User talk:Kaspar-trout
Welcome!
[edit]Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 09:47, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
LLM use
[edit]Please clarify if you have used any AI tools such as ChatGPT in the process of your editing. Please note that doing so is generally not allowed. Fermiboson (talk) 18:45, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Fermiboson, thank you for your message. I am happy to clarify the process of my editing. All the content has been sourced, reviewed, verified, and adapted by me in accordance with Wikipedia’s sourcing and neutrality guidelines. I may have used an AI tool to help verify my grammar and syntax for certain sentences, as well as a neutrality checker. I take full responsibility for the edits. Kaspar-trout (talk) 20:01, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- It appears that your use as described is in violation of policy and therefore I would appreciate if you could cease your use of AI tools in editing and use your own words instead. Typos and grammar mistakes are easily fixable while AI induced errors are not. (Also, there is no "may have used", either you have used or you haven't.) Fermiboson (talk) 21:52, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on Antisemitism in Europe
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Antisemitism in Europe, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:42, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Będzin, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hakoah was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello Kaspar-trout! Your additions to Będzin have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
- Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
- Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
- Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
- Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:54, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
- Hello @DiannaaDiannaa. Thank you for checking out and help me improving this article. I wrote a new version and found more referenecs as well. You'll let me know. Thank you Kaspar-trout (talk) 19:23, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
- The new version looks okay. Thanks for taking the time to do that. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:19, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Benlee. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 10:08, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- Absolutely. Thank you Kaspar-trout (talk) 11:40, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

The article Green Blue Deal for the Middle East has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
ECR article made by non-ECR user
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.
EaglesFan37 (talk) 23:29, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
CS1 error on Gabor Maté
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Gabor Maté, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:45, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Kaspar-trout. Thank you for your work on List of Iranian artists killed during state crackdowns. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for your work on this article. Please add sources and footnotes for the list itself. Please also establish notability as per WP:NLIST. Thanks and have a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Mariamnei (talk) 11:49, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Mariamnei Thank you for your comment and your help. I'm collecting a long list of sources to be added today. Kaspar-trout (talk) 12:40, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
May 2026
[edit]
Your edit to Maurice R. Stein has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. MCE89 (talk) 12:59, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- @MCE89 Thank you for helping. I'll rephrase. Kaspar-trout (talk) 13:05, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
Your edit to Paul Poiret has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your third warning. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:13, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
Contentious topics alert for pages relating to the Balkans or Eastern Europe
[edit]
You have recently made edits related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is a standard message to inform you that the Balkans or Eastern Europe is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. TylerBurden (talk) 20:39, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
AINB notice
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:AI noticeboard regarding an AI cleanup investigation which may be related to you. The thread is User:Kaspar-trout. StartOkayStop (talk) 20:42, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Green Blue Deal for the Middle East (June 8)
[edit]
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Green Blue Deal for the Middle East to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
|
Hello, Kaspar-trout!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Avgeekamfot (talk) 13:49, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
|
Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that in one of your recent contributions you cited a link to a source that may not be reliable. Sources considered unreliable should generally not be used to support statements. Information from an unreliable source can be challenged by other editors and removed. Reliable sources are generally those with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. Self-published material, user-generated content, and certain other outlets such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites or publications with a poor reputation for fact-checking may not meet these standards. If you are unsure about which sources are appropriate, there is a list of sources that are considered generally reliable. Additionally, some WikiProjects have their own lists of sources that are considered reliable for that particular subtopic. If you are still unsure about a source's reliability, you can ask at the reliable sources noticeboard. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie talk 16:16, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you @Ohnoitsjamie I suggest that the entire section then should be deleted, as it's almost impossible tou source within WP standards. What do you think? Kaspar-trout (talk) 17:03, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- I was reluctant to do that at first because it seemed like there should be a source out there somewhere that wasn't a promoted product guide, but on second thought I decided that weighted training gloves are not really boxing gloves in the first place, and more of a general fitness device, so I removed it as off-topic. OhNoitsJamie talk 23:38, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- Agreed Kaspar-trout (talk) 05:42, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
- I was reluctant to do that at first because it seemed like there should be a source out there somewhere that wasn't a promoted product guide, but on second thought I decided that weighted training gloves are not really boxing gloves in the first place, and more of a general fitness device, so I removed it as off-topic. OhNoitsJamie talk 23:38, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Hi, your edit here caught my attention because of a reference with the title "Making sure you're not a bot". Now I've looked at it in more detail, I notice you there is a sentences you added that is uncomfortably close to the source material. I see also that you have been warned about copyright violation before on multiple occasions.
Original text:
Titled "Pictures of the Ghetto", the exhibition was shown as early as summer 1945 and displayed in makeshift venues in Displaced Persons (DP) camps in Landsberg and Feldafing, as well as in Munich.
Your text, my emphasis
As early as summer 1945, Kadish used his photographs in his traveling exhibition Pictures of the Ghetto displayed in makeshift venues in Displaced Persons (DP) camps in Landsberg and Feldafing, as well as in Munich
I advise you to stop doing this. It would be also nice if you could find other instances where you've done this and sort that out, because I really don't want to have to go to every edit you've made and see if they're copyvios or not.
