Hello, I'm Netstars22. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. Netstars22(talk to me!)03:51, 26 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your message. I have disclosed the AI assistance by including the Template:Ai-assisted template at the top of the draft, which I understood to be the correct disclosure pathway for AI-assisted content. Every fact in the article is sourced to a named, publicly accessible institution — the State Library of Western Australia, the State Heritage Office inHerit Register, the National Trust of Western Australia, the City of Perth Local Heritage Survey 2022, and the Reserve Bank of Australia archive. All citations are real and verifiable. The two photographs are my own original work uploaded to Commons under CC BY-SA 4.0. I am happy to work with reviewers on any specific content concerns. LukeForte (talk) 04:24, 26 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the clarification. I accept that the March 2026 policy applies. I am withdrawing this submission and will resubmit a human-written article. LukeForte (talk) 05:01, 26 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, DoubleGrazing, left the following feedback:
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
This could be notable, but the current sources aren't enough to establish that. The first one, on which this is mostly based, is written by a member of the Baird family, and therefore not independent. The second looks like a primary source. Some are just images, and it's not clear whether #7 is a published source at all. There is also quite a lot of information that doesn't appear to be supported by any source.
Hello, LukeForte!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:27, 26 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Netstars22. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. Netstars22 (talk to me!) 03:51, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
