User talk:Getdincts

This is Getdincts's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phut (juice) (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Old-AgedKid was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Phut (juice) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Old-AgedKid (talk) 13:12, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Getdincts! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Old-AgedKid (talk) 13:12, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Phut restaurant in Radziejów, Poland.png

Thanks for uploading File:Phut restaurant in Radziejów, Poland.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:31, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I took the photo myself while I was in Radziejów. However, I reuploaded the image to Wikimedia Commons, so this isn't a problem. Getdincts (talk) 15:36, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cil (Cyrillic) (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cil (Cyrillic) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 14:20, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phut (juice) (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoldRomean was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Many of the sources are WP:FACEBOOK, WP:YOUTUBE, and/or WP:TIKTOK.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Phut (juice) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoldRomean (talk) 20:27, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links to draft articles in actual articles, as you did to Molasses. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:08, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phut (juice) (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AllWeKnowOfHeaven was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Phut (juice) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 16:27, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Phut (juice) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Phut (juice). Thanks! AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 16:29, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Draft:TeX font encodings, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed.

For other edits, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:37, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove that? You said it's because it's copyrighted but I don't know at what point something starts getting copyrighted. Is the paraphrased version I added as a replacement okay? or is it still copyrighted? Getdincts (talk) 20:33, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The source document is marked as "© Copyright 1995–2016". That's how you can tell it's copyrighted. There's still some overlapping content in your draft, which you can view using Earwig's tool. Overlapping prose is highlighted. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 03:24, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The URL https://docplayer.net/8880030-L-a-tex-font-encodings.html timed out before any data could be retrieved. Getdincts (talk) 17:31, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I tried it just now, and it loaded very quickly. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:21, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Violation unlikely

16.7% similarity :) Getdincts (talk) 20:01, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Don't just look at the percentage. If you scroll down, you will see the paragraph "OT3 (aka UW IPA encoding) is a 7-bit TeX font encoding used for IPA. It was never really used with LaTeX 2ε following the introduction of the TIPA system which offers much better support for IPA. No ot3enc.def file was ever produced. This encoding is supported by the wsuipa package" has a lot of overlap. This needs to be fixed please. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:23, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it. Getdincts (talk) 20:27, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Phut (disambiguation)

The page Phut (disambiguation) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguated only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ended in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguated zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
was a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that did not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

June 2026

Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fish and chips, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The apparently self-published web essay you were citing is not considered a reliable source by Wikipedia. Belbury (talk) 14:27, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I second Belbury's comment, and would like to add that when there is a dispute like this on Wikipedia, you should not just re-add what was just deleted. That is WP:Edit warring. --Macrakis (talk) 18:22, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Getdincts (talk) 18:30, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phut (juice) (June 7)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Fortek67, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

The article is still mostly supported by citations to Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok. These sources are not allowed on Wikipedia per WP:RSPFACEBOOK, WP:RSPYT, and WP:RSPTIKTOK. See also Help:Referencing for beginners as most references are bare URLs.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Phut (juice) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Fortek67 (talk) 11:05, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]