User talk:Igor123121

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Igor123121. Thank you for your work on Jan Kochanowski Street. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed week!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:04, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

both the Indiana and Ohio State football pages's rivalries section feature both teams which is alright the problem is that the sections are both too long compared the others rivalries in the section for instants the Ohio State section on Indiana's rivalry section of their page is twice as long as the purdue section or Kentucky section. Which therefore presents an anomaly, overall I believe both Ohio State, and Indiana's rivalry shuldn't be include on either page's as a rivalry page has not been created. Once a page is created with the correct sources that both section on both school's football pages on each other's team should be include, but not as long as the other's as it isn't a primary rivalry. But that's just my opinion. ~2026-38986-0 (talk) 17:27, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Igor123121. Thank you for your work on Tadeusz Pawlikowski Street. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this article on a Polish street. It's similar in notability to others in Category:Streets in Kraków. The article seems to be a direct translation of the Polish equivalent; note that this should be acknowledged in the first edit summary; see HELP:TRANSLATION.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 17:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Igor123121. Thank you for your work on Piastowska Street. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed and wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from pl:Ulica Jabłonowskich w Krakowie to Jabłonowskich Street. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. – DreamRimmer (talk) 06:47, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Igor123121. Thank you for your work on Legionów Józefa Piłsudskiego Street. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:33, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Igor123121. Thank you for your work on Stroma Street. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Don't put citations in section headers.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 20:14, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stroma Street moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Stroma Street. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:24, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Streets need significant coverage in reliable sources to be notable. A city map, book of street names, and list of buildings are not sufficient to establish notability. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:25, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Voorts Understood. In the future, I will focus on creating articles about significant streets and those in the city center. Igor123121 (talk) 20:29, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find additional coverage that significantly describes the street or its history, feel free to add it and restore the draft. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:31, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The World Destubathon

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize and $250 worth of prizes for architectural articles. If you are interested in winning something to help you buy books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for articles which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:28, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 16 Garncarska

The article 16 Garncarska has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unclear how this passes WP:GNG, WP:NBUILDING.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Govvy (talk) 15:26, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mogilska Street moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mogilska Street. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:54, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for warning several vandals for me. Faster than Thunder (talk \| contributions) _{Tamil speakers: Contribute here} 21:22, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Igor123121. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 15:54, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Miechowska Street moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Miechowska Street. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:20, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Władysław Reymont Street moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Władysław Reymont Street. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:37, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oskar Kolberg Street moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Oskar Kolberg Street. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:40, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hugo Kołłątaj Street moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hugo Kołłątaj Street. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:47, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Krowoderska Street moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Krowoderska Street. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:50, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Krótka Street moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Krótka Street. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:43, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fourth edition of D&D.

The fourth Edition of D&D is not the present edition. Thus, anyone can plainly see that anything referring to the 4th edition would be in the past tense. 96.11.107.227 (talk) 20:54, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Krzywa Street moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Krzywa Street. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:26, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nowa Street moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Nowa Street. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:42, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Christianity in Syria

Th source is Wikipedia itself, I did a sum of the inhabitants of each town. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.4.243.13 (talk) 16:27, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football/Clubs

learn this pattern, i have lot of experience in correcting articles, will do same with SC Poltava 93.140.85.35 (talk) 13:56, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are stepping over a line

WP:TALK, which addresses how to use Wikipedia talk pages. While it doesn't explicitly say "you don't need sources for opinions," the general guideline is that talk pages are for discussing improvements to articles, and opinions on how content should be phrased or structured can be made without sourcing.

The specific guidance comes from:

WP:TALK: Talk pages are meant for discussing improvements, and it's not necessary to provide sources just for expressing an opinion, as long as you're not presenting new information as fact.

WP:V (Verifiability) applies to content in the main article, but on a talk page, you're allowed to express opinions or ideas based on what you think the best approach would be for neutrality, clarity, or policy adherence.

For example, on a talk page, you can say:

"I believe the wording here is too sensationalized and violates NPOV. Instead of using 'violently beat,' perhaps we could say 'assaulted,' which is more neutral."

In this case, you’re expressing an opinion, but you're not making a claim of fact or proposing a new, unsourced statement for the article.

