User talk:NAWEHA1

June 2025

Hello, I'm Knitsey. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sneako, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Knitsey (talk) 19:27, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Knitsey — thanks for reaching out.

You're absolutely right to emphasize verifiability. For the Sneako article, I’ve been working systematically to build each sentence using citations from reliable, secondary sources, and I’m in the process of replacing or removing any content previously supported only by self-published or deprecated sources. In some cases, I initially draft sentences with ^[1] placeholders until a solid RS is secured.

For the specific sentence you flagged, I’ll:

• Replace any unverifiable content with properly cited text

• Avoid non-RS sources like Patreon, Fandom wikis, or YouTube unless used strictly under WP:ABOUTSELF with no editorializing

• Re-add only what’s supported by reliable journalism, interviews, or direct self-attributions meeting RS standards

If I’ve misjudged any source or overlooked something specific, I’d appreciate a pointer — I’m committed to keeping the article aligned with WP:V, WP:BLP, and WP:RS.

Would it be helpful if I walked you through which citations are being confirmed for each section, or would you prefer I ping you once everything’s finalized?

Thanks again for your time and diligence. NAWEHA1 (talk) 08:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sneako has been reverted.
Your edit here to Sneako was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://ethnicelebs.com/sneako) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:39, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the note.

I understand that EthniCelebs is on the list of generally deprecated sources and I won’t be re-adding that link. However, I’d like to clarify that other Wikipedia pages—such as Hasan Piker or Andrew Tate—do cite YouTube interviews, tweets, and podcasts as sources, particularly when the statements are non-controversial, come directly from the subject, and fall under WP:ABOUTSELF.

In this case, I’m working on the Sneako article and am trying to verify basic biographical information (such as ethnicity, upbringing, or self-identification). Would it be acceptable to use Sneako’s own YouTube videos, X/Twitter posts, or podcast appearances, provided they are attributed clearly and used in accordance with policy?

Thanks again — I want to make sure I’m following the guidelines correctly and using sources as others have done in similar BLPs. NAWEHA1 (talk) 10:47, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(FYI, this is a bot and they can’t respond :).) GoldRomean (talk) 14:41, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh How can I differentiate between real persons and bots? I am new Here. NAWEHA1 (talk) 15:12, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, bots usually have “bot” in their name (like XLinkBot). And if you click on its username, you’ll see a notice saying “this user is a bot”. GoldRomean (talk) 15:14, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you master NAWEHA1 (talk) 15:49, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sneako, you may be blocked from editing. Time to seek the talk page. Drmies (talk) 21:51, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Drmies, thanks for the message. I'm new to editing Wiki and still learnin the guidelines with my mentor. I didn’t intend to be disruptive. I’m happy to take any advice you have on how I can contribute properly moving forward. NAWEHA1 (talk) 15:07, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sarsenet. An edit that you recently made to User talk:NAWEHA1 seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 04:09, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sarsenet, thanks for the message. I'm new to Wikipedia and still learning with my mentor GoldRomean. Thank you for the advice I will be more careful moving forward and contacting my mentor more often. Appreciate the guidance NAWEHA1 (talk) 15:05, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sneako

Hi, do you have any relation to Sneako? E.g. are you him, do you know him personally, did he ask you to work on his article? GoldRomean (talk) 22:16, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mentor, thanks for reaching out. I'm new to Wikipedia and still learning how to contribute properly. I want to be clear that I have no personal or professional connection to Sneako and I am not him. NAWEHA1 (talk) 15:01, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This sounds like a broken record. Drmies (talk) 17:44, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wdym? NAWEHA1 (talk) 19:22, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you choose to focus on this article, and only this article, to edit? GoldRomean (talk) 19:10, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm testing the waters as you could say. I trying to learn and I already learned a lot of policies like WP:RS and WP:BLP. NAWEHA1 (talk) 20:26, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm* NAWEHA1 (talk) 20:27, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ez Mil have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ez Mil was changed by NAWEHA1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.994486 on 2025-07-03T19:03:53+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:03, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) in Wikipedia pages without carefully reviewing them, such as those you made to Eminem, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. TeoTB (talk) 17:41, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), as you did at Eminem, you may be blocked from editing. TeoTB (talk) 06:46, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For context, NAWEHA1, your latest edit to Eminem (diff) introduced the following references, which appear to be made-up by AI as the links are not functional and no archived versions exist:

TeoTB (talk) 06:50, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, NAWEHA1!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, S0091 (talk) 21:36, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome, S0091! I'm still learning my way around Wikipedia and trying to follow the policies like WP:BLP and WP:RS. I appreciate the resources you shared — they’ve been really helpful so far. NAWEHA1 (talk) 21:39, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Rapture Tour moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2019 Rapture Tour. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 17:05, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Use of LLMs in articles

Hello, I'm Dwarfroe. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - dwarfroe (talk / contr) 01:59, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2019 Rapture Tour (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MCE89 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are still signs of clear AI-generated text and failed verification throughout the draft. To give one example, [1] does not support the claim Across seven shows performed in 2019, the tour grossed approximately $42.8 million, with the five Oceania dates accounting for about $34.9 million.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2019 Rapture Tour and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MCE89 (talk) 14:34, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NAWEHA1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MCE89 (talk) 14:34, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

^ [Add citation]

[1] [Add citation]

[1]