Hi, just wanting to let you know, since you created a second account, there should be a statement on you userpage that this account belongs to the same person as your first one. See also WP:SOCKLEGIT on legitimate uses of multiple accounts. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:39, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CostalCal were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Not too many significant tornadoes. Lacks reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Hello, ELLEWEATHERRRR!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CostalCal (talk) 05:24, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited March 13–17, 2026 North American storm complex, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Hi! I am a resident in Oregon, and I noticed you mentioned the 2020 Oregon Fires in your User Page, which I find really cool, and I have to ask, did you hear about the Santiam Fire that occurred in Clackamas, Marion, Jefferson, and Linn Counties? sorry, I have a feeling it's somewhat forgotten and I just wanted to ask, sorry, but Hi! :D HunterDSi (talk) 18:07, 24 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The page has been reviewed. Some minor adjustments were made based on the sources provided. Be cautious of storytelling -there were some missing facts - I also think the page would benefit from additional sourcing. I hope this helps!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|FiddleheadLady}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Umais Bin Sajjad, left the following feedback:
Declining for now. The event may be notable, but the draft does not yet clearly justify a standalone article separate from List of European tornadoes in 2026, which already covers the 3 May event and confirmed tornadoes. Show that this is a proper WP:SPINOFF rather than duplicated list content per WP:CFORK. The draft also relies heavily on ESWD/database entries for detailed damage-path prose; add more independent reliable secondary coverage per WP:RS and WP:V. Also fix the references section, as the current grouped reflist does not display the normal inline citations properly.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of European tornadoes in 2026, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vento was added.
yes I'm sure, there are videos of the tornado at Akçamezra and it didn't have a satellite, also the surveyor found IF4 damage there so i doubt it's a different tornado. ELLEWEATHERRRR (talk) 18:19, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
also ı couldn't find any videos could you please send me a video? ım currently researching it and curently ı couldn't find any videos StormL00ver (talk) 18:25, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It's okay for you copy directly from the NOAA website or any other public domain material, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. This is done by simply adding the template {{source-attribution}} after your citation. Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself, and that it's okay to copy verbatim or lightly reworded. Thanks, — Diannaa🍁 (talk) 20:20, 24 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
also the photo in the start of the list of european tornadoes article belongs to Akçamezra Tornado you can'T just write kayacık viranşehir tornado on it StormL00ver (talk) 05:01, 24 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Reporter: Zubar Nazar / updated: Thilo Kühne (ESSL)
A destructive tornado passed directly through Kushva, striking a residential area. According to reports, the event occurred at approximately 18:30 local Ural time (YEKT, UTC+5). Extensive structural damage was reported: numerous roofs were blown off or severely damaged, and multiple outbuildings were completely destroyed. A cinder block second floor of a residential building was entirely ripped away. Fences throughout the area were blown down and destroyed. Concrete utility poles were snapped and knocked down. Widespread tree damage occurred, with many trees uprooted and several snapped in half. Note: Some of the reported damage was not captured on video but was described directly by an eyewitness. The number of casualties is currently unknown. 16 people were injured this is the description for the kushva tornado StormL00ver (talk) 05:04, 24 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Reporter: Jonathan Stichnoth (Voluntary Observer Person)
[Update, 12/05/26: +Damage survey by Jonathan Stichnoth (VOP)] A strong tornado affected several villages in Syria and Turkey. The tornado touched down in fields south of Ajjasza (Ayaşa/Aiyasha), a farming town in Northern Syria located near the Turkish border. The circulation was initially weak and embedded in heavy hail; however, it quickly intensified to IF2 strength as it impacted the town, where structural damage was reported to roofs and walls, and power lines and utility poles were bent or collapsed. Between Ajjasza and the nearby town of Silsila (Silsile), numerous strong pistachio trees sustained heavy damage, with many being uprooted, snapped, or debranched. Silsila was then hit on the western edge by the tornado, where there was damage to vegetation and structures, with many houses losing roofs or walls. The tornado then crossed the border into Turkey, where it impacted the Turkish town of Çangallı (Çankallı). Maintaining IF2 intensity, roofs were damaged, power lines were downed, and a power transmission tower collapsed. The circulation then began to rapidly shrink, going from a width of around 600 meters to just 30 meters. It began to turn northwest in an attempted occlusion, but failed and made a loop over fields just west of İnkılap before continuing northeast. It remained weak with a deviant path before restabilizing on a nearly northward track, where it reached its maximum width of around 650 meters. It passed by the village of Çaybeyi, where intense damage was done to utility poles and outbuildings along a stretch of road west of the village at at least IF2.5 intensity. At least one outbuilding was completely demolished, and nearby trees were snapped/debranched. Continuing north, the tornado reached peak strength in the village of Akçamezra, where roofs were destroyed, utility poles collapsed, trailers and a semi-truck were respectively thrown/overturned, and several buildings received significant structural damage. On the southeastern side of the village, a solid brick/masonry construction home with ~30cm thick walls with some stucco/veneer reinforcement was heavily damaged. Based on aerial and ground-level imagery, it was determined that >50% of the structure’s walls collapsed. A nearby car was also picked up and tossed/rolled several meters. The damage at this area was of IF3 intensity [BSD/1B]. More damage up to IF2.5 intensity was recorded as the tornado tracked through the eastern part of the village, and another area of IF3 damage occurred when the tornado hit farmhouses on the outskirts of town. Several farmhouses received significant damage, and one was almost completely destroyed with just part of one wall remaining. The construction was also solid brick/stone masonry around 30-40cm thick, though connections within the walls seemed weak and were not reinforced, so a lower sturdiness class was applied [BSC/2]. The tornado moved through rural areas and crop fields until it reached east of Kayacık, where it damaged the roof of some farm buildings before crossing a highway. A van driving on the road was thrown into a nearby field, injuring 2 occupants. The tornado continued through the field, damaging trees and the roofs of farm buildings south of Karadibek before dissipating over some hills. [Approximate timeframe: 12:10 - 12:40 UTC, based on satellite data. Damage survey conducted through analysis of damage photos/drone shots and satellite imagery. Rating: At least 2 instances of IF3 damage were found; Location 1 (SE Akçamezra): Structure with ~30cm thick walls, solid brick/stone masonry, lightly reinforced adding durability warrants at least class D sturdiness, analysis of satellite imagery of undamaged structure vs drone imagery of damage shows >50% walls collapse, giving BSD/DoD 1B = IF3; Location 2 (Akçamezra outskirts): Group of farmhouses received heavy damage, construction is masonry with presumably poor connections with thickness of around 30-40cm, warrants class C sturdiness, damage photos show one particular farmhouse was nearly leveled with one partial wall remaining, giving BSC/DoD 2 = IF3; supported by car displacement in location 1.] and this is for the akçamezra tornado StormL00ver (talk) 05:05, 24 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Kushva
Sverdlovsk Oblast, Russia
22/06/2026 18:40 UTC
(+/- 30 minutes)
Reporter: z60230411@gmail.com
A destructive, long-lived tornado struck Kushva (Sverdlovsk Oblast) on June 22, 2026. While official regional sources preliminarily suggest an upper EF3 rating, specific physical damage markers clearly indicate localized peak intensities reaching F4 levels. In the zone of maximum destruction near 118 Kommuna Street, a massive residential building made of brick and cinder block underwent complete structural disintegration: the second floor was entirely leveled, and the building blocks were pulverized into fine debris. Furthermore, video footage and eyewitness testimonies confirm the aerodynamic lifting and significant airborne transport of heavy, non-aerodynamic objects, including individual cinder blocks, massive log cabin timbers, and a two-ton UAZ SUV. The debris scattering pattern indicates true airborne transport rather than a simple weight-bearing collapse of the walls, which fully satisfies the criteria for an F4 rating. ELLEWEATHERRRR (talk) 05:06, 24 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
i dont think you're understanding me, the IF scale is based on 1 second winds while the EF scale is based on 3 second winds. therefore an IF4 isnt equivalent to an EF5. ELLEWEATHERRRR (talk) 05:14, 24 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
it is like the El reno tornado even it had windspeeds above 200 mph the damage survey said that it didn't done much damage so it is rated an EF3 StormL00ver (talk) 05:26, 24 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
ı know they are QC0 this is why I'm saying we can't say kushva is stronger than akçamezra also we have damage photage of akçamezra while kushva... StormL00ver (talk) 05:34, 24 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
yeah and Kushva did this: "a massive residential building made of brick and cinder block underwent complete structural disintegration: the second floor was entirely leveled, and the building blocks were pulverized into fine debris."
