User talk:Camogie History

Welcome!

Hello, Camogie History, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! J Milburn (talk) 00:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naming

Please do not add "camogie player" after players' names. It is unnecessary and contravenes WP:NAME. Thanks, WWGB (talk) 14:15, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As he said. The normal principle is to have the person's name only ("John Smith", for example). If there is already something at John Smith, you have John Smith (camogie player). Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 00:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to reiterate what has been said above.. again. Please, be cautious and follow what we've advised. Ironholds (talk) 00:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Please do start taking notice of this- we do have naming guidelines, and it's best when our articles stick to them. If there is not an article at the person's name, just create it there. If there is, then the title should be Joe Bloggs (camogie player)- note the parenthesis and non-capitals. I guess you just haven't read these notes yet. Currently, people are moving the articles to the correct titles, but it would be great if you could just create them at the correct location in the future. Other than that detail, things look fine, so welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks a lot for your contributions! If you need any help, you're welcome to contact me on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 00:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As 4 other editors have pointed out, the titles you have been giving articles are a problem and it's creating work for others. Please read over WP:PRECISION and WP:NAME before creating any further articles. .--RadioFan (talk) 01:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, Camogie History, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because This username implies some sort of an official designation. You should consider changing your username,. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. RadioFan (talk) 01:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Football History or Tennis History wouldn't cause anyone to bat an eyelid. Fences&Windows 01:22, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to create pages with inappropriate titles, you will be blocked from editing. PLEASE READ WP:NAME BEFORE CREATING ANYTHING ELSE. RadioFan (talk) 01:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Therese Maher, Camogie Player, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PLEASE READ WP:NAME BEFORE CREATING ANYTHING ELSE. iBen^discuss 01:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Camogie

Hi there. I love the work you've done as the subject badly needs it. However, please do abide by guidelines. I found many of them strange when I first started but they are there for a reason. Plus the fact that, just like camogie, when you join a club you play by its rules. Please don't get browned off with the admins, as the sport badly needs you on Wikipedia. Gra mor, Fergananim (talk) 02:35, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arlene Cushen

The article Arlene Cushen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of meeting Notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ttonyb (talk) 16:10, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nell McCarthy

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nell McCarthy, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://m.rte.ie/sport/gaa/2009/0218/camogie.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:47, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've created dozens of these articles, of questionable notability as is. Have you copied these from another source? Shadowjams (talk) 08:05, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Camogie Association

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Camogie Association, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Camogie Association of Ireland. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:47, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Camogie Association of Ireland a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Triwbe (talk) 09:00, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Nell McCarthy has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Some text was directly copied from http://m.rte.ie/sport/gaa/2009/0218/camogie.html Triwbe (talk) 09:25, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Camogie Association of Ireland. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Triwbe (talk) 11:32, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Joan O'Flynn.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Joan O'Flynn.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 10:53, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No articles for many names Many of the people mentioned have no article attached. Need to remove the link Pmunited (talk) 15:17, 11 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

External links

Thank you for all your contributions, you've done a lot of work. Unfortunately, in most articles the linkfarms in the external links sections are inappropriate, and should all be removed. I have done a good handful of them, but all the other articles will also have to be cleaned. You might want to have a look at our external links guideline, which shows you which links are, and which are not appropriate. Most of your links fail the point that they are not directly linked to the subject. E.g. on Áine Codd I have removed all the links to the association, the ball, and local websites. Only the first one is about Áine Codd, the others are about organisations that she is somehow related to, but not directly about her. Those links should be on their own wikipedia pages. I hope this explains.

Could you please help in making the external links sections in all the articles conform this? Thanks. And don't hesitate to contact me if you have further questions. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 15:25, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have tried to re-establish links where none exist. Please see notes above. Please remove links where none exist. Most of the schools in the colleges section have no links. Pmunited (talk) 01:34, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Caitriona Ruan to Caitriona Ryan

I assume that these are the same person. Mrchris (talk) 01:56, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Camogie History, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 19:04, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Camogie History (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

Inaccuracies inserted in many camogie pages need to be corrected

Decline reason:

Yes, but ... you were blocked for a username violation, which this request doesn't address at all. Use {{unblock-un}} to propose a new username for yourself. — Daniel Case (talk) 12:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Daniel Case (talk) 12:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC)}}[reply]

