Jump to content

User talk:David Teckdens

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pathaan (2023 film) (June 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SlySabre was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Per WP:TOOSOON, I would recommend waiting until the film is closer towards release so then more information will become available over time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
SlySabre (talk) 01:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, David Teckdens! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SlySabre (talk) 01:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pathaan (2023 film) (July 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onmyway22 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
WP:TOO SOON and the attempts seems to be WP:PAID.

The history shows there's is an another draft Draft:Pathaan (film) which was REJECTED

Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pathan (film) which the author blocked as WP:SOCKPUPPET.

The author of this article might also be a possible sock!
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Onmyway22 talk 04:30, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Robert McClenon. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Robert McClenon that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You insulted someone, calling them 'dumbass', but we don't know who. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:58, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Onmyway22 talk 05:18, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pathaan (film) (August 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This unreleased film still does not satisfy film notability and does not appear to satisfy general notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 19:01, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]