Jump to content

User talk:Gwen Gale/archive22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Edelseider / RCS

Hello Gwen- Blast from the past here, from way back in the aughts! I noticed by chance that you had encountered someone a while back with whom I'm having some trouble at the moment. See User_talk:Diannaa#Bend_your_ear.3F for more info, and note that that post pre-dates the discovery that prompted my contacting you. I now see that this editor--a native German speaker who edits under the unified login "Edelseider" and, despite unfortunate language challenges, is these days most active here on en.wp--is someone you blocked in a past incarnation as User:RCS. First, do you know if it's ok for him to be editing here again? And second, if it came to it, would you be willing to mention on the ANI (see Diannaa talkpage link) something about his trouble-making past? The admins who have chimed in so far don't seem to have discovered Edelseider/RCS's contentious editing practices, and seem to be treating the issue like a spat between me and him, not perceiving, apparently, that I avoid directly engaging him. Thanks in advance for any attention you can give this; I understand that it's out of the blue and somewhat tedious... Eric talk 23:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

How do you know it's User:RCS? Gwen Gale (talk) 03:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, forgot that part! By Edelseider's own assertion on his de.wp talkpage, at the beginning of this section (in German). You'll find an editor interaction analysis here showing 104 articles in common; not sure how much this tells you. I tried to find a tool that counts the number of different articles an editor has edited so I could compare the two accounts in that way, but couldn't find one. See also: RCS' last 1,000 contributions, Edelseider's first 1,000. Thanks, Eric talk 12:03, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Gwen, here is some proof. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. Yes, I do think User:Edelseider and User:RCS are very likely one in the same. I blocked RCS seven years ago. Indefinte blocks tend to go stale after a year or two, even if the software lock isn't lifted. He seems to have come back as Edelseider 4 1/2 years later. That's a very long time here. Had I been aware of that at the time, I think I would've done no more than left a note on his talk saying something like, "Hey there, I know it's you, no big worries, please be good :)" He has edited for 3 1/2 years with no blocks. As the blocking admin, my outlook is, "sounds ok to me." Hence, I don't see this as socking or block evasion as such and will not block on this alone.
Eric, the edits of some non-native-English-speaking editors can stir up some woe now and then. Cleaning up syntax and grammar takes time. The language/cultural barrier can indeed stir up misunderstandings. Donc, on se calme. One chills out and deals with it, hopefully like a pro (which takes more time), a big slice of being a truly helpful volunteer. See also this take on editing Wikipedia
Eric, please heed Diannaa's words of wisdom elsewhere. I know you're here in very good faith. However, from what I can see, you went astray not only by making personal attacks, but you way canvassed them (WP:CANVASS). Please don't do that again :)
Even when bringing up what one sees as untoward editing by another, one must back it up with diffs to edits straightforwardly outside the bounds of policy and stay wholly neutral in wording.
Meanwhile, I think the best and easiest way to settle this down is for you to stay away from Edelseider and his edits for a month or two. Gwen Gale (talk) 19:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
@Eric: is really going to enormous lengths to try and get me evicted from Wikipedia, I really wonder why. He should come clear and clean and tell us all why he is so obsessed with me. Yes, I used to be RCS (talk · contribs); I also used to be Insert coins (talk · contribs). And I have done a lot of good things here! I write and edit articles and from time to time, I lose my temper. Without me, Wikipedia would be much poorer in content. But I have never stalked somebody and bullied somebody the way Eric does. He should stay away from me and my edits forever. --Edelseider (talk) 20:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Gwen- Thanks for your time and attention to this. While I don't see my posts as personal attacks--certainly nowhere near the level of tantrums and direct insults that this editor has routinely engaged in here and on de.wp--I appreciate your input. I did not know that the multiple comments under his nominations would constitute canvassing; had I realized that, I would have only posted a single one to alert editors to the self-promotion, despite his multiple affirmation-seeking nominations (which I infer do not constitute canvassing?).
I wish I did not know of the existence of Edelseider and editors like him. But occasionally I run across editing messes where I cannot help but suggest better editing habits. And if my initial polite suggestions are met with rudeness and self-righteousness, my generosity tends to wane. When Edelseider bolted straight to the ANI, and seemed to be immediately taken for an innocent, injured party by some commenters, I felt I had to prompt them to take a closer look at him, despite my reluctance to reward his attention-seeking behavior. I restrained myself (with some help) from posting there about his history on de.wp, which includes three reports on him from different editors as well as two blocks for personal attacks. It vexes me that I even spent the time on him to learn those things, but I got the impression no one else was going to.
It's no problem for me to stay away from Edelseider; I never wanted anything to do with him. Thanks again for your time and advice. Eric talk 21:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Both of you, please comment only on the edits, not the editor. Even saying good things about an editor may now and then seem like more than what's needed Oo. When commenting on what one sees as worrisome edits, one must always back it up with plenty of diffs and be way careful (stay neutral) with the wording. If good faith edits seem a bit sloppy or whatever, it's most often far easier and kinder to wait a bit, then go in and helpfully clean up the syntax, grammar and such.
I'd guess that, through the years, I've done this myself more than a thousand times, on copy written both by native and non-native English speakers. Still do. It takes time. It's work. If you don't want to deal with it, by far the best thing to do is, nothing at all.
Truly disruptive editors, such as those who let their lost, hot tempers show up on-wiki, sooner or later do get warned and if need be, shooed away from the kerfluffle or even blocked. Gwen Gale (talk) 22:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, Gwen, I must have been unclear in my above statements. I know all about diffs, thanks. I wasn't trying to document anything here, nor prompt you to undertake any action beyond advising me, unless you felt compelled to add some context to the ANI complaint. At first I merely wanted to determine if the RCS connection and history were relevant to the ANI. Later, I was just trying to explain myself to you to clarify the original motivation behind my offending posts, and to assure you that this issue did not arise out of a quarrel. I'm quite done with the whole thing, thanks. I do appreciate your work here, and I'm sorry to have taken up your time with this unfortunate business. Eric talk 23:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

