User talk:IWannaBeSedated24

Welcome!

Hi IWannaBeSedated24! I noticed your contributions to Lactation and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Coryphantha Talk 22:09, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Proclamation of accession of Elizabeth II have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Proclamation of accession of Elizabeth II was changed by IWannaBeSedated24 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963784 on 2021-01-12T01:21:55+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:21, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources supporting the text & lead style

Hi @IWannaBeSedated24,

It's great having you contribute to the veganism page - with enough effort we can all make that a high quality article again. This needs to be done according to the Wikipedia guidelines, and I want to make sure you are aware. As it stands, your recent edit [1] isn't quite following these fully. I'll leave them for now so you have time to fix this, though someone else might of course.

That last edit was in the lead. While inline citations are not required the information still needs to be supported. This must be text further down the article which then in turn has to have the inline citations there. The lead should also be a summary, this is not the right place to list all detail. Instead it should be kept high level. E.g. read up on Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section, and also Wikipedia:Reliable sources

Specifically, e.g. "dophinariums" are not mentioned in the broader text, so probably don't belong in the lead as these are a detail. Then, "horse racing" has the same issue and it makes the list of examples too large. The use of examples here helps reader understand the wider topic, it should not be an exhaustive list.

The best fix for all this, imho, would be to add sourced topics in the main body of the article, the animal product and animal use sections are perfect for that. Then, select the best couple examples and keep those in the lead. I'll see if I have time to add as well. Sklabb (talk) 14:48, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok IWannaBeSedated24 (talk) 16:55, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have the same to say as Sklabb for your additions to furry fandom. Even if your definition of what makes something anthropomorphic is correct, the article has to match what ANTHRO, Litcharts, Merriam-Webster, or any other site/book/dictionary says the definition is. Maybe you can find a better one in FurScience - it's free, and I haven't read the whole thing. -- Recon rabbit 15:25, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lucifer (Disney character).webp listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lucifer (Disney character).webp, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- Recon rabbit 17:51, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lucifer (Disney character).webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lucifer (Disney character).webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 06:43, 19 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mukesh Prasad (May 11)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Devonian Wombat, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Mukesh Prasad to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:33, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IWannaBeSedated24! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:33, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]