User talk:Cwooodside79

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page FileNet do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. This applies to all your edits to date. --Ronz 00:54, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Wyatt Riot 00:32, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

cmswatch links

Hi – I've noticed you have been adding links to cmswatch and other editors have been removing them. When a new user adds only links to the same site it raises red flags to more experienced editors because it is associated with promotion of a particular website.

What is your interest in or affiliation with cmswatch? Disclosing this information helps other editors understand your pattern of edits.

I am somewhat interested in the cmswatch site because it provides a secondary source of information which is missing from so many of the CMS application articles here on Wikipedia. The CMS articles mostly do not provide the reliable, independent sources required by the verifiability policy of Wikipeida. CMSWatch may provide that, so I am interested in knowing what you know about that site and other reviewers of CMS products. I'll look for your response here. Although all (or most) of the links you added have been removed, some of them may actually be appropriate and help verify information in a way the improves certain articles. ✤ JonHarder ^talk 02:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]