I wasn't talking about here. Meanwhile, Beeblebrox is waiting for your answer over at ANI. Gwen Gale (talk) 23:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Not sure what to say there. I feel like I should never have dignified it with a response at all. Eric talk 23:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
I've been trying to help you. If you don't answer "yes" to an interaction ban between you and Edelseider (who has already agreed, voluntarily), Beeblebrox may likely make your side of it an involuntary sanction. I wholly agree with Beeblebrox.
By utter happenstance, both of you may want to read, at the top of User:Beeblebrox's user page, the quote from my dear old WP-friend User:Antandrus. It's so way fitting here. Gwen Gale (talk) 00:17, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

  • News and notes: Global Elections
    WMF Board election results, and FDC elections begin
  • Technology report: Tech news catch-up
    Bots, scripts, tools, and changes from February to June 2017

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

  • Op-ed: Facto Post: a fresh take
    Exploring sourcing issues in Wikimedia projects, a solution in Wikidata and fact mining, and a newsletter to continue the conversation.

Kobi Arad

Hi Gwen, three questions:

1. My name is Michael, Arad's manager, and therefore do not edit his articles. Is it ok if I ask an editor-frnd to edit the draft (I already before asked my frnd Peter Pattern)?

2. Does the following notability specifics seem fair as to be incorporated within the draft:

Subject meets notability in following sections:

WP:GNG

Non trivial and objective coverage by reliable sources such as: ynet.com, Jewish Week, All About Jazz (article) and Israel Times.

