User talk:ChoFluid

Welcome!

Hi ChoFluid! I noticed your contributions to Carrier Ethernet and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ~Kvng (talk) 15:12, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Remsense 🌈 论 11:42, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 10:48, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read information paragraphs above and stop adding totally unnecessary links, per WP:OVERLINK. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 11:19, 11 June 2025 (UTC) s[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 05:52, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Meditation. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. tgeorgescu (talk) 11:15, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rekhachithram. Epicion (talk) 04:03, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 15:30, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Organic chemistry. If you keep doing what got you blocked last time, it will get you blocked promptly and for longer this time. DMacks (talk) 13:58, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 10:17, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Remsense 🌈 论 10:00, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 10:13, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]