Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Lynch44, left the following feedback:
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Next steps
Edit Draft:Kucharek (brand) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Hi! I feel that I need your help in editing this article. Could you point out which sources and fragments of article have to be removed or changed? DoradcaSmaku1 (talk) 11:52, 26 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, DoradcaSmaku1!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lynch4414:18, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, HitroMilanese, left the following feedback:
Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Next steps
Edit Draft:Kucharek (brand) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
I am writing to you with a request for help and specific guidance. I am submitting an article about the Kucharek brand (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kucharek_(brand) for the second time, and unfortunately the text still does not meet Wikipedia’s requirements. Could you please indicate, for example, specific passages that I should remove or change so that the article can be accepted?
I am also trying to understand the mechanism behind how this type of article works. Why, for example, was Kamis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamis) accepted with only three sources? The first source comes from the Wayback Machine, and the second article is already quite outdated. Moreover, there is an error at the very beginning, because Kamis has not been a Polish brand for a long time.
Similarly, McCormick (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCormick_%26_Company), which largely uses archived sources from its own website, even though one of the arguments for rejecting the Kucharek text at some point was not to use any references in any way connected to the company.