WP:MUSICBIO (Although single section notability is sufficient, Arad meets notability in 4 different sections)

Section1: Multiple Reliable Publications:

http://m.ynet.co.il/Articles/4182867https://www.allaboutjazz.com/sketches-of-imaginary-landscapes-kobi-arad-self-produced-review-by-glenn-astarita.php?width=412http://jewishweek.timesofisrael.com/for-jewish-artists-a-space-of-ones-own/

Section 6: Several of Kobi Arad's projects, featured several notable musicians:

● 'Sufi Songs' Trio featuring Bob Moses (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Moses_(musician) and Cecil Mcbee (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecil_McBee)

Sources:

- http://www.tunedloud.com/2017/07/05/kobi-arad-ellington-upside-down-as-a-musical-portrait-of-the-jazz-titan/

- https://www.ultimate-guitar.com/news/community_feed/jazz_pianist_kobi_arad_a_career_overview.html

● Grammy Awards- Claes Nobel Team Participating Notable musicians: Wouter Kellerman, Brent Fischer, Robert Margouleff, Mickey Stevenson, Ganda Boys

Sources: - http://fmwebtv.com/TheForgottenPeople/ - https://article.wn.com/view/2017/01/24/Kobi_Arad_Performs_with_Members_of_Israeli_Orchestra_in_Tel_/ - https://www.ultimate-guitar.com/news/community_feed/jazz_pianist_kobi_arad_a_career_overview.html

Section 7:

● Arad is a world-wide authority in the Third Stream style, as he is the first and only (as of 2012) musician to earn doctorate in the field.

Sources: - Letter from Dean of New England Conservatory of Music to Kobi Arad (dating 2012): https://issuu.com/kobiarad/docs/novak_letter - https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_stream - http://m.ynet.co.il/Articles/4182867

Section 9:

Arad participted in multitude of interviews which featured panel discussions, airplay and interviews in Israeli National Radio, IBA (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Broadcasting_Authority).

Sources:

- http://www.tunedloud.com/2017/07/05/kobi-arad-ellington-upside-down-as-a-musical-portrait-of-the-jazz-titan/ - https://issuu.com/zmiralu/docs/selection (Letter from Iba editor Zmira Luzki) - https://issuu.com/acum9/docs/5_7_1_ (BMI international airplay statements) - https://issuu.com/acum9/docs/9 (BMI international airplay statements)

3. In case the requirements are fulfilled (links are alive, and you find #2 satisfactory, are you going to be willing to assist in living the draft and unsalt 'Kobi Arad' article?

Thanks :=) Ee212 (talk) 23:41, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Having looked into it, I think this topic does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (music). Please be aware, this has nothing to do with any outlook I may have as to Mr Arad's talent, skills, work or background.
Given the sources cited, I would see no need to carry on editing a draft at WP:AFC until such time as citations showing this topic meets a notability standard might later show up. Gwen Gale (talk) 05:52, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

  • Gallery: A mix of patterns
    An interesting mix of patterns and colors to brighten your day...
  • Humour: The Infobox Game
    Enjoy the Parameters: The Infobox Game can be enjoyed by everyone, not just those interested in water buffalo breeds, volcanic hotspots or the mysterious heteroisoform, and some day just might spawn an important facet of the financial derivatives industry.
  • Wikicup: 2017 WikiCup round 3 wrap-up
    The heat turns up on the 32 contestants who entered round three: 13 featured articles, 82 good articles, 167 DYKs, but we had to pick just eight of them to advance.

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

  • WikiProject report: Comic relief
    An interview with a project that is centered around comics.
  • Featured content: Everywhere in the lead
    Recently promoted articles, lists and pictures – with a very heavy one in the mix
  • Technology report: Introducing TechCom
    The Architecture Committee adopts a new charter and name; and the latest in script, bot, and tech news
  • Humour: WWASOHs and ETCSSs
    An elite squad of highly insightful editors can lead the way for other editors who may need to retrain their faces into forming a smile.

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

  • WikiProject report: WikiProject YouTube
    WikiProject YouTube is a new project on both English and Simple English Wikipedia.
  • Technology report: Latest tech news
    Syntax highlighting, failed login notifications, watchlist filters, and more.
  • Humour: Bots
    They do the things you don't want to do (and sometimes things you don't want done).