Nomination of Síle Horgan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Síle Horgan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ww2censor (talk) 11:14, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eilish Redmond for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eilish Redmond is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BSOleader (talk • contribs) 16:41, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin

The article Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO like the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan, with others opting to unanimously delete those. Sports officials are not covered by WP:NGAELIC. Nor is a playing career that did not go past university level, even if it led to Ashbourne Cup medals. The single source provided is one page (460) in a book. This book was written by another president of the same organisation so can hardly be classed as independent. This BLP? (it is unclear if the subject is deceased or living) has remained in this state for more than a decade, with neither the creator nor others doing anything to improve it in that time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

I apologise for my choice of "fails" as the first word and have exchanged it for "does not meet". I hope this did not appear hostile to you. You do not seem to have edited for a while. Please include sources that are independent of the subject so that the article can be saved. Did her playing career consist of any senior inter-county games? Playing for UCD (or any university) is never enough for a separate biography. --Gaois (talk) 23:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chris O'Connell

The article Chris O'Connell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO like the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan, with others opting to unanimously delete those. Sports officials are not covered by WP:NGAELIC. Nor is a playing career that did not go past local club level, even if her sister was there with her. Unspecified people called Paddy, Mick, Matt and Sean may have won hurling honours but this does not contribute to notability, nor do the activities of the four cousins, her (unclear) involvement with two others in a joint achievement and what the special congress in 1964 decided to allow. One of the sources provided is a page (460) in a book. This book was written by another president of the same organisation so can hardly be classed as independent. The same page was used as the single reference for Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin, which suggests more of a list on that page than anything significant. There are links to the Camogie Association website and the website of her club but these are not independent either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

--Gaois (talk) 01:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lil O'Grady

The article Lil O'Grady has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO like the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan, with others opting to unanimously delete those. Sports officials are not covered by WP:NGAELIC. Nor is being one of three selectors of an award. The single source provided is one page (460) in a book. This book was written by another president of the same organisation so can hardly be classed as independent. The same page was used as the single reference for Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin, which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Gaois (talk) 03:14, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mary O'Callaghan

The article Mary O'Callaghan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO like the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan, with others opting to unanimously delete those. Sports officials are not covered by WP:NGAELIC. One of the sources provided is one page (460) in a book. This same page was used as the single reference for Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin and Lil O'Grady, which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant. This book was written by another president of the same organisation so can hardly be classed as independent. There is a link to the Camogie Association website, which is not independent either. Details such as being a vice-chair and a second-tier competition being established "near the end of her presidency" and how this competition was organised do not contribute to notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Gaois (talk) 03:14, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Síghle Nic an Ultaigh

The article Síghle Nic an Ultaigh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO like the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan, with others opting to unanimously delete those. Sports officials are not covered by WP:NGAELIC. Details such as being named after a folkloric figure and organising courses for referees do not contribute to notability. There is a link to the Down GAA website, which is not independent. The article even states that the subject "remained closely associated with Down GAA throughout her life". Another of the sources provided is one page (460) in a book. This same page was used as the single reference for Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin and Lil O'Grady, which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant. This book was written by another president of the same organisation so can hardly be classed as independent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Gaois (talk) 23:05, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Belle O'Loughlin

The article Belle O'Loughlin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO like the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan, with others opting to unanimously delete those. Sports officials are not covered by WP:NGAELIC. The single source provided is one page (460) in a book. This same page was used as the single reference for Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin and Lil O'Grady, which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant. This book was written by another president of the same organisation so can hardly be classed as independent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Gaois (talk) 23:05, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Agnes Hennessy

The article Agnes Hennessy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO like the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan, with others opting to unanimously delete those. Sports officials are not covered by WP:NGAELIC. Nor is the unfortunate death of her husband, his resting place and the activities of her children. She seems to have vanished without trace one year after her presidency. One of the sources provided is one page (460) in a book. This same page was used as the single reference for Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin and Lil O'Grady, which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant. This book was written by another president of the same organisation so can hardly be classed as independent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

--Gaois (talk) 22:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lily Spence

