User talk:Crs5827

Talk page

Talk page Crs5827 (talk) 03:49, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Crs5827. Thank you for your work on Rogers Behavioral Health. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work! Please just add a source for the last sentence. Have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:37, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mariamnei: thanks for reviewing it!

The last sentence "As a result, they ended two jobs that supported the program." is attributed to the same source (The Journal Sentinel) as the previous sentence "In response to an executive order by President Trump, Rogers ended their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) program in May 2025." so I moved the citation to the end of the graph. Is that satisfactory, or do I need to cite it after each sentence?

Thanks! Crs5827 (talk) 21:57, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments, and I'm sorry I missed this. I recommend duplicating the note to make it clear. Have a great day! Mariamnei (talk) 12:26, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American Behavioral Healthcare Providers has been nominated for deletion

Category:American Behavioral Healthcare Providers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 17:16, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American behavioral healthcare providers that offer higher levels of care has been nominated for deletion

Category:American behavioral healthcare providers that offer higher levels of care has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 17:16, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Crs5827 Please review how categorization works before making more categories.^SMason_Garrison 19:10, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed how it works. Is there something specific you'd like to mention? Crs5827 (talk) 04:20, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Defining would be a really good thing for you to get a handle on so that you can make effective arguments in CFD^SMason_Garrison 12:05, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay will do. Thank you. Crs5827 (talk) 21:46, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2026

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 06:23, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]