User talk:Pharmfdainfo

January 2023

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

• Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pharmfdainfo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Your proposed new abshishekgupta03 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

As I am new to wikipedia and wanted to provide the good quality article link where it needed. I know that my approach was wrong because i was not aware that how to do that but my intention was not wrong and in future it will not happen. So, Please unblock me with my new username and also provide me the informaation about how can I contribute in wikipedia with best quality article where dead link are present as per my stream (Pharmacy). Thankyou Pharmfdainfo (talk) 17:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — Voice of Clam (talk) 11:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

I suppose you don’t want “Your proposed new“ as part of the username? Tropicalkitty (talk) 17:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

What is your association with the website you linked to? 331dot (talk) 22:38, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

HI,

That website is mine. I write articles on pharmaceutical subjects. Pharmfdainfo (talk) 14:19, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

You won't be allowed to include links to your website. Blogs are not reliable sources because they are by definition self-published sources with no editorial review. We only accept content that is cited to sources with an established reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight (major news organizations, academic press, reputable publishers of books/magazines/newspapers). --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:34, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

With that in mind, what specifically do you intend to edit, if unblocked? SQL^{Query Me!} 20:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)