User talk:Nealgreenfield

please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#New_Legal_Threat_at_Talk:Gary_Null

thanks Roxy, the dog. barcus 22:00, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:12, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

a better way of raising concerns is to follow our terms of service

Since you've gone straight to legal bluster, is contact information for the Foundation. They can help you better than the editors here can. Wikipedia:Libel also is the way to go. Hope it all works out, but we cannot unblock you until the matter is settled.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:33, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Another editor has posted regarding your concerns at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Gary_Null, which is the correct course of action. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:35, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

May I also add, if you think Mr Barrett is disparaging your client, that you go and sue him? If, in a lawsuit, those writings were found to be beyond the pale, we might think twice before referencing him. As it is, most of the references to source 1 (by Mr Barrett) are uncontroversial. They cover topics such as PhD title, and place of study. These are fairly indisputable facts. As for the rest of the citations, they're clearly attributed criticisms of your client by Mr Barrett. Nowhere do we take what he says as indisputable fact. The only issue I could see was an unsourced "against scientific consensus". However, from some of the writings of your client, I think you would agree that such is the case - please see our policy the sky is blue. What remains is perhaps changing the balance of the article in accordance with undue weight. As has been pointed out, the biographies of living persons/Noticeboard is the correct place for such a discussion, if the talk page does not suffice. Also please note that you could still contribute to the discussions, if you request an unblock, and agree to uphold our policies on neutrality (see our conflict of interest guideline), and particularly no legal threats. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 00:30, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

@Dlohcierekim: The correct WMF legal team address would be legalwikimedia.org. That link goes to community-curated OTRS queue. — regards, Revi 19:12, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for that. Why is the wrong email on that page?<rhetorical>--Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:06, 27 March 2018 (UTC)