Invitation to Admin confidence survey

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

  • News and notes: Chapter updates; ACTRIAL
    News from Wikimedia France, Wikimedia Macedonia, and Wikimedia Israel's; Autoconfirmed article creation trial begins
  • Humour: Chickenz
    The best that poultry has to offer
  • Gallery: Chicken mania
    Complimenting this issue's Humour about chickens...
  • Featured content: Flying high
    Newly featured birds, planes, and high achievers

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

  • News and notes: Cons, cons, cons
    The first ever Wikidata conference was a con we wanted. Problematic paid editing while in a position of trust: not so much.
  • Traffic report: Strange and inappropriate
    Readers intrigued by the Netflix show Stranger Things, and by sexual assault allegations.
  • Featured content: We will remember them
    War memorials, soldiers, extinct species, and devastating hurricanes are some of the most recently promoted featured content.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gwen Gale. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

  • Arbitration report: Last case of 2017: Mister Wiki editors
    Evidence phase in Mister Wiki editors case is complete; the community is proposing remedies and the Arbitration committee is slated to make a decision by end of year. Meanwhile, voting has closed on 2017 elections.
  • Gallery: Wiki loving
    Winners of the international photo competitions Wiki Loves Earth and Wiki Loves Monuments.

Seasons' Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:53, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

  • News and notes: Communication is key
    Two new WMF Communications department leadership appointments; a new way for Wikimedia communities to communicate their capacities.
  • Arbitration report: Mister Wiki is first arbitration committee decision of 2018
    In deciding to de-sysop an admin for efforts to evade discussion and review of paid edits made on behalf of a PR firm, Arbitration Committee doesn't significantly change the rules around paid editing, and leaves it up to the community whether to apply special restrictions to administrators.

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

  • From the editors: The Signpost's presses roll again
    Following Kudpung's op-ed "Death knell sounding for The Signpost?" in the 29 March issue, user comments encouraged a burst of enthusiasm to keep the newspaper in print.
  • Signpost: Future directions for The Signpost
    How to revive and evolve The Signpost? Big blue-sky proposals and small concrete proposals from the community and from two regular Signpost contributors.
  • In focus: Admin reports board under criticism
    A recent Community Health Initiative survey found only 27% of respondents are happy with the way reports of conflicts between Editors are handled on the Administrators' Incident Noticeboard (ANI).
  • Special report: ACTRIAL results adopted by landslide
    New major editing policy starting immediately: creation of articles in mainspace is to be limited to users with confirmed accounts
  • Op-ed: World War II Myth-making and Wikipedia
    Wikipedia's myth of the clean Wehrmacht and what you can do about it. Or, how not to be one of "the worst distributors of pro-Nazi perspectives and the Wehrmacht myth".
  • Discussion report: The future of portals
    What should we do about Portals? Keep them, delete them, or mark them as historical? Or should they be more closely connected with their WikiProject(s)?

Irene Craigmile Bolam article: please check what happens there

Hello Gwen, hope you are doing well!

I would like to attract your attention to the article "Irene Craigmile Bolam": both of us contributed several times into editing it.

During the last period some person using the name "Gibsononian" repeatedly replaces the text of the article with conspiracy fantasies of the conspiracy theorist Tod Swindell, that were debunked and discredited long ago. I think this is a deliberate campaign of misinformation of the readers and serious abuse of Wikipedia, that demand some proper reaction.

Kind regards - Alex V Mandel (talk) 15:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi Alex. Looks like they've stopped for now. My outlook/understanding on the topic aside (highly, highly likely Irene was not Amelia) their edits were wholly usourced so I'd say any editor can freely undo them on sight, short of blatant 3RR. Next step would be to give them a stern warning. Keep me posted if need be. Cheers. Gwen Gale (talk) 07:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

  • WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
    After a recent Village Pump discussion, the Signpost looks at WikiProject Portals.
  • News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
    De-recognition of Brazil user groups; brute-force attack on Wikipedia; Wikimedia Conference 2018; and assorted other silly things.
  • Gallery: Wine not?
    May 25 is National Wine Day in the United States.

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

  • News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania
    Major grants announced, a new milestone for Afrikaans Wikipedia, a new WMF technical engagement team, an effort to start up a new library, two new admins – or maybe three fewer depending on your math.
  • Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page
    Community discussions include style updates to project-wide icons and the main page, procedural questions on royal names and jettisoning unsuitable drafts, and deeper questions of compliance with European privacy laws and the perennial issue of shrinking admin corps.
  • Traffic report: Endgame
    Two celebrities hang themselves, and the FIFA World Cup is underway

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

  • From the editor: If only if
    Ships and shoes – and if you don't like it here, just go away!

