User talk:Hirematviru

October 2025

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1][2] MrOllie (talk) 11:22, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: T.A. Narayana Gowda (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shocksingularity was:

The text of this submission has been removed from Wikipedia. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning biographies of living persons; we cannot accept such articles if they are unsourced, or contain unverifiable information which is potentially defamatory. All articles about living persons must conform to our biographies of living persons policy. In order to permit the author of this submission to provide sources that may satisfy the policy, the text of the page is available in the history.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:T.A. Narayana Gowda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Shocksingularity (talk) 02:25, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hirematviru! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Shocksingularity (talk) 02:25, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I want to lear wikipedia as an editor. i have tried many times to understand how editing works on wikipedia and failed most times. i successfully did few edits so far. but want to grow more by contributing more on the platform. The wikipedia is an alltime learning experience for me which which always keeps me amaze on every edits i do. Can you please help me learn on how to contribute and work on it. Hirematviru (talk) 06:25, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Hirematviru.

I would recommend reading Wikipedia:Everything you need to know which outlines our policies in an easy to understand way.

I'd also recommend checking out Special:Homepage which gives you suggested edits to make based off your experience and interests!

Do you have any specific questions about policy or editing? Let us know and we can hopefully answer them. qcne (talk) 09:26, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your inputs, i have gone thru these links and are helpful. I need a support to understand a recent publish, a page submitted was drafted back as lack of reliable secondary source means. how can it be fixed? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rachika_Suresh Hirematviru (talk) 04:34, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again @Hirematviru. On that draft, what would you say are the three strongest sources that each meet the criteria set out at WP:GOLDENRULE? qcne (talk) 10:33, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne 1 to 7 i feel they are strongest sources. Hirematviru (talk) 12:37, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Which three? qcne (talk) 11:39, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne,

out of12, 1 to 7 sources are strong. To specify 3 strongest sources,

"Rachika Suresh wins Miss India Teen 2023 and receives movie offers from Kannada and Tamil film industry". TV9 Kannada. Retrieved 14 November 2025.
"Presenting the Top 20 Finalists of Miss Diva Beauty Queen 2025". Femina. Retrieved 2025-11-14.
"ಶ್ರವಣಬೆಳಗೊಳದಿಂದ ಅಂತಾರಾಷ್ಟ್ರೀಯ ರನ್‌ವೇಗಳವರೆಗೆ – ಮಾಡೆಲ್ ರಚಿತಾ ಸುರೇಶ್ ಅವರ ಪ್ರಯಾಣ - ಕರುನಾಡ ಸುದ್ದಿ - ಅತ್ಯುತ್ತಮ ಕನ್ನಡ ಸುದ್ದಿಗಳಿಗಾಗಿ". karunadasuddi.in. 2025-11-14. Retrieved 2026-01-03.

Hirematviru (talk) 12:19, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Hirematviru. Your first source is okay, but your second source provides no sigcov and your second source is an interview so is not independent. If those are the best sources, then the sources aren't strong enough for an article to be possible yet. qcne (talk) 18:56, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne, Thank you for inputs, now i understood. like the first source, i have two more sources,

"Actress Rachika Suresh:ನಟಿ ರಚಿಕಾ ಈಗ ಮಿಸ್‌ ಇಂಡಿಯಾ ಟೀನ್‌ | Udayavani - Latest Kannada News, Udayavani Newspaper"
"Actress Rachika Suresh crowned Miss India Teen 2023". NewsFirst Live. Retrieved 14 November 2025. and few are more the same. and sorry i was not reachable for few days, i was unable to communicate at that time.

Hirematviru (talk) 13:33, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

January 2026

Hello Hirematviru. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Hirematviru. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Hirematviru|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 08:16, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea I realized my mistake. i am a new bee to wikipedia editing . my friend kalyani and I together worked on the article on which we both are working. as to learn and grow on wikipedia we both started writing on this article. we searched for many topics to work, and since we found one of the topic to work, we started to work together. i am not a paid person and not have a hold of knowledge in wikipedia still learning. please dont consider me as paidi person. i was not hired. its we both working together on rachika suresh named page. Hirematviru (talk) 05:01, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Beginning by attempting to create a new article is not a very good way to learn Wikipedia editing. When you create a new draft you have to know a number of important policies and guidelines, and that is hard! Spend some months improving existing articles – there are hundreds of thousands of Wikipedia articles that need improving – and then you will learn as you go along. My advice is to forget about this draft for now.

If you do not have any connection to the person you were writing about, it appears odd that you uploaded photos of her that you declared you had taken yourself! The images have been deleted as copyright violations, so you do not need to worry about those, but for the future remember that you may not upload any copyrighted images unless you own the copyright yourself (and when you do upload your own images you give everybody in the world the right to use the image in any way they like). --bonadea contributions talk 13:42, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Another important thing: do not use ChatGPT or any other large language model to generate text or references for Wikipedia. Thanks, --bonadea contributions talk 13:44, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea thanks for suggestions. i have started looking for contents where i have a little knowledge of topic to contribute any new update or something is not right to be corrected. and yes, there are suggestion from wikipedia to improve pages but the topics i get to work are completely out of my interest which make me tired to work on it. Hirematviru (talk) 12:40, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ansil Jaleel

The article Ansil Jaleel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pure WP:BLPCRIME/WP:BLP1E article, about an otherwise not really notable person discussed for criminal allegations without conviction.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Fram (talk) 16:41, 11 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adarsh Iyengar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adarsh Iyengar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[3]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

EaglesFan37 (talk) 22:56, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]