Jump to content

User talk:Mads Rivers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ryan Lively has been accepted

[edit]
Ryan Lively, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saad Bhamla (December 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ldm1954 were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There has been a minor improvement since the last version. However, it still has too much WP:Peacock and does not meet WP:NPROF.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ldm1954 (talk) 14:53, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Understood. Do you suggest improve or abandon for a while and return in a couple of years? Trying to gauge if fixable or no-go? Mads Rivers (talk) 15:08, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mads Rivers! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ldm1954 (talk) 14:53, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David W. Flaherty (June 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No sources cited at time of review
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~Liancetalk 21:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
fixed - thanks! Mads Rivers (talk) 11:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Filler (June 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No sources cited at time of review
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~Liancetalk 21:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
fixed - thanks! Mads Rivers (talk) 11:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victor Breedveld (June 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No sources cited at time of review
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~Liancetalk 21:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
fixed Mads Rivers (talk) 11:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nga Lee (Sally) Ng (June 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~Liancetalk 21:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
fixed Mads Rivers (talk) 11:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andreas S. Bommarius (June 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~Liancetalk 21:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
fixed Mads Rivers (talk) 11:55, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dennis W. Hess (June 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~Liancetalk 21:37, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
fixed Mads Rivers (talk) 11:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mads Rivers. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More

[edit]

You have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below:

  • When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
  • You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
  • There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
  • You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. If you are writing about yourself, or someone you know as a friend, colleague, client, employer or relative, you have a conflict of interest, and you must disclose the nature of that COI.

I would have thought it was obvious that someone's own papers aren't independent third-party sources, and shouldn't be used as refs. They should just be listed as Publications with no further reference. Similarly, interviews and their own GIT pages aren't suitable. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victor Breedveld (June 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Filler (August 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
C F A 💬 16:06, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David W. Flaherty has been accepted

[edit]
David W. Flaherty, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Andreas S. Bommarius

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mads Rivers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andreas S. Bommarius, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Victor Breedveld

[edit]

Hello, Mads Rivers. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Victor Breedveld".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:12, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Michael Filler

[edit]

Hello, Mads Rivers. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Michael Filler".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:24, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Mads Rivers. Thank you for your work on Oded Rechavi. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Currently no evidence of notability with a weak h-factor and only junior awards.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 00:55, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

lol - they have the schmidt polymath award - similar to the macarthur award. Mads Rivers (talk) 06:14, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Schmidt Science Polymath, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Isaidnoway (talk) 06:11, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oded Rechavi moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Oded Rechavi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and His h-factor is weak, and the awards are all junior. The recent edits have not addressed this.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:21, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Oded Rechavi has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Oded Rechavi. Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 07:24, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moore Inventor Fellows (April 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cinder painter was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
it's better expand the Moore Inventor Fellows page with this award
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cinder painter (talk) 10:20, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marta Hatzell (April 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 11:18, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PRX Life (April 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 12:32, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Mads Rivers. Thank you for your work on Michelle Gaines. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Sorry, but an assistant professor with an h-factor of 7 and no major awards is many years away from passing the criteria for an academic page on Wikipedia. Please wait, she needs to achieve far more.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 22:17, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Gaines moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Michelle Gaines. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and not notable, too soon. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:17, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Michelle Gaines has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michelle Gaines. Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 22:18, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Michelle Gaines has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michelle Gaines. Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 22:18, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Sponberg moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Simon Sponberg. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and a clear case of WP:TOOSOON. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 16:35, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Simon Sponberg has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Simon Sponberg. Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 16:39, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schmidt Science Polymath (June 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HerBauhaus was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Thanks for your draft. It covers a potentially notable topic, but right now it doesn’t meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines (see WP:GNG and WP:THREE). Most of the sources are either connected to the program or are announcements, which count as primary. The MIT News article is a solid independent source, but you’ll need a few more from outside outlets that offer deeper coverage of the program. A couple of the listed sources are also dead links. If you find more independent sources, feel free to update and resubmit.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
HerBauhaus (talk) 14:09, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Droplet Superpropulsion has been accepted

[edit]
Droplet Superpropulsion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bryan MacKinnon (talk) 09:42, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Moore Inventor Fellows

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mads Rivers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moore Inventor Fellows, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:PRX Life

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mads Rivers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:PRX Life, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Michelle Gaines

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mads Rivers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michelle Gaines, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Simon Sponberg

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mads Rivers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Simon Sponberg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Moore Inventor Fellows

[edit]

Hello, Mads Rivers. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Moore Inventor Fellows".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:26, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Marta Hatzell

[edit]