The article Lily Spence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO like the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan, with others opting to unanimously delete those. Sports officials are not covered by WP:NGAELIC. Nor is organising coaching courses, being a treasurer, chair of a colleges council and involvement with two others on an adjudication panel. One of the sources provided is one page (460) in a book. This same page was used as the single reference for Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin and Lil O'Grady, which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant. This book was written by another president of the same organisation so can hardly be classed as independent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

--Gaois (talk) 22:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peter Lucey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Lucey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Lucey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 12:59, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nell McCarthy

The article Nell McCarthy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO like the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan, with others opting to unanimously delete those. Sports officials are not covered by WP:NGAELIC. Nor is a club playing career, the introduction of skirts or the publication of four issues of a magazine by... someone else... who has no page anyway. As for the uncle and grandnephew... one of the sources is the briefest of obituaries (six sentences, one given over to the uncle and grandnephew). The other source provided is one page (460) in a book. This same page was used as the single reference for Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin and Lil O'Grady, which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant. This book was written by another president of the same organisation so can hardly be classed as independent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaois (talk) 04:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Phyllis Breslin

The article Phyllis Breslin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO like the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan, with others opting to unanimously delete those. The single (seemingly independent) source provided is one page (460) in a book. This book was written by another president of the same organisation so can hardly be classed as independent. The same page was used for Agnes Hennessy, Lily Spence, Chris O'Connell, Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin, Lil O'Grady, Síghle Nic an Ultaigh, Belle O'Loughlin, and probably others, which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant. There is a link to the Camogie Association website, which is not independent either. Details such as working for the Irish Dairy Board for 32 years, being the fourth of seven children and the various adventures of her grandfather, an uncle and father do not contribute to notability. Sadly she seems to have died but the only obituary of her (in a local paper) gives little else to add save for "she loved to attend novenas to Saint Anthony and devotions to Our Lady. Her many other hobbies included playing bridge, crafts, going out for lunch, cooking and baking... loved to bake scones, apple tarts, sponges and queen cakes... She was never a real drinker but would very occasionally indulge herself with a Pimms and red lemonade." Though since "Phyllis never missed her weekly copy of the Waterford News & Star and it is only fitting that she be remembered here" it is possibly not independent either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaois (talk) 04:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emer O'Farrell

The article Emer O'Farrell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. A Google search for her name does not produce much that relates to anyone from Galway. A Google search for her name and her name with Athenry also returned only 6 pages of results. No sportspeople with a connection to Galway or to Limerick showed up. This is a WP:MIRROR. This and this will not help to add anything. This does not appear to be the same person. This does not appear to be her either. Being a nominee for a club award is not notable by itself. Being a member of a team that won a second-tier cup in this context is rarely (if ever?) notable. Being a leading scorer for her club in such sports is rarely (if ever?) notable. A club/college/minor player of such sports is rarely (if ever?) notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amy Murphy

The article Amy Murphy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The website link used as reference for her "club record" is dead and, even if it was not, it is still not independent of the subject. A Google search for her name returned only 162 results. This is probably not her. This is probably not her either. The actress might be a more likely target for this title but it appears that she has only two credits, from 1999 and 2000. A club/under-16/under-14 player in such sports is rarely (if ever) notable. This Amy Murphy plays the sport with Sliabh Rua, which is presumably only a club too. I am not sure what it could be used for except to say she dislikes "missing training". But she would have been about seven when User:Camogie History created this article in January 2010, so it isn't her.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aisling Diamond

The article Aisling Diamond has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. A Google search for this name returned only 97 results. The official website link cited is dead and is not independent of the subject. As for the other citation, if she was playing minor in 2004 then if a local paper from 2000 mentions her as "an under-14 star for Blackhall in the community games", would that not mean she had recently left primary school? Yet that link is also dead. It is difficult so see what it would add even if was not. This might be her, finishing as "second runner-up" in Miss Meath 2011. But finishing as second runner-up in Miss Meath 2011 is unlikely to lead to notability. This actress has one credit from 2021. She might have a future chance of taking this title. A club/under-16/under-14 player in such sports is rarely (if ever) notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bernie Farrelly

