Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:
Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.
The key problem here is that we need independent sources that discuss the subject. It's not what the subject says (in interviews) or writes that matters. What matters hugely is what other independent people say or write about the subject, which is difficult for journalists, typically, compared to say football players. See WP:GOLDENRULE, we need 3 examples. One option is if the subject's music has been reviewed by independent sources. But it has to be about him, rather than the band.
Next steps
Edit Draft:Goran Andrijanić to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Hello, Pasta1985!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 11:30, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]