Morwen (talk) 14:11, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @Morwen, yes you're right. There shouldn't be more. I remember that edit because I was trying to compress several details into one sentence and a part of it remained unchanged, but that is not an excuse. I’ll rewrite it now. Also, I see that the reference title also clearly captured the wrong page. Thank you for pointing this out to me. Kaspar-trout (talk) 14:44, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks! Morwen (talk) 15:09, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
There is at least one other one I have spotted, by the way. Morwen (talk) 15:15, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
- I'll go through them Kaspar-trout (talk) 15:21, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
From Our Latin Thing:
The New York Times review described them as “blocks where the city sanitation sweepers seem never to have visited”. Indeed, the mise-en-scène underscores the deteriorating economic conditions at the end of the 1960s and in the early 1970s, a period marked by the serial displacement of Puerto Rican residents, increasing unemployment, and disinvestment in Black and Puerto Rican neighbourhoods throughout the city. The opening scene also summons memories of the Young Lords garbage offensive in 1969 in East Harlem.
quote from article
Critics have read these street sequences in relation to the deteriorating economic conditions of the period, including displacement, unemployment, and disinvestment in Black and Puerto Rican neighborhoods, and has linked the opening street scene to memories of the Young Lords’ 1969 “Garbage Offensive” in East Harlem.
Morwen (talk) 11:08, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
- I could rewrite like this: Critics noted the film’s urban setting situates the film within the social and economic context of New York City in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when many neighbourhoods faced disinvestment, unemployment, poor municipal services, and eventually displacement. The opening scene has been interpreted as evoking the Young Lords’ 1969 garbage offensive in East Harlem, a protest against unequal sanitation conditions. Kaspar-trout (talk) 11:44, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
- Personally I think that's still too close a paraphrase. The aim here is not to take a quote and then slowly permute it word by word until it is sufficiently different. If I were you I would identify all the places I have done this and remove the copyvio. I wouldn't even worry about replacing it for now. Morwen (talk) 11:49, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Morwen thank you for your help (and friendly tone). i appreciate it. I'd like to replace this paragraph though. maybe the Young Lords' garbage offensive isn't necessary. I think it could be cut as it is interpretative anyways Kaspar-trout (talk) 12:37, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
- It must be removed now. You can replace it at your leisure afterwards. Morwen (talk) 12:39, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Morwen thank you for your help (and friendly tone). i appreciate it. I'd like to replace this paragraph though. maybe the Young Lords' garbage offensive isn't necessary. I think it could be cut as it is interpretative anyways Kaspar-trout (talk) 12:37, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
- Personally I think that's still too close a paraphrase. The aim here is not to take a quote and then slowly permute it word by word until it is sufficiently different. If I were you I would identify all the places I have done this and remove the copyvio. I wouldn't even worry about replacing it for now. Morwen (talk) 11:49, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
source:
Grossman had taken steps while still in the ghetto to ensure that his photographs would be preserved by frequently distributing them among his friends who hid them (Arieh Ben-Menachem thus retained 417 prints) and hiding them before his deportation in October 1944 (he had been part of the “cleanup commando” after the liquidation of the ghetto).
Grossman’s friend, the designer Pinchas Shaar, said the photographer stashed thousands of negatives, hundreds of prints, his Leica camera and jewelry entrusted to him by relatives, in two big clay jars and buried them in opposite walls of an abandoned bunker. Ben-Menahem gives a somewhat different account, writing that Grossman packed his archive in tin cans inside a wooden crate, “with the help of a friend he took out a window sill in his apartment, removed some bricks, placed the crate in the hollow, then replaced the sill.” The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C., says the prints were hidden in the apartment and in a cellar.
After the war, part of the archive was recovered by Shaar and Grossman’s sister Rozsa, and taken to Israel where many disappeared during the Arab-Israeli war of 1948.
your edit:
Before his deportation in October 1944, Grossman attempted to preserve his photographic archive by distributing prints among friends and hiding negatives and prints in the ghetto. One of them, Arieh Ben-Menachem later retained 417 of Grossman’s prints. Accounts differ on how the remaining archive was hidden: Pinchas Shaar recalled that Grossman placed negatives, prints and his Leica camera entrusted to him
by relativesin twobigclay jarsandburiedthem in opposite walls of an abandonedin an abandoned bunker, while Ben-Menachem wrote that the material was packed in tincans inside a wooden crate and concealed behind a window sill in Grossman’s apartment. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum describes the photographs as having been hidden in the apartment and in a cellar. After the war, part of the archive was recovered by Shaar and Grossman’s sister Rozsa, and taken to Israel where many disappeared during the Arab-Israeli war of 1948.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Morwen (talk • contribs) 16:27, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
wikis as sources
[edit]Hi again, I thought I'd check back to see how you're getting on with removing the sort of thing I highlighted earlier and I'm afraid I've seen some additional concerning edits - specifically that [2] [3] both add facts sourced to a wiki at boxrec.com. We usually can't use wikis as sources - see WP:USERGEN. Morwen (talk) 15:02, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hi again, sorry for the delay. If I understood properly, your concern is about the nature of the two BoxRec sources, right? I had the same doubt, but I noticed that BoxRec is cited on many boxing-related pages because sources are not always straightforward in this field, especially for figures who were not major headline names. My understanding was that BoxRec could at least support basic factual information such as fight records or professional activity. That said, I can either remove those references or keep them only where they support simple record-based facts, while trying to replace them with more appropriate secondary sources where possible. Kaspar-trout (talk) 13:45, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