The article Bernie Farrelly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. A Google search for this name, if anything, returned more results for the Australian rules football player. Even that search returned only 133 results. The search showed nothing that could be used to improve the article. The name is not mentioned in coverage of the subject, e.g. here. A Google search for "Bernie Maguire" returned only 213 results. A Google search for "Bernadette Maguire" returned only 160 results. A club player in such sports is rarely (if ever) notable. The subject of this article does not seem to have played for Waterford yet. The only source provided is one page (460) in a book. This book was written by a president of the organisation overseeing this sport, and was published by that organisation, so can hardly be classed as independent. The same page was used as the single reference for Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin, as well as several other stubs that have been deleted in recent years, created by User:Camogie History. This suggests more of a list on that page rather than anything that amounts to significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Louise Donoghue

The article Louise Donoghue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The only source is the official website of the organisation the person is supposed to be involved with. It does not work. A player having "minor, Under 14 and Under 16 trophies" is rarely (if ever?) notable in any sport. A Google search for her name and Galway returned only 132 results. There is often no mention of sport. If there is they are briefly mentioned playing the wrong sport or for the wrong team. This is a WP:MIRROR. Even if she is this SNA (special needs assistant, working in the classroom of a primary school), that is not sufficient to establish notability. This looks promising as it refers to Galway. But it is a passing mention, the last in a group of people: "the half-back line of Áine Keogh, Cheyenne O'Brien and Louise Donoghue proved effective defensively". She is playing for the wrong team anyway. And half-back is definitely not her right corner-forward position. There is this passing mention. But it is football (junior at that) and in a different province. Even if it was her (if she moved to a different part of the country), a club player in such sports is rarely (if ever?) notable. Regardless of how many junior club titles they win.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaois (talk) 23:32, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miriam Malone

The article Miriam Malone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The first link provided as a reference does not appear to work. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. The second citation is from a local newspaper but it is impossible to tell what this contains. The first external link provided is to the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. It is unclear why User:Camogie History left it there but it is a regular occurrence in articles that they created. A Wikipedia List of players leads not to a list but to a Wikipedia category for players. In what sense is that link "external"? WP:EL states in its opening sentence that they are "links to web pages outside Wikipedia". Captaining a club in a junior final is rarely (if ever?) notable. Being a club's player of the year is rarely (if ever?) notable. Being a "substitute who didn't play" is rarely (if ever?) notable. An under-16/under-14 player in such sports is rarely (if ever?) notable. The subject of this article does not seem to have played the sport at a high enough level for inclusion. A Google search for her name returned only 180 results. This is sport but the Malone mentioned played field hockey and is not "Miriam". A search for "Miriam Malone Waterford camogie" returned only links to other people with this name. There is a shortage of detailed reliable secondary sources that can be used to improve this article. The "Miriam" here is actually called Miriam Walsh and turns out to be playing for Kilkenny against Waterford. She is here again, with a Miriam Bambrick and a Julianne Malone, also playing for Kilkenny, but against Limerick. Those are both from the websites of the organisation she is supposed to be involved with. Even if they amounted to anything they still do not prove this is a notable person.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaois (talk) 23:32, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Teresa Murphy

The article Teresa Murphy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. There is the customary User:Camogie History link to the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. It is almost as if the article was created to link to the official website. A Google search for her name returned only 126 results. This is a solicitor. There is no indication that it is the same person. This is a visual artist. There is no indication that it is the same person. This is an actress and assistant director. This is a writer and filmmaker. This is a "Deputy Provost for Academic Affairs" and Professor of American Studies. This is her again. This does not appear to be the same person. Even if this is her I do not know how it could be used to improve the article. This is unlikely to be her. This is a teacher but she is in the wrong country. This is the correct country. But it does not mention sport. Even if it did she was from a different part of the country. This is from a different part of the country too. This is also from a different part of the country. This is from a different country entirely. This is from another different country. At least this is sport. But it is the wrong sport. This is from the correct part of the right country. But it does not mention sport. A club player in such sports is rarely (if ever?) notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaois (talk) 15:59, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 15:59, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 15:59, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marianne Johnson

