User talk:GZhong

Welcome!

Hello, Magiciandsrk!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, MartinPoulter (talk) 21:58, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cicero revert

please don't attribute the vandalism to me. the Jesus Christ edit was an anonymous edit after my edit. Duncnbiscuit (talk) 21:11, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duncnbiscuit, I think you might have read the summary message mistakenly?
It just says where did I revert from who to who and revision number. And lastly the reason in bold.
|Reverting edit(s) by ~2026-42610-6 (talk)| to |rev. 1333329868 by Duncnbiscuit| : Vandalism (UV 0.1.6).
Its an automatized message by Ultraviolet. G Zhong 22:09, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

yes, of course you are right :-D Duncnbiscuit (talk) 23:01, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello GZhong! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Rollback Request timeline, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Elisa E. Konofagou page

Hello. I just noticed that 2 days ago, on the Elisa E. Konofagou page, after I fixed a typo (changed "is" to "in"), you reverted my edit by clicking the "no reliable source" icon from Ultraviolet. I'm now wondering, why did you do that? I wasn't adding any content. I was just fixing a typo in content that was already added. It previously said something like "lives is New York" instead of "lives in New York", which clearly didn't make sense. That "no realiable source" button should only be used to revert edits involving adding unsourced content where sources should be added. That's clearly not what I did. I've now again restored by fixing that typo in that sentence. Please don't revert the edit again. Otherwise, there will be a clear grammatical error in the sentence. Thank you. Janan2025 (talk) 21:44, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The revert was for user Wike2026 for adding doctor title and living in New York. As per the reason why I've retracted the notification on your talk page (see history). That sentence shouldn't exist without the source. that's why the no reliable source as revert. And that's why the revert of is to in, was part of revert. G Zhong 23:24, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

But I believe I have reverted to wrong version, which I apologize. As such I've remove content that has unsupported claims. G Zhong 23:32, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]