User talk:MuhammadKamran12

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Cruise missile. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:29, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bobby Cohn were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This looks like an introduction page for yourself meant for a userpage rather than article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:MuhammadKamran12/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 13:52, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MuhammadKamran12! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn (talk) 13:52, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello, I'm Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Enamel paint have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Take a look at our guidelines about external links. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Apparition¹¹ ^Talk/Contribs 10:34, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:MuhammadKamran12/sandbox

Hello, MuhammadKamran12. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:MuhammadKamran12/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2026

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 01:46, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, LNER Class A4, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 10:29, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Khera Dabar

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Khera Dabar, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:13, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

sources

Hi, I've noticed you've been doing various maintenance tasks and would like to thank you for this. I would like to alert you to the fact that some of the sources you have been adding are unreliable.

in this edit and this edit you use Wikipedia as a source, which is obviously not allowed - see WP:CIRCULAR
in this edit you add a as a source a random document on scribd. there is no indication as to who wrote the document or why we should consider to be reliable source

Please pay more attention to whether the references you are adding are reliable sources. Thanks, Morwen (talk) 12:06, 19 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

June 2026

Hello, I'm Gnomingstuff. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:17, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]