The article Marianne Johnson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The first link provided as a reference does not appear to work. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. The second citation is from a local newspaper but it is impossible to tell what this contains. There is the customary User:Camogie History link to the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. A Wikipedia List of players leads not to a list but to a Wikipedia category for players. In what sense is that link "external"? WP:EL states in its opening sentence that they are "links to web pages outside Wikipedia". A Google search for her name returned only 112 results. Those concern a mathematics lecturer, an economics professor, an actress, a business executive. Nothing in particular on this sport (or even on sport in general). A Google search for "Marianne Johnson Waterford" returned only 126 results. Many of them are the same as those included above. In case of misspelling, a search for "Marian Johnson" returned only 105 results. Many of them are the same as those included above. A search for "Marian Johnson Waterford" returned only 136 results. Many of them are the same as those included above. A club player in such sports is rarely (if ever?) notable. An assistant secretary in such sports is rarely (if ever?) notable. An under-14 player is rarely (if ever?) notable in any sport. An under-16 player is rarely (if ever?) notable in any sport.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaois (talk) 15:59, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vivienne Kelly

The article Vivienne Kelly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Her talk page contains a note from nearly 10 years ago recommending that she should be deleted so this is long overdue. The only link provided as a reference does not appear to work. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. There is the customary User:Camogie History link directly to the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. It is almost as if the article was created to link to the official website. A Wikipedia List of players leads not to a list but to a Wikipedia category for players. In what sense is that link "external"? WP:EL states in its opening sentence that they are "links to web pages outside Wikipedia". A Google search for her name returned only 110 results. There was nothing in particular concerning this sport. There was nothing in particular concerning any sport. A club player in such sports is rarely (if ever?) notable. The results lead to various other people who might as well be the target of this article title. But the scarcity of those results means that this is unlikely. There are various different businesspeople. There is Radio Today's former Editor and Content Director and her shock at being made redundant. She has some slight coverage in a desperately poor field of candidates. But it does not look like it is enough. This is the closest mention of her occupation. She is the second of four names in the sentence that is the sixth paragraph. She has a nice smile but it does not help to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaois (talk) 15:59, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anne Griffin

The article Anne Griffin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The article has been tagged for several years as needing additional citations for verification. The reference provided does not appear to work. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. The only other links are to the official websites of the same organisation, as is customary with articles created by User:Camogie History. It is almost as if the article was created to link to the official website. It also has the effect of causing the more clearly notable writer to be at a different title (is it because she came along later?) A college player in such sports is rarely (if ever?) notable. Less so if it is playing for the college described in the competition described. A club player in such sports is rarely (if ever?) notable. Having medals at this level is rarely (if ever?) notable, regardless if they are winner or runner-up. Playing for an under-14 team is rarely (if ever?) notable in any sport. Since she appears to have retired there is not much that can be added. A Google search for her name and team returned only 98 results. A Google search for the alternative spelling of her name returned only 124 results. There are players for numerous other clubs, including with similar names, but no player of this name playing for this team. This is probably not her. This is probably not her either. Most of the results have nothing to do with sport. If you go through this her name is included. But it does not appear to be her. There is nothing that can be used to improve an article about this player for this team. And the writer probably deserves to go directly to this title.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 16:20, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fiona Stephens

The article Fiona Stephens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The reference provided does not appear to work. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. There are the customary User:Camogie History link to the official website(s) of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. It is almost as if the article was created to link to the official website. There are links to various match reports which do not appear to work and videos which are not "available any more". A club player in such sports is rarely (if ever?) notable. A college player winning a medal with that institution is rarely (if ever?) notable. A player being a "Freshers player of the year" is rarely (if ever?) notable. Receiving scholarships probably does not count as notable. It is uncited anyway. A Google search for her name returned only 90 results. This is nearly the same name. This is probably not her. This is probably not her either. The Fiona and the Stephens here are two different people. This is a curator. This is the wrong country. This is probably not her. This is probably not her either. If this is her then it is "independently published" but it is written by her. Many results involving sport (at least those that are independent and possibly reliable, e.g. here) are brief local mentions of people playing for other teams in other sports. This is sport. But it is the wrong sport, in the wrong country. This is an example of the wrong Fiona and the wrong sport but the right country (though wrong part of it). This is also sport and she has the right name. But it is unlikely to be her.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 16:20, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rose Quigley

