User talk:Qwidjib0
nothing to see here Qwidjib0 (talk) 06:03, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
The article InterWorx has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable software. No evidence of in depth coverage in independent reliable secondary sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:43, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
The article InterWorx has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NSOFT. The current sources are not independent and/or do not contain SIGCOV. The most coverage I could find was a tiny paragraph in this book. Other than that, there's trivial mentions in some papers on GScholar.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:27, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InterWorx until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.