User talk:Dmm1169

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2022/November; 2022/December; 2023/January; 2023/February; 2023/March; 2023/April; 2023/May; 2023/June; 2023/July; 2023/September; 2023/October; 2023/November; 2024/March; 2024/October; 2024/November; 2025/April; 2025/May; 2025/August; 2025/September; 2025/November; 2026/January;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

.

★

User:Jgstokes/Area (LDS Church)/August 2026

Hello. There is a problem with the above-named user subpage in view of the fact that, starting in 2026, some area presidencies will have the standard 3members while others will have four. I tried to correctly algin this in view of that decision and have somehow apparently messsed up the alignment on the Africa West Area section. Since you were the one who originally suggested overhauling the area page to its' current status, I figured that if anyone had the know-how to fix this, it would be you.THnanks. User:Jgstokes (talk)—We can disagree without becoming disagreeable. 15:42, 24 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Jgstokes, this is a 3-column table. To keep things from being very complicated, I propose keeping it as a 3-column table. I replaced the contents for the row with:

| colspan=3 style="text-align: center;" |

Area president: Name (reference)

Counselors: Name2, Name3, and Name4

Which you can do the same for the others

Colspan=3 combines the three columns
style="text-align: center;" centers the text within the cell

Let me know what you think or if you want it a different way.

Thanks -Dmm1169 (talk) 20:40, 24 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That is perfect. Thank you. I can implement these changes across the board as time and my circumstances allow me to do so over the next few days.This is an inspired solution. Thanks again/ User:Jgstokes (talk)—We can disagree without becoming disagreeable. 14:42, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have implemented those changes acrross the board, and they all seem to be formatted properly and working well, with the exception of an issue with the United States West Area Presidency, for which I cannot get that mysterious extra column to go away. Anything you can think of that might help would be appreciated. Thanks for walking me through this adjustment. User:Jgstokes (talk)—We can disagree without becoming disagreeable. 20:47, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Cagayan de Oro Philippines Temple

Hello, Dmm1169,

Thank you for creating Cagayan de Oro Philippines Temple.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article. It needs independent sources, for example reviews of the building’s design or setting, and – as another example – perhaps something independently verifiable about the local significance of its mission.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Northernhenge}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Northernhenge (talk) 20:13, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Northernhenge:, I agree independent sources are needed. It may have some local significance. However, I currently believe it's best as a redirect as the pertinent information is already in the destination page. Thanks - Dmm1169 (talk) 02:27, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks – I see that I sent the notification to the wrong person. (It defaults to the creator of the article even if they created it as a redirect.) Apologies --Northernhenge (talk) 12:27, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cagayan de Oro Philippines Temple

The article Cagayan de Oro Philippines Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Originally created as a redirect, this article was then written but it was subsequently tagged for third-party and promotional tone. Since then it has been reverted to a redirect, and then reverted again to an article, several times. It remains blatantly promotional (wp:NOTPROMO) and lacks independent reliable third party sources.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

Northernhenge (talk) 12:38, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]