Jump to content

User talk:ChezVees

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfC notification: Draft:Jack Vees has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jack Vees. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Vees (March 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hermera34 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment they left was:
I don't see the notability of WP:MUSICBIO being satisfied.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hermera34 (talk) 19:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! ChezVees, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hermera34 (talk) 19:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Vees (March 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:24, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

[edit]

Based on your username....

Information icon Hello, ChezVees. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
  • instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. LaMona (talk) 00:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Vees (March 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:
A number of problems. One, you have long lists of works, but a) you don't say what they are (his compositions? works he's performed?) b) none of this is sourced such that it can be verified. Also, it is better to have a short list of especially important works and provide links at the end of the article to a source of the full list. (Lists do not really provide information and are not interesting reading.) Next, you need to weed out the references that are not what we call reliable sources (such as the TekPercussion database which is a wiki and therefore not usable as a source), and see if you can just keep ones that actually say something about him, not just mention his name.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 00:52, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]