So why do you keep re-editing it just write akçamezra-kayacık tornado? just writing kayacık will confuse it with the IF1.5 Kayacık tornado StormL00ver (talk) 06:05, 24 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what to tell you, they are different scales made by different people. A lot of people thinks the EF scale underrates tornadoes and the IF scale overrates tornadoes. That's not our job to figure out, we just write what the sources say. Tetradisulfate (talk) 05:14, 24 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
thats the 1 second winds, it's different when you go by 3 second wind gusts. I don't know why you're arguing when me and @Tetradisulfate are clearly right, this isnt that big of a deal, both will get official ratings by mid-july ELLEWEATHERRRR (talk) 05:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
These two ratings are QC0 (general public reports) on the ESWD, essentially meaning that a non-reliable source studied the damage. For example with the (potentially) IF4 in Russia, the report came in from a non-verified Gmail account. Once these two reach QCO+ (plausibility-checked reports) then we can add them. Tetradisulfate (talk) 05:11, 24 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
also this tornado had windspeed of 77 m/s which isn't enough for an IF4 rating and this tornado lasted 15 minutes which makes it suspicious for a major tornado.Also the article says it is a EF3,F4 and IF4 which doesn't make any sense. StormL00ver (talk) 06:52, 24 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
it says "While official regional sources preliminary suggest an upper EF3 rating" which means some sources say it was an EF3/IF3, but the report says why it's an F4/IF4 ELLEWEATHERRRR (talk) 07:03, 24 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
yup i saw, the preliminary rating for Kushva might happen within the next week, and the final rating for akçamezra will come out >July 5th, as the damage surveyor is gone until then, and needs to make their report QC0+ (as they're a VOP so they can do that) then ESWD will make the report final sometime in July maybe early August! ^^ ELLEWEATHERRRR (talk) 15:11, 24 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Also,After doing a closer review of the radar and satellite datas, I realized this system which produced Akçamezra Tornado was 550 km wide and is actually a massive Mesoscale Convective Complex (MCC).
This system featured highly organized embedded supercells along its leading southern edge. This system managed to drop 13 out of 14 confirmed tornadoes during its 13.5-hour lifespan.
Разрушительный долгоживущий смерч обрушился на Кушву (Свердловская область) 22 июня 2026 года. В то время как официальные региональные источники предварительно указывают на верхнюю границу категории EF3, конкретные физические маркеры повреждений четко указывают на локальные пики интенсивности уровня F4. В зоне максимальных разрушений в районе улицы Коммуны, 118, массивное жилое здание из кирпича и шлакоблока подверглось полной структурной дезинтеграции: второй этаж полностью сровнен с землей, а строительные блоки разбиты в мелкую крошку. Кроме того, видеозаписи и свидетельства очевидцев подтверждают аэродинамический подъем и значительный воздушный перенос тяжелых неаэродинамических объектов, включая отдельные шлакоблоки, массивные бревна срубов и двухтонный внедорожник УАЗ. Характер разлета обломков указывает на их транспортировку по воздуху, а не на простое обрушение стен под тяжестью веса, что полностью соответствует критериям категории F4.
Location in Local Script
Кушва, Свердловская область
Detailed Location
улица Коммунная, дом 118. Тут пик торнадо практически полностью уничтожил крепкий каменный дом с монолитным фундаментом, Торнадо уничтожил его наполовину.
Total Duration
15 min
Number of Fatalities
0
Number of Injured
21
Number of Missing Persons
0
Impacts
Roads impassable or closed
Power supply damaged or interrupted
Telecommunications damaged or interrupted
Damage to roofs or chimneys
Roofs destroyed
Damage to windows or insulation
Walls (partially) collapsed
Buildings (almost) completely destroyed
Cars damaged
Cars dented
Car windows or windshields broken
Cars lifted or moved
Large branches broken
Trees uprooted or snapped
Forests damaged or destroyed
Fields or crops damaged
Greenhouses damaged
Evacuation by authorities
Information Source
Damage Photo
Eye Witness of Damage
Eye Witness
Website
Newspaper
Weather Service
Government/Administrative Authorities
External URLs
Hi, I hope you're doing well and you're safe, I heard on the news about those wildfires in Utah so I hope you're doing well and are safe. :) Ari1600!🇺🇲🇭🇳18:59, 26 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
thank you!! The worst of the fires are mainly in the southern portion of the state and i live in the northern portion but conditions are definitely getting worse, thanks for checking in!^^ ELLEWEATHERRRR (talk) 19:31, 26 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Marincyclist. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tornadoes of 2026, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Marincyclist (talk) 02:49, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Getting Started
Tips
