User talk:Danglerofhell

Danglerofhell, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Danglerofhell! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Geek's Guide to the Galaxy. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Daniel Greene has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Daniel Greene. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Working with others

Welcome to Wikipedia. I am a fairly active helper at the help desk. Each of us is a volunteer who takes on whatever tasks we choose to do. Many of us will simply avoid you and your problems unless you remain civil, so when you encounter a problem that you feel is caused by some editor, it's better not to then go to the help desk and say "f*** you Wikipedia", because we may choose to ignore you. -Arch dude (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Okey-dokey, @Arch dude! I was in a bad mood. I'm sorry.

No problems. It's hard to get used to a collaborative web site run by 100,000 active volunteers with basically no coordination whatsoever. That's why I told you about this. I hope you hang around and help us. -Arch dude (talk) 15:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Greene (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs a lot more external news sourcing and has too much personal detail rather than career stuff.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Greene and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daniel Greene, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Breach of Peace (novella) (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This page has been moved back from article space to draft space. Please read the comments by the draftifying reviewer and address them. Do not resubmit this draft without addressing the comments of the previous reviewer. If you do not understand why this article was sent back to draft space, ask the reviewer rather than simply resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it will almost certainly be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a partial block may be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

Amazon and Youtube are not reliable sources.

This is an unpublished book, and unpublished books normally do not satisfy book notability or general notability.

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required disclosures.

You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.

This draft has been declined because of notability concerns. This draft should be resubmitted by addressing the notability concerns in AFC comments or on the talk page of the draft. Do not resubmit this draft without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion. Do not simply add references, or make minor changes, without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion.

This does not mean that the subject of the draft has been found not to be notable. It does mean that this draft, as written, does not establish notability. Notability should be established in the text of the draft, as well as by references.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Breach of Peace (novella) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Breach of Peace (novella), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CarnageConcept1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CarnageConcept1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Carnagefromtrailer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Carnagefromtrailer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Good Article icon

Hello! I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions has been undone because it added the Good Article template to Nuclear weapon, an article that has not been promoted by the Good Article Nomination process. If you believe that this article meets the Good Article Criteria, then you are encouraged to nominate it for review by following the Good Article nominating instructions. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Good Article Nominations talk page. Thank you. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 14:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Please do not tag articles as "good", as you did with article Time with this edit, and with article J. Robert Oppenheimer with this edit, unless the article is officially promoted by the Good Article Nomination process. - DVdm (talk) 17:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Danglerofhell, if you'll try clicking some of the links (the blue text) in the messages you were left above, you'll find all the information you need to understand the process. There is a set of criteria that an article must satisfy to be listed as a Good Article; if you believe an article meets that standard, you can nominate it for review by an uninvolved editor, who will assess it against those criteria and give feedback. If the reviewer comes to agree that the article meets the criteria, then the article passes the review and is promoted to Good Article status. Feel free to ask any specific questions you have once you've read the instructions. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 12:41, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trevor Henderson (July 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Doric Loon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Sorry, but after being declined and reworked twice, this draft still has not reached the stage of establishing notability. Given that a mainspace article which presumably had simiar content was deleted on GNG grounds last year, I think we are at the end of the road with this. I recommend trying again in five years if the subject's career blossoms in the meantime. Otherwise, forget it.

Doric Loon (talk) 12:00, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Daniel Greene

Hello, Danglerofhell. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniel Greene, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dark One (Wheel of Time)

Hello, Danglerofhell. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dark One (Wheel of Time), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)