To clarify further:

WP:Consensus applies when you're trying to reach an agreement in the discussion, so it's encouraged to show your reasoning, but you don't need to bring sources for your opinions unless you're making factual claims. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.213.37.20 (talk) 14:28, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Premier League overseas broadcasters

hello, the 2022-25 cycle of epl worldwide rights was over, but someone reverted it, please edit them 117.5.247.113 (talk) 17:16, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User talk pages

Note that editors are allowed to blank their talk pages - see WP:BLANKING. If they do so, please don't revert them as you did here.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:50, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sources that you have requested about the 1st BCh Battalion.

Hello.

This is about the additions I have made to the Wikipedia page about the 1st BCh Battalion, with you requesting me to provide you with source(s) for the information I posted.

Here is an Internet source:

https://www.ivrozbiorpolski.pl/index.php?page=basaj

Aside from the above, also this book:

Zbigniew Ziembikiewicz, W Partyzantce u "Rysia", Ludowa Spoldzielnia Wydawnicza, Warszawa, 1978. 2001:569:7CEB:7B00:8CEE:3A8E:B214:2F87 (talk) 18:34, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HM Treasury Rollback

Hi there! I noticed you rolled back my edits to the HM Treasury History section. I'm just wondering why? LunaExplorer (talk) 20:06, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LunaExplorer Hi, sorry, it was an accident. I had already reverted everything before your message ;) Igor123121 (talk) 20:08, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw that, sorry about that! Sent you a thank you <3 LunaExplorer (talk) 20:13, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nadiad

Please stop making unconstruvtive edits to the article. Your content is unreferenced and badly written, and none of your edits have had an edit summary. Also, you have now breached the 3RR. 2003:D3:FF04:D94E:C05C:DFF2:6723:6CA5 (talk) 18:02, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your content was unreferenced and very badly-written. You did not use edit summaries. You ignored multiple polite requests. You breached 3RR more than once. You REALLY need to learn how Wikipedia works, and not least as your edit history shows you are very keen on warning others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:D3:FF04:D94E:C05C:DFF2:6723:6CA5 (talk) 18:26, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Igor123121 I am with the IP here. Why are you not using edit summaries in your reversions? And why are you ignoring the requirements of WP:BURDEN, which means the onus is on you to reference your additions? Danners430 _{tweaks made} 18:52, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Danners430 Hi. My mistake – I’ve admitted to it. As for WP:BURDEN – I completely disagree with you. This is just an example, but imagine someone deletes the entire content of an unsourced page, and when reverting it so the page isn’t empty, I’m supposed to add sources? As for the mistake I mentioned earlier, I admitted it and reverted my own edit myself: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nadiad&diff=prev&oldid=1311749366 Igor123121 (talk) 18:59, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here’s the problem - if an article is unsourced, WP:V allows for the content to be deleted. Anyone is allowed to remove unsourced content - and it shouldn’t be re-added unless sources have been found and added. And if an entire article is unsourced and sources can’t be found, then perhaps it’s time for an AfD… Danners430 _{tweaks made} 19:13, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mate igor leave me ALONE

Igor stop being ANNOYING thanks , G . x x 82.132.237.170 (talk) 19:05, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fisher Ames

To my knowledge, four Founding Fathers died on July 4th, not three. James Monroe, 5th president of the United States, also died on July 4th, 1831. Wikipedia states it on James Monroe’s page, but here is a source if you need a verification. https://millercenter.org/president/monroe 157.201.98.1 (talk) 21:48, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Kinkade

Hi! I saw you reverted an edit that I made on Thomas Kinkade as vandalism. The edit removed a lengthy quote in the lead, sourced from a single critic on a subject widely covered by critics. It's included verbatim in the body, and the current lead has the full credentials of the quote's source clogging everything up. I'm not going to push it since I'm editing from an IP. But it's worth taking a second glance at the content. 73.4.7.165 (talk) 16:08, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stack Overflow

Hi. I see you used rollback to reverted an edit that I made on Stack Overflow, and the rollback had no edit summary. My edit was to remove a vague, opinionated, one-sentence section that was sourced only by a blog, and the edit included an edit summary explaining that. Please remember that rollback is not supposed to be used to make unexplained reversions of good-faith edits.

Your revert of my edit

Hello Igor, my edit that you reverted was adding a ^{[failed verification]} tag, which means that I have checked the present source and have not found the claim in it. Adding such a tag does not require me to 'add a source'.--62.73.72.101 (talk) 21:33, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please take care reading context before reverting edits

It would take an extremely strained and inaccurate reading of the article and its sources to assert that china is a democracy according to liberal democrats.

