User talk:Gen. Rhett
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Gen. Rhett! I noticed your contributions to Tennessee in the American Civil War and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
BLP alert
[edit]
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Snokalok (talk) 03:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
ANI notice
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Snokalok (talk) 06:27, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
July 2024
[edit]
Warning - Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at MrBeast, you may be blocked from editing. Isaidnoway (talk) 07:33, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 09:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)- Looking at your block, it appears that it is indefinite. This means that it will not expire on its own. If you wish to edit MrBeast again, you will have to appeal the block. Best regards, QwertyForest (talk) 10:35, 24 July 2024 (UTC).
- Hi! It looks like you have formatted your unblock request incorrectly. Would you like me to fix the formatting for you? QwertyForest (talk) 07:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Gen. Rhett (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I was blocked from editing the MrBeast Wikipedia simply because I undid the part where it said that Kris Tyson‘s allegations were false two times. I made it clear in my reasoning that I wasn’t trying to be transphobic or anything like that. I just wanted readers to know that the Tyson’s allegations and actions were in fact real, even though the main victim of the allegations has called them “Massive lies”. Keep in mind, there has been more than one allegation as well. I looked at the page again and found that the wording has been revised in a way to address the allegations without making them seem like they weren’t real. What’s the point of blocking me from editing something that was changed to address them better anyway? I request that I be unblocked from the MrBeast Wikipedia page.
Thanks for reading.
— Gen. Rhett Gen. Rhett (talk) 20:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You need to show a better understanding of why your edits went against WP:BLP. PhilKnight (talk) 14:09, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Helping with unblock request
[edit]Yes please and thank you @QwertyForest! Gen. Rhett (talk) 13:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, again. It seems like someone else already got round to it. Let me know if you need any other help. QwertyForest (talk) 16:39, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for offering, much appreciated. Gen. Rhett (talk) 16:43, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Unblock request for the MrBeast Wikipedia page
[edit]
Gen. Rhett (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
@PhilKnight I know I have violated a rule that I didn’t even know existed, which is completely my fault and I apologize. That wasn’t my intent. The way the section of the encyclopedia was written at the time wasn’t very clear compared to how it’s written now. It made the allegations seem like they were proven wrong, even though proof has been brought to the table regarding the allegations as well as other victims coming forward. How it is currently written, in my opinion, is a lot more clear and understandable without downplaying the situation or making it seem fake. I was trying to help unaware of my violation, and I got blocked in the process. I will learn from my mistakes. Gen. Rhett (talk) 17:10, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
(edit conflict with good advice, below) I think it's too soon to lift this partial block. You are still free to suggest edits on the article talk page. I think once you've had a few of those accepted without problems, that would be the time to request your partial block be lifted. This gives us a chance to see if you truly understand why your edit was inappropriate and a chance to see if you understand WP:BLP. Yamla (talk) 17:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Some unsolicited advice:
remove your unblock request,read WP:BLP (all of it), then open a new unblock request explaining how your previous edits violated the policy and what you will do to prevent future violations. Schazjmd (talk) 17:14, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm Bneu2013. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tennessee, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Since Wikipedia articles effectively function as summaries, we simply can't list every single thing that the state of Tennessee is known for, or every single fact about the state. Furthermore, this is currently a good article, and in order to ensure it retains this status it is often better to suggest improvements on the talk page first. Bneu2013 (talk) 05:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC) Bneu2013 (talk) 05:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at East Tennessee, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. glman (talk) 22:44, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Great Smoky Mountains, you may be blocked from editing. glman (talk) 12:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)