User talk:Fabinho44

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I'm Liu1126. I noticed that in this edit to List of A24 films, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liu1126 (talk) 18:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2026

Hello, I noticed that you recently removed content from Terminator (franchise) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -Fnlayson (talk) 13:43, 29 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at The Terminator, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:48, 29 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

May 2026

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at The Terminator, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop removing content without providing any explanation. DonIago (talk) 18:22, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to set Preferences → Editing → Editor → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary). Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 07:14, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Raging Bull. Peaceray (talk) 07:15, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Better references

I notice that you have added CinemaScore references to various film articles over the years, this is good. (Even very recently(diff)) Thank you for your edits, but with a small change it could be even better.

I notice that you are using an empty search box, a link to CinemaScore.com as a reference, this is bad, but better than nothing and other people have been doing it for years so you might have been mislead by bad examples into thinking it was a good thing. (See WP:V and WP:LINKROT.)

I would greatly appreciate if you would consider, where possible, to link to an actual reliable source. (For example in the article Your Highness I added a reference to Deadline Hollywood.(diff) instead.) Sources such as Deadline Hollywood or sometimes Indiewire publish CinemaScore grades. Sometimes CinemaScore will post on Twitter/X, and historically other sources such as The Hollywood Reporter, Box Office Mojo, or Entertainment Weekly would occasionally CinemaScore listings.

Thanks for your time.

signed: Former wiki editor who still lurks sometimes. -- ~2026-20754-35 (talk) 00:51, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It really would help if you followed the WP:SIMPLE rules and explained your changes with a meaningful edit summary. -- ~2026-20754-35 (talk) 16:39, 19 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

May 2026 block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours because for disruptively removing cited material without an explanation in the edit summary, as you did at Scream (franchise) and Scream (1996 film). Please note that this is not necessarily an assessment of faith or character, and we welcome good faith edits that are also constructive and in line with our policies. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page. Peaceray (talk) 07:26, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]