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

  • Special report: Wikimania 2018
    "Bridging knowledge gaps, the ubuntu way forward".

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

  • In the media: Knowledge under fire
    Can Wikipedians help save the world's knowledge and shine a light on current events?

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

  • Technology report: Bots galore!
    Bots can do anything you want – well, almost.
  • Special report: NPP needs you
    WMF continues to stonewall development; NPP wishes again relegated to stocking fillers.
  • In focus: Alexa
    We are all writing for Amazon.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gwen Gale. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

  • Gallery: Intersections
    Biology or technology? Form follows function in nature and the constructed world.

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

  • News and notes: Some wishes do come true
    NPP wins the wish list poll; Wikipedia editors will be able to work better at night; new WMF appointments and new arbitrators; and who wants to be an admin?
  • In the media: Political hijinks
    Wikipedia says 'ta' to British M.P. and 'buh-bye' to U.S. President's image vandals.
  • Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
    Plus: reliable sources, notability, and fallout from the self-blocking software changes.
  • WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
    Discovering how new and unregistered users make articles with the members of WikiProject Articles for Creation.
  • Blog: News from the WMF
    In and around the WMF and its projects from the WMF's web site.
  • Essay: Requests for medication
    When the desire to continue to have the privilege of editing Wikipedia overrides the body's innate desire to choke the living shit out of some bastard who really has it coming.

Xmas

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:31, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

  • Technology report: When broken is easily fixed
    Emergency server switch goes smoothly; technical glitches resolved; a new way to transfer files to Commons.
  • News from the WMF: News from WMF
    The world’s largest photo contest, a $1 million gift, Wikipedia’s birthday, WF appoints Valerie D'Costa.
  • Essay: How
    A narrative to get you oriented to how this place works, and to the key policies and guidelines.

Possible Sockepuppeteer

Hi Gwen, I'm concerned that MyMainAccount is a socket puppeteer being a user that brought up here [1] I the issue does exist but I believe largely because the deadlink wasn't archived there are other sources that say the same thing as the specific source that is being targeted. I'm very suspicious of the user that added the tag to the article b/c that was literally the first thing the user has done on wiki. I thought this was unusual for a first time user.Mcelite (talk) 17:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

  • From the editors: Help wanted (still)
    This may be too wordy, verbose and loquacious – and possibly redundant – but as you know, it takes others to check our work, and if there were more people in the Newsroom, we'd be able to double check ourselves and produce a better product for our readership; if you think you are up to it, you are welcome to join us and even copyedit the Editor-in-Chief's article intros.
  • Discussion report: Talking about talk pages
    This month's major discussions include a WMF talk page consultation and a proposed current events noticeboard.
  • Featured content: Conquest, War, Famine, Death, and more!
    Horsemen of the apocalypse all represented in recently promoted content, alongside new life, pretty birds, great music, and other miscellaneous topics.
  • Traffic report: Binge-watching
    Netflix shows and TV sports dominate. A US politician breaks into the top 10.
  • Technology report: Tool labs casters-up
    Tool labs goes kaput, bots running wild (not really), interface administrators step into the breach, new gadgets and other tech happenings.
  • Gallery: Signed with pride
    A gallery of user signatures created by Wikipedians themselves.

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

Article Moved without discussion

Hi Gwen, Clouded leopard was moved to Mainland clouded leopard with no discussion among editors. I wasn't sure if this could be a simple redirect or not it was done by one user randomly with no discussion. Thank you for your time and help.Mcelite (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Happily, someone moved it back before I saw this. As an aside, would that there were housecats with coats like that. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:32, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

  • News and notes: An Action Packed April
    New Administrators, April Fools, our competitors, and other associated updates

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle
Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:36, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

  • From the editors: Picture that
    The North Face sneaks in advertisements, apologizes after being caught
  • Arbitration report: ArbCom forges ahead
    Resignations, new cases, administrator security, and more
  • Technology report: Lots of Bots
    Admin bots, approved bots, bots on trial, lots and lots of bots
  • Essay: Paid editing
    We've been talking about paid editing forever

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

  • Technology report: Actors and Bots
    Database changes, new scripts, Tech News, and more.
  • Gallery: Unlike the North Face, Wiki Loves Earth
    Wikimedia photographers surge to contribute to the Wiki Loves Earth campaign even while rogue clothing company The North Face replaces wiki illustrations with advertisements.

