Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Agent VII, left the following feedback:
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Kindly refer to WP:CITE guidelines for using reliable references in an article/draft,
Hello, Janestz!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Agent007 (talk) 05:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, DoubleGrazing, left the following feedback:
Pointless resubmission without any attempt at improvement; previous decline still stands.
Your 'references' are not references, they are just a list of external links. You need to cite them against the information they provide, so that it is clearly which source has provided what information, and how much of this remains unreferenced. As it stands, this could be just you telling the world about your organisation, which is inherently promotional (see WP:YESPROMO).
