Jump to content

User talk:Maaketinggu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dify (January 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
SafariScribeEdits! Talk! 07:01, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Maaketinggu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SafariScribeEdits! Talk! 07:01, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dify (March 20)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Pythoncoder, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You should not use LLMs to write articles from scratch.

LLM-generated pages with the below issues may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

  • hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
  • unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
  • copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Dify to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 14:53, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dify has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dify. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 23:29, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Greenman,
Thank you for your feedback on Draft:Dify. I've just fixed the duplicate sources issue by merging the same citations together.
Could you please take another look at the draft when you have a moment?
Thanks so much for your help.
Maaketinggu Maaketinggu (talk) 08:05, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]