User talk:RT6HPU

Welcome!

Hello, RT6HPU, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

The Ritz Hotel, London

Since when can legal matters (if properly sourced) not be included in Wikipedia articles? This is news to me. Please elaborate. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 11:50, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to The Ritz Hotel, London, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:57, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Ritz Hotel, London, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

THIS IS A FACTUAL EVENT. HOW DARE YOU REMOVE IT. 81.99.240.92 (talk) 00:50, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at The Ritz Hotel, London, you may be blocked from editing. "Removed controversial content" is not an adequate reason to remove sourced content. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 12:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2026

Hello RT6HPU. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to The Ritz Hotel, London, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:RT6HPU. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=RT6HPU|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:43, 25 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]