Hello, Mads Rivers. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Marta Hatzell".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:25, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Michelle Gaines

[edit]

Hello, Mads Rivers. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Michelle Gaines".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 22:25, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Schmidt Science Polymath

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mads Rivers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Schmidt Science Polymath, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Simon Sponberg

[edit]

Hello, Mads Rivers. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Simon Sponberg".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:26, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eberhard Neumann (December 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The sources are primary and cannot therefore establish notability per WP:GNG, and it isn't clear how this would satisfy WP:NPROF either?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:22, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{AFC comment|1=Thank you for the review.
I have revised the draft to specifically address your comment by adding multiple independent, secondary sources that discuss Neumann’s contribution within the context of the field. In particular:
A review in Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering describes the medical application of electroporation as beginning with the “seminal” 1982 work by Neumann and colleagues, and notes that the term “electroporation” was coined/first used by that group in 1982 (Yarmush et al., 2014).
A review chapter in Advances in Genetics states that Neumann and colleagues first demonstrated plasmid transfection of mammalian cells by electroporation in 1982 (Young & Dean, 2015).
The draft already includes an independent historical overview in Nature Methods describing Neumann as an early pioneer in the field (Eisenstein, 2006), as well as later review coverage (e.g., Stewart et al., 2018).
I also added sourced information on professional recognition/leadership (elected EMBO membership; chair role in the German Biophysical Society) to better align with WP:NPROF criteria.
thanks, Mads Rivers (talk) 16:40, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eberhard Neumann (December 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 17:01, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{AFC reply|1=Thanks for review.
This submission is intended to meet the subject-specific academic notability guideline (WP:NACADEMIC / WP:NPROF), which is an alternative to WP:GNG.
I revised the draft to document that Eberhard Neumann satisfies multiple academic criteria, including:
1. Elected member of a highly selective scholarly society: Neumann is listed as an EMBO Member (elected 1980).
EMBO membership is by election and recognizes outstanding achievements in the life sciences. (Sources: EMBO People directory; ETH Zürich description of EMBO membership election.)
2. Leadership of a major scholarly society: Neumann served as Vorsitzender (chair/president) of the German Biophysical Society (DGfB), and IUPAB lists DGfB as Germany’s adhering body and national society for biophysics. (Sources: DGfB Rundschreiben 1/2004; IUPAB DGfB member listing.)
Independent secondary sources are also used in the body to support the historical/scientific context of his contributions (e.g., secondary reviews of electroporation), while institutional sources are limited to routine biographical facts.
If you still feel WP:NACADEMIC is not satisfied, could you point at which criterion is not met? I can further revise as necessary -- thanks for the feedback } Mads Rivers (talk) 23:13, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monica Daley has been accepted

[edit]
Monica Daley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nil🥝 14:29, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dennis Hess has been accepted

[edit]
Dennis Hess, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ldm1954 (talk) 03:43, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

December 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jlwoodwa. An article that you recently made, Moore Inventor Fellowship, seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. In particular, you should check each citation, and fictitious references must be removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:48, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marta Hatzell (January 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
She is right at the edge of notability in terms of her citations, WP:NPROF#C1. Unfortunately her awards are all relatively junior ones, not the major peer awards we expect a notable academic to have. Based on the strong rate of increase in her citations I think she will pass NPROF in 1-2 years. However, IMHO it would be unfair on others to pass her now. Keep a copy and check again in a year.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ldm1954 (talk) 12:28, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
understood - will do. Thanks. ~2026-98257 (talk) 17:45, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schmidt Science Polymaths Program (January 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MelbourneIdentity were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MelbourneIdentity (talk) 16:01, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eberhard Neumann has been accepted

[edit]
Eberhard Neumann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ldm1954 (talk) 18:03, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Mads Rivers. Thank you for your work on Eberhard Neumann. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This is not the best page, for instance him being chair of DGIB has a broken link. This matters as that is an automatic pass of WP:NPROF#6. Not that he needs it as his citations and contributions are impressive, a clear pass of WP:NPROF#C1. I have left the comment by User:DoubleGrazing in, but it does not apply for academic notability. However, I suggest adding at least an authority control and Scopus profile.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 18:08, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wallace F. Marshall (February 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bravelake was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Bravelake (talk) 06:50, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Oded Rechavi

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mads Rivers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oded Rechavi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:09, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Oded Rechavi

[edit]

Hello, Mads Rivers. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Oded Rechavi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:27, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Schmidt Science Polymaths Program

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mads Rivers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Schmidt Science Polymaths Program, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mads_Rivers&oldid=1357780537"