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

  • Special report: Post-Framgate wrapup
    Summary of actions around a formerly banned former administrator: Arbitration Committee action and withdrawn request for adminship

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

  • Arbitration report: October actions
    An "unblockable" is blocked; a former arb resigns.

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

  • Essay: Adminitis
    Some humor about the otherwise serious subject of burnout.

Season's Greetings

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:14, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

  • Discussion report: December discussions around the wiki
    Regarding integrity of information presented by Wikipedia, as well as the processes and people who ensure it remains trustworthy.

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

  • Arbitration report: Unfinished business
    A new case, a case returns from limbo, and an RfC being prepared.

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

Notice of noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Users with indefinitely protected user talk pages". Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

  • Featured content: Life finds a Way
    Animals, sports, military, and science feature heavily in this month's best content.

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

  • Featured content: Life finds a Way
    Animals, sports, military, and science feature heavily in this month's best content.

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

  • Op-Ed: Re-righting Wikipedia
    Wikipedia deprecates more right-wing sources than left-wing sources ... but is it a problem?

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

  • Traffic report: 2020 wraps up
    Punks and heroes, losers and winners, the bereaved and the deceased – they're all here.

"Anaheim Boulevard" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Anaheim Boulevard. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 5#Anaheim Boulevard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -322UbnBr2 (Talk | Contributions | Actions) 21:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

  • Obituary: Yoninah
    Barukh dayan ha-emet ("Blessed is the true judge.")

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Information icon Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Information icon Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:05, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Information icon Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux Talk 00:10, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

  • Obituary: SarahSV
    Requiescat in pace.

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

  • WikiProject report: Redirection
    An interview with participants at WikiProject Redirect.

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

  • WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2021
    15th annual event closes with hundreds of articles improved
  • From a Wikipedia reader: What's Matt Amodio?
    Wikipedia democratizes knowledge, but is it in Jeopardy?
  • Arbitration report: ArbCom in 2021
    We should have at least one of these every year!

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

  • From the editor: Here is the news
    And wishing our readers a healthy, fortunate and bountiful 2022.
  • Arbitration report: A new crew for '22
    Elections certified, bans unlifted, mailing lists restricted, but no new cases.
  • Humour: Buying Wikipedia
    Helpful how-to for the prospective buyer. Why settle for a measly single edit, when you can buy the whole thing?

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

  • WikiProject report: The Forgotten Featured
    Interview with volunteers at the Unreviewed featured articles 2020 working group.

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

  • WikiProject report: 10 years of tea
    Coffee in Teahouse and other secrets revealed in this interview with volunteers.

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

  • Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
    Reporting from on the ground in Ukraine.
  • From the archives: Burn, baby burn
    A look at when early backups of Wikipedia were recovered.

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

  • News and notes: Double trouble
    The second case of Wikipedian persecution.
  • Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary (Part 2)
    "Our proud Sparta bleeds too."
  • Interview: On a war and a map
    How a war map predated Wikimedia's map of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

  • Featured content: Featured content of April
    Showcasing the very best articles, pictures, videos, and other contributions from Wikipedians last month.
  • From the archives: The Onion and Wikipedia
    A look at when The Onion published an humorous article regarding Wikipedia.

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

  • Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary (part 3)
    "This year's victory was sad and dull."
  • Opinion: Criminals among us
    Mass murderers, sex criminals, Ponzi schemers, insider traders, and business people.
  • Gallery: A backstage pass
    All the things about theatre that the general public misses out on.

