User talk:Marinheiro

Welcome!

Hello, Marinheiro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Simply south 12:42, 20 September 2007 (UTC) If belated.[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marinheiro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 89.214.146.83. I normally edit wikipedia using a UK based ISP (Andrews and Arnold), and have never been blocked using my UK address. I am currently in Portugal using MEO mobile internet on my usual laptop. I am not using any VPN. I am running Firefox on Linux with privacybadger, https everywhere, and consent-o-matic installed but no other addons. I have removed all wikipedia cookies and retried without success. If the problem is with the way MEO run their mobile internet, please let me know and I will stop trying to edit till I return to England. If the problem is only with my laptop I would appreciate any suggestions for why the diagnostics would think I am using a proxy (which I am not) so I can try to fix it. Thank you. Marinheiro (talk) 16:13, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That IP address is a confirmed P2P proxy. Yamla (talk) 17:40, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trust for History, Arts and Architecture of Pakistan has been accepted

Trust for History, Arts and Architecture of Pakistan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Xegma(talk) 06:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to approve the page! Marinheiro (talk) 20:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Marinheiro. Thank you for your work on THAAP. Another editor, SafariScribe, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this article. Keep it up! Kudos!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SafariScribe}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sajida Haider Vandal (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:BLP. Statements, starting with the date of birth, need to be sourced or removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sajida Haider Vandal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 07:52, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marinheiro! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 07:52, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sajida Haider Vandal

Hello, Marinheiro. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sajida Haider Vandal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:16, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sajida Haider Vandal has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sajida Haider Vandal. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:13, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Marinheiro/Sajida Haider Vandal

Hello, Marinheiro. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Marinheiro/Sajida Haider Vandal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sajida Haider Vandal (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I think Vandal may well pass WP:NPROF, bt there are referencing problems. All inline links should be removed, please, and turned into references if appropriate, Wikilinks, or external links in a section so named. See Wikipedia:External links. There should be no links pointing to external sources until those in the 'References' section (with the exception of one optional link in any infobox).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Marinheiro/Sajida Haider Vandal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 23:26, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sajida Haider Vandal (March 25)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Nighfidelity, left the following feedback:

This draft reads like a resume or curriculum vitae. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a professional networking website or a place to promote yourself or your services. We also strongly discourage writing about yourself.

Articles about people must meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

possibly passes WP:NACADEMIC, but the promotional tone needs to be altered.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Sajida Haider Vandal to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Nighfidelity (talk) 19:36, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thanks for looking at the Sajida Haider Vandal page. I have come to the conclusion that although she is a widely known person (notable in a general sense) there is just not enough material available about her in English to satisfy wikipedia's criteria, and there is no sense in my trying again. Maybe one day someone will put together an Urdu page, but that is completely beyond my capabilities. Marinheiro (talk) 10:00, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]