the citations as we speak Renascitur (talk) 15:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Laikipia Air Base that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 15:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Renascitur to expand on the above - the comments you left in your edit summaries were, to put it very mildly, rather very cheeky. This is a community project, and you are expected to act in a WP:CIVIL manner towards all other editors.

You added an entire paragraph of content, and didn't add sources. Whether you were "in the process of" adding them or not - citations should have been added in the same edit as you added the content. That is why you were reverted - there is zero need to be rude about it in edit summaries. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 15:26, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Danners430 I dispute that I'm being rude in any way. Could you please cite where it states "citations should have been added in the same edit as you added the content." thanks Renascitur (talk) 15:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You made an edit adding content and didn't provide a source. It really is that simple. Per WP:Verifiability, one of Wikipedia's core policies, edits that introduce unsourced content may be reverted at any time. That is what happened. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 15:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Danners430 I am once again asking you to please cite "citations should have been added in the same edit as you added the content" if there is such a policy, which I was so far unaware of, I will gladly comply.

I did not come to Wikipedia to have arguments, engage in edit wars or disturb my peace of mind!

Also what are interpreting as" rudeness"? Renascitur (talk) 15:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've already pointed you at the policy. You made an unsourced edit and were reverted. If you make edits without giving sources, that is what to expect. As for where you were rude - see the edit summaries where you restored the content and again where you first added the sources. That is not how we treat other editors on Wikipedia, and as a fellow editor I'm expecting you to not repeat such behaviour. I consider this matter closed. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 15:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Danners430 no you haven't, please provide the source. Pointing out that I was already citing sources is not being rude. In all your previous statements I can't find anything that states "citations should have been added in the same edit as you added the content". Claiming that such a policy exists (and if it does I will gladly comply with it) is not citing it!

Are you deadass saying asking someone to chillux is rude?

Again, please link to it Renascitur (talk) 16:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Renascitur! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Knowing if a subject meets notability before writing an article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]