I would like your help in making two coats of arms. The first one is to replace the harp in this document with a Gaelic harp, but still use the version of St. Edward's crown. The second one is to replace the harp with a Gaelic harp and use the Tudor crown. version (please upload this version of the file separately)
Here you are. I can't update the original file for some reason, so I uploaded them separately. It allows for a different versions to exist. I hope you like them, I don't do much editing when it comes to things like this.
Royal Arms of the United Kingdom (Privy Council) St. Edwards Crown and Gaelic Harp
Could you please help me make a variant based on this coat of arms but with St. Edward's crown instead, as this coat of arms has been used in some places in the past (as a variant), just looking So far, there are no related svg files in Wiki related resources.
Please tell me how it is unsourced when the individual Wikipedia pages of the orders list him as Sovereign, Grand Master or both or are Wikipedia's own articles not accurate sources of information. For heavens sake, this platform is becoming a dictatorship. GandalfXLD (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, I'll accept the block but since I can't do it, thanks again, can you please remove Harry from there so others don't fall into the same trap. Apologies if I've come across a bit rude but this site frustrates with some of it's rules, which are often contradictory. Anyway, enjoy your day further. GandalfXLD (talk) 14:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See MOS:JOBTITLES. —Eyer (he/him) If you reply, add {{reply to|Eyer}} to your message. 12:31, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I would like to ask you to replace the tudor crown in these two files with other versions. The crown in the Orange River Colony coat of arms should use the 1901 version of the Tudor crown. The exception is the Flag of the Commander in Chief of Antigua and I think Barbuda's crown should be replaced with another version. Judging from the flag source he quoted, this version with reflection and shadow is not used, and judging from the actual use case of the Australian Royal Flag in 2024, it should be replaced with a non-reflective one and shaded version 2401:E180:8832:EE58:566:2717:C9CA:A46 (talk) 03:08, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can see why you'd want the crown for Antigua and Barbuda changed as they still have The King as Head of State but I don't quite see the reason for changing the crown for the Orange River Colony considering it hasn't existed since 1910. GandalfXLD (talk) 14:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just as you mentioned earlier, this kind of crown depiction is not very common.
However, regarding these two documents, have you considered restoring the previous versions? The versions of Edward VII and George V have already been changed back.
I raise this issue based on the idea of using the same crown. I think the files, especially File:Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom in Scotland (1837-1952).svg and File:Coat of arms of the United Kingdom (1901–1952).svg, should use the same version of the Tudor Crown. 2401:E180:8880:3B14:5F78:6DB3:BD5E:34CA (talk) 15:08, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Its all being done by the same user who seems to think he/she knows better and that the 1901 version differed from the present version when it actually looked quite similar. GandalfXLD (talk) 14:45, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've gone to the image for Antigua and Barbuda and I don't seem to have the ability to revert the image. I'd need to upload a whole new file. GandalfXLD (talk) 14:49, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The reason I bring up these three files is that they use a different crown than the other files. Dgp4004 used to replace the other files with this 1901 Tudor Crown, but it has been restored.
@GandalfXLDI would like to ask what you think. I think the crowns used in these images should be consistent, especially File:Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom in Scotland (1837-1952).svg. For example, the coat of arms used in areas outside Scotland does not use this version of the Tudor Crown, so I think these two files should be consistent. 112.105.131.66 (talk) 10:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop reverting current coats of arms to the previous stylization of the Tudor Crown. The newer stylization is used on the Royal website [1]. estar8806 (talk) ★20:03, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fine. Suit yourself. It's not like I have studied monarchy, history, and heraldry and would actually know better. Enjoy your evening. GandalfXLD (talk) 20:10, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi @GandalfXLD, I see that you changed the number of MPs of Tisza. Please note that electoral results are not actual party seats until the new session of the National Assembly starts it work. Additionally, as indicated right above the composition bars, the data should not be entered manually but will be automatically grabbed from Wikidata. Julius Schwarz (talk) 09:41, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I also see that you edited Wikidata. Please note that values should not merely be changed, but an end date should be added to the current value, and a new value should be created with relevant qualifiers, including start date, legislative body, parliamentary term, source, etc. Julius Schwarz (talk) 09:43, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It appears I need to take time to learn this system. It used to be just editing the party's wikipedia page. I'll be sure to learn before making anymore edits. GandalfXLD (talk) 09:47, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No worries at all, and new editors, including to Wikidata, are very welcome. Wikidata takes a bit of getting used, but it is not that difficult after the few first edits. Just have a look at current values. The most important part is probably non-destructive edits: do not change information, but add new values with relevant qualifiers (and mark the new value as preferred, which highlights it in green). On the Wikipedia side, a template grabs values from Wikidata for composition bars and other elements. Julius Schwarz (talk) 09:53, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
_St._Edwards_Crown_and_Gaelic_Harp.svg)
_Tudor_Crown_and_Gaelic_Harp.svg)
.svg)
_3D.svg)
.svg)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Duarte Pio, Duke of Braganza. DrKay (talk) 17:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See MOS:JOBTITLES. —Eyer (he/him) If you reply, add 
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. I'm intrigued as to why you thought this was acceptable. Please stay in the top three sections of the triangle. That was in the bottom two. Cremastra (talk) 22:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Henri, Grand Duke of Luxembourg, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
