Jump to content

User talk:Mfjod

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination of Edvards Šlesers for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edvards Šlesers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edvards Šlesers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Bearcat (talk) 14:05, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Edvards Šlesers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edvards Šlesers. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Epsilon.Prota talk 21:38, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edvards Šlesers (June 14)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Epsilon.Prota, left the following feedback:
Per WP:G4

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Edvards Šlesers to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Epsilon.Prota talk 21:40, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, that article was deleted as the result of a discussion, so recreating it (especially with the exact same content) is disruptive. I recommend working on another topic, and returning to this one in the future if the sourcing improves (one reply noted WP:TOOSOON, which we often see in cases where a subject just hasn't yet received enough coverage to be featured here) ASUKITE 13:41, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mfjod! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Epsilon.Prota talk 21:40, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]