User talk:Kguardian

Welcome!

Hi Kguardian! I noticed your contributions to The Loyal Pin and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! ⠀⠀⠀⠀ .n 20:06, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Becky Entertainment

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Becky Entertainment, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 19:17, 26 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

June 2026

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:55, 27 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators: If this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue. Admins lifting or loosening such blocks without appropriate authorization may, at the discretion of the Arbitration Committee, be desysopped.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kguardian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

You blocked my user indefinitely under the premisse of editing in exchange for compensation, including money or other incentives. But that isn't truth I'm just a general fan of the artist that update its current career information for free as a member of wikipedia community, focus only on keep the page update and more complete as possible for all users that may access. And all information added are of public knowledge and well referenced. So please I kindly request you to lift the block, also if you are the main responsible of the the downgrade of the page, which return to a less, older updated version, including its imagery, please revert. Also if any mistake of code, reference or wording was made under my contributions was full unintentional and just a silly honest mistake. So please analyse this correctly and be fair towards this decision. I appreciate.

P.S. If the page creation has a problem the page I was trying to create has also not intention of promotion or reward of any kind, the idea was just to added information about a company who manage a public career and its behind the scenes work. But I understand any confusion and even disagreeing can partially accepted the deletion of the page. But again being blocked over accusations of compensation its false in all pretenses, since there is not intention other than the growth of the community and updated of information for the public. Kguardian (talk) 12:37, 27 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I find it very difficult to believe you are just some random fan editing about their favorite celebrity. Literally every article you have edited has to do with Becky Armstrong; the one you attempted to create was about her production company. The logo you uploaded was claimed to have been released under the proper license, but no evidence of this was given, and the website of the company says "all rights reserved"- meaning that the logo can't be uploaded to Commons. I must conclude that either you 1) work for her production company and have the authority to release the logo for use on Wikipedia or 2) you are so much of a fan that you improperly took and uploaded the logo, potentially putting Wikipedia in legal jeopardy. Passionate fans are often confused for paid editors, because they are so passionate that it is difficult for them to edit neutrally. If you don't work for Armstrong, you should because you were promoting her as well as any employee would. I see no pathway forward without a formal topic ban from Becky Armstrong or anything to do with her(like her work or companies). Maybe someone else will disagree, but that's how I see it. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:08, 27 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.