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

  • Discussion report: Boarding the Trustees
    2022 elections, new page patrol, Fox News, Vector 2022, Royal Central and external links
  • From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago
    The Signpost looks back on The Signpost: New reports, conceived in a spirit of collaboration, and dedicated to the proposition of information and, uh, more information for all.

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

  • Featured content: Farm-fresh content
    This month: A FACBot upgrade, a completed list of lists.

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

  • Disinformation report: Missed and Dissed
    Are government goons prowling our fair encyclopedia?
  • Book review: Writing the Revolution
    Heather Ford's new volume on Wikipedia, knowledge and power in the 2011 Egyptian revolution.
  • Technology report: Galactic dreams, encyclopedic reality
    Facebook's Galactica demo provides a case study in large language models for text generation at scale: this one was silly, but we cannot ignore them forever.
  • Obituary: A tribute to Michael Gäbler
    They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old: Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
  • CommonsComix: Joker's trick
    A toast to good health, a health to good hoax, a hoax to good toast.

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

  • Featured content: Would you like to swing on a star?
    You head into the featured content report. Amongst the features you see astronauts, both Gilbert and Sullivan, Ursula K. Le Guin's incredibly talented mother, and Billboard charts. It is pitch black, you are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  • From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
    Photographers, Sandy Hook, the shocking use of Nazi symbols in articles about Nazis, and "You wouldn't recognise a fact if it bit you in the ass".

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

  • Featured content: Flip your lid
    ...and your ambigram. Also: Boring lava fields, birds of Tuvalu, and commelinid family names with etymologies.

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

  • Featured content: Eden, lost.
    But much else to be found.

The Signpost: 9 March 2023

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

The Signpost: 03 April 2023

The Signpost: 26 April 2023

  • Special report: Signpost statistics between years 2005 and 2022
    In this article, we will look at The Signpost statistics. More precisely: Signpost article statistics by year, TOP 20 titles of Signpost articles, TOP 20 article authors, and the home wikis of article authors.
  • News from the WMF: Collective planning with the Wikimedia Foundation
    First of a two part series summarising the priorities for the Wikimedia Foundation's next fiscal year (July 2022–June 2023) including staffing, budget and other changes, and how to provide your feedback.
  • Humour: The law of hats
    The Selfish Hatnote, the Disambiguation Singularity, and other information-theoretic conundra of encyclopedic note.

The Signpost: 8 May 2023

The Signpost: 22 May 2023

  • Traffic report: Coronation, chatbot, celebs
    Celebs and Bollywood film dominated reader interest, as usual, but with a new persistent presence on the lists of a certain AI.

The Signpost: 5 June 2023

  • Featured content: Poetry under pressure
    Now is not this ridiculous, and is not this preposterous? A thorough-paced absurdity - explain it if you can.

The Signpost: 19 June 2023

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

  • Featured content: Incensed
    In which featured pictures have a pleasing orange/blue colour scheme for some reason.

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

  • Cobwebs: Getting serious about writing
    The innards of the Signpost received a major overhaul in March/April 2019. Here's how we reduced behind-the-scenes busywork and improved writers resources.

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

  • In the media: Taking it sleazy
    "Poli", which means "many", and "tics", which means "under-the-table Wikipedia article whitewashing campaigns".

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

  • Featured content: Catching up
    Covering all of August. Pretty much.

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

  • Featured content: By your logic,
    The first issue to feature two poetry article

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

  • Traffic report: Cricket jumpscare
    Plus Kollywood, Killers of the Flower Moon, and ongoing war.

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

  • Comix: Bold comics for a new age
    "I think we ought to read only the kind of comics that wound or stab us. If the comic we're reading doesn't wake us up with a blow to the head, what are we reading for?" — Franz Kafka
  • Humour: Mandy Rice-Davies Applies
    This page in a nutshell: Whether or not someone has denied unsavory allegations — though such a denial may not merit being given equal weight in an article — a worthless shitpost should still be included.

