User talk:Case Against

Hello there

I love Wikipedia. I did start an article / page but I think I might have started in the wrong place eg in my user page. Is there a way of recovering the work? Case Against (talk) 18:09, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia: click on the Introduction link to get started!

Introduction
Simplified ruleset		Your first article
The five pillars		Manual of Style
Task Center		More help pages...

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Do not use AI chatbots or large language models when editing Wikipedia. Their use is nearly always prohibited.

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.

Maintain a neutral point of view.

Take particular care while writing about a living person. Controversial and negative statements must be referenced with multiple reliable sources.

Don't edit war or abuse multiple accounts.

If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.

Do not add advertising, promotional messages, or text that is not related to an article's subject.

Use talk pages to discuss article improvements, but not as a forum for general discussions.

If you have any questions, ask them on the Teahouse or on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 00:55, 18 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norma Procter (June 18)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, HitroMilanese, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Norma Procter to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Hitro talk 06:34, 18 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Case Against! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 06:34, 18 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Case Against! Your additions to Draft:Norma Procter have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:13, 21 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure I completely understand your edits in terms of removal of newspaper articles (Wales online) which are freely available to access. Could someone explain why citing newspapers is not allowed?

The theme of the photos I will clear up with an email from the photographer.

Many thanks Case Against (talk) 01:36, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You say they "appear" to have copyrighted material - couldn't you double check before deleting as obviously my work is in good faith and in my own time as much as yours. The main thing is to make a strong contribution and I am open to that process but don't understand the removal of content. Case Against (talk) 01:38, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The content was removed because it was a match for prose already published online. Newspapers, magazines, and other written material is protected by copyright, whether online or in print. Our copyright policy does not allow copyright material to be added to the encyclopedia. Your sources should be used as a source of information, not of prose. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:25, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]