Please remember that tools like twinkle and rollback are meant to be used with care - a large number of other users have noted that you use these tools before reading their edits in context. 65.38.90.168 (talk) 22:03, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent rollback edit

Hi Igor, You reverted my recent edit on a tiny village in Poland. Could you clarify whether you verified the source before doing so? My edit also corrected a spelling mistake, which was undone by your rollback. Additionally, no edit summary was left, which makes it hard to understand your reason for the reversion. Tools like Twinkle and quick rollback rights that you have beed recently granted are generally intended for clear-cut vandalism and obvious errors. Using them without checking sources or content can reintroduce mistakes and remove helpful improvements. Thanks 5.173.164.81 (talk) 08:26, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Improper uses of rollback

Hi Igor! Somebody complained to me about your use of rollback to revert good-faith edits without an edit summary, which is against the rollback policy. Looking through your recent use of rollback, I can confirm the following examples of improper use of rollback:

Special:Diff/1315183613: You removed a good-faith and positive edit without an edit summary using rollback. In this case, you probably should not have made this edit at all, but if you disagreed with the anonymous user's edit, you should use the undo button with an informative edit summary.
Special:Diff/1315098856: You used rollback to revert a good-faith edit (though you did include an edit summary here). This is not as big of an issue because you used the edit summary, but you should still reserve rollback for clear cases of vandalism only.
Special:Diff/1315098805: Here again, you removed a good-faith and positive edit without an edit summary using rollback. This is a tricky topic so it is especially careful to use edit summaries and to assume good faith.

In the future, please use rollback ONLY for cases of obvious vandalism. Otherwise, an administrator will have to remove the rollback right from your account. Thanks! Malinaccier (talk) 13:29, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stroma Street

Hello, Igor123121. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stroma Street, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stroma Street

Hello, Igor123121. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Stroma Street".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:28, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mogilska Street

Hello, Igor123121. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mogilska Street, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Miechowska Street

Hello, Igor123121. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Miechowska Street, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Władysław Reymont Street

Hello, Igor123121. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Władysław Reymont Street, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Oskar Kolberg Street

Hello, Igor123121. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oskar Kolberg Street, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hugo Kołłątaj Street

Hello, Igor123121. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hugo Kołłątaj Street, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Krowoderska Street

Hello, Igor123121. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Krowoderska Street, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Krótka Street

Hello, Igor123121. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Krótka Street, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:10, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mogilska Street

Hello, Igor123121. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mogilska Street".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 14:26, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Miechowska Street

Hello, Igor123121. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Miechowska Street".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:24, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 21 Mazowiecka Street apartment building for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 21 Mazowiecka Street apartment building is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/21 Mazowiecka Street apartment building until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 17:42, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Władysław Reymont Street

Hello, Igor123121. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Władysław Reymont Street".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:36, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Oskar Kolberg Street

Hello, Igor123121. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Oskar Kolberg Street".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:39, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Krzywa Street

Hello, Igor123121. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Krzywa Street, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nowa Street

Hello, Igor123121. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nowa Street, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hugo Kołłątaj Street

Hello, Igor123121. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Hugo Kołłątaj Street".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Krowoderska Street

Hello, Igor123121. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Krowoderska Street".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Krótka Street

Hello, Igor123121. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Krótka Street".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:26, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Mont Blanc Picture

Hi Igor123121,

I hope you're doing well. I’d like to suggest updating the current image of Mont Blanc. The existing view doesn’t fully capture the peak’s defining feature: its striking whiteness, which is the very reason for its name ("Mont Blanc" translates to "White Mountain").

I’ve found an alternative image that showcases the peak’s iconic whiteness far more vividly than the previous one, perfectly illustrating why it bears this name. This view also represents the most famous and recognizable perspective of Mont Blanc, aligning with how it’s widely perceived.

Would it be possible to replace the current image with this more representative view? I believe it would enhance the visual quality and relevance of the content for everyone.

Thank you for considering my request! Let me know if you’d like me to provide the image or any further details.

Best regards,

Hseugut Hseugut (talk) 20:25, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Hseugut I understand, go ahead and restore your edit - I won't revert it again :) Igor123121 (talk) 20:29, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Igor. I will try again then. Enjoy the day :) Hseugut (talk) 20:38, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Krzywa Street

Hello, Igor123121. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Krzywa Street".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:24, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nowa Street

Hello, Igor123121. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nowa Street".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:24, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Błażej Poźniak

The article Błażej Poźniak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPROF with an h-factor of 16 and their citations/year have dropped considerably. The criteria on the english WP for academics are much stricter than those in other languages.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:12, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]