User talk:HomelessPB&J

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iceflake Studios, a link pointing to the disambiguation page DLC was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 21:18, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on CarTech Motorsport

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page CarTech Motorsport, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:39, 12 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Thank you for your edits, do you have discord because there is a dinky little group dedicated to feeder series wiki, which has the majority of Wikipedia editors in the general motor racing scene BurningBlaze05 (talk) 10:31, 21 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I do, but to be honest, I'm not really active on there and haven't used it in a while. Although, I can still join if you'd like. Also, do they focus primarily on the feeder series wiki, or is it more broad? I'm asking since I don't focus on feeder series stuff but instead on sportscar racing. HomelessPB&J (talk) 12:56, 21 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yep it's rather broad!

(My discord is Memedanker52, I'll send the link there) BurningBlaze05 (talk) 05:23, 23 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alright cool! I'll send a request shortly. HomelessPB&J (talk) 18:36, 24 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gray Newell has been accepted

Gray Newell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 19:26, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Draftification

Hello HomelessPB&J,

Please review WP:DRAFTIFY for guidance on when it is appropriate to draftify an article. It can happen as the result of an AFD discussion but is primarily for newly-created articles. You draftified an article that was several years old which is inappropriate. Please seek other solutions if an article has problems like a) work on improving the article yourself, b) tag it noting any problems that exist or c) pursue one of the accepted forms of deletion.

If you have questions about draftifying articles, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. MSport1005 (talk) 10:44, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]