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

  • In the media: Consider the humble fork
    Forky on forky on forky, plus a strange donation scheme and other interesting bits of news.
  • Technology report: Dark mode is coming
    No more must Wikipedia always be a lightbulb in the dark — except metaphorically of course.
  • Crossword: when the crossword is sus
    The Signpost Crossword is a 2018 online multiplayer social deduction game that takes place in space-themed settings where players are colorful, armless cartoon astronauts.
  • BJAODN: Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
    Edit summary: "Only need this page for about 30 minutes to demonstrate to a friend how easy it is to create a Wikipedia page. Then it will be deleted."

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

  • News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!
    Let the games begin! The 2024 WikiCup is off to a strong start. With copyright enforcement, AI training and freedom of expression, it's another typical week in the wiki-sphere!
  • WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine
    What are the editorial processes behind covering some of the most politically polarizing and contentious topics on English Wikipedia?

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

  • Opinion: Until it happens to you
    A stream of consciousness about plagiarism on Wikipedia from the perspective of a user who directly witnessed it.
  • Comix: We've all got to start somewhere
    Writing a good subheading for a one-sentence joke is basically like writing an entire second joke so I'm not going to do it.

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

  • Comix: Strongly
    That's more than weakly!

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

  • In the media: War and information in war and politics
    Advocacy organizations, a journalist, mycophobes, conservatives, leftists, photographers, and a disinformation task force imagine themselves in Wikipedia.

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

  • Obituary: JamesR
    Rest in peace.

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

  • In focus: Twitter marks the spot
    Musk's Twitter acquisition and rebranding have caused long debates on Wikipedia.

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

  • Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
    User Hawkeye7 opens up on his experience as a media representative following the Australian team at the latest Summer Paralympics in Paris.
  • News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
    More changes to RfA on the way in October, final results for the U4C elections revealed, and other news from the Wikimedia world.

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

  • In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
    Perplexing persistence, pay to play, potential president's possible plagiarism, crossword crossover to culture, and a wish come true!
  • Book review: The Editors
    A novel about us, from the point of view of three of us.

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

The Signpost: 12 December 2024

  • Op-ed: On the backrooms
    An editor's reflection on social capital and their changing relationship with Wikipedia culture. by Tamzin

The Signpost: 24 December 2024

The Signpost: 15 January 2025

The Signpost: 7 February 2025

  • News and notes: Let's talk!
    The WMF executive team delivers a new update; plus, the latest EU policy report, good-bye to the German Wikipedia's Café, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
  • Community view: 24th Wikipedia Day in New York City
    Wikimedians and newbies celebrate 24 years of Wikipedia in the Brooklyn Central Library. Special guests Stephen Harrison and Clay Shirky joined in conversation.
  • Traffic report: A wild drive
    The start of the year was filled with a few unfortunate losses, tragic disasters, emerging tech forces and A LOT of politics.

The Signpost: 27 February 2025

  • Technology report: Hear that? The wikis go silent twice a year
    From patrolling new edits to uploading photos or joining a campaign, you can count on the Wikimedia platform to be up and running — in your language, anywhere in the world. That is, except for a couple of minutes during the equinoctes.
  • Opinion: Sennecaster's RfA debriefing
    User Sennecaster shares her thoughts on her recent RfA and the aspects that might have played a role in making it successful.

The Signpost: 22 March 2025

  • From the editor: Hanami
    It's an ecstasy, my spring.
  • Obituary: Rest in peace
    Send not to know
    For whom the bell tolls,
    It tolls for thee.

The Signpost: 9 April 2025

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

  • Traffic report: Of Wolf and Man
    Television dramas, televised sports, film, the Pope, and ... bioengineering at the top of the list?

The Signpost: 14 May 2025

The Signpost: 24 June 2025

The Signpost: 18 July 2025

  • Traffic report: God only knows
    Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?

The Signpost: 9 August 2025

File:Shamrock houston.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shamrock houston.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:17, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 September 2025

The Signpost: 2 October 2025

The Signpost: 20 October 2025

  • Traffic report: One click after another
    Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit "Kantara" crowd the tubes.

The Signpost: 10 November 2025

The Signpost: 1 December 2025

  • Comix: Madness
    It could happen to anyone.