The article Rose Quigley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The first reference provided does not appear to work. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. The second reference provided does not mention this person. It only mentions a person with the same surname. The only other link is to the official websites of the same organisation, as is customary with articles created by User:Camogie History. It is almost as if the article was created to link to the official website. A Wikipedia List of players leads not to a list but to a Wikipedia category for players. In what sense is that link "external"? WP:EL states in its opening sentence that they are "links to web pages outside Wikipedia". A Google search for her name returned only 163 results. The person named "Rebecca Rose Quigley" who features in so many of the results does not appear to be her. She is from Clones if anyone is interested. This is a person named "Sarah Rose Quigley". This is a actress named "Gabriella Rose Quigley". This is an actress named "Emmerson Rose Quigley". This is a person named "Kenzie Rose Quigley". At this point the results become about two Roses of Tralee who must be showing because their surname is Quigley. There is even wine, which might be necessary after this search. This is all I have found for "Rose Quigley". A search for her name and team returned only 68 results. This mentions a "Ray Quigley". Is it the one from the second reference? This mentions a Stephen Quigley. At least Stephen is playing, and even scoring. And in a league final in the right county. But he is doing so for the opposition team. This person might not even exist. There is no evidence for it. Not even a late substitute appearance in a junior B final.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 16:20, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 16:20, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Theresa Cairns

The article Theresa Cairns has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The first reference provided does not appear to work. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. The second reference does not appear to work either. There is the customary User:Camogie History link to the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. It is almost as if the article was created to link to the official website. A Wikipedia List of players leads not to a list but to a Wikipedia category for players. In what sense is that link "external"? WP:EL states in its opening sentence that they are "links to web pages outside Wikipedia". The article has been tagged as "confusing or unclear to readers" for nearly a decade and a half, with part of the problem being uncertainty over her exact name. A clarification request on her talk page has not been answered for all that time. A Google search for her name returned only 191 results. This is an artist. This is a fundraiser. This is probably not her. This is an educator. The Theresa and the Cairns in this are separate people. This is the same sad case. This is "a researcher, consultant and trainer, film maker and life/oral historian". But it is in the wrong country. This is also in the wrong country and does not mention sport. This might have been her if it was not the wrong country. This is another wrong country. As is this. At least this is sport. But the wrong one. A club player in such sports is rarely (if ever?) notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 22:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 22:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Audrey Kennedy

The article Audrey Kennedy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. It is unclear how having a non-notable brother who won only minor and junior titles contributes towards notability. That is uncited anyway. It is unclear how (apparently) having a well-known 'Award Winning' husband contributes towards notability. That is also uncited. And appears to link to someone with a different nationality than the one described in this article. The first reference provided does not appear to work. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. The second reference does not appear to work either. There are the customary User:Camogie History link to the official website(s) of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. It is almost as if the article was created to link to the official website. There are links to various match reports which do not appear to work and videos which are not "available any more". A Google search for her name returned only 118 results. A search for her name with Limerick much the same. This is an actress. This is her again. This is a chef. This is a former dating advice columnist and amateur film photographer. This is a solicitor who merged her "long established firm" with the one run by Maureen Black. This is a brief mention at the end of the fourth paragraph. At least it is the same sport. But it is the wrong team. And in the wrong part of the country. And the wrong position (a forward saving a shot?). It is too short anyway. This is unlikely to be her. This is the wrong country. This is also the wrong country. A club player in such sports is rarely (if ever?) notable. A player being named on their club's team of the year is rarely (if ever?) notable. Having a medal from school probably does not count as notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 22:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karen Brady

The article Karen Brady has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The first reference provided does not appear to work. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. The second reference is vague. There are the customary User:Camogie History link(s) to the official website(s) of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. It is almost as if the article was created to link to the official website. There are links to various match reports which do not appear to work and videos which are not "available anymore". The "On The Ball Official" link leads to RTÉ.ie, a list of years when a camogie competition was won? A Google search for her name and county returned only 111 results. This is about fitness. But it does not appear to be her. Neither of the two women referred to here appear to be her. This is nearly the same name. This from The Irish Times mentions a "secretary to the Irish Council of Churches" who spoke at a conference. The "Karen Brady" in the other result from The Irish Times turns out to be the similarly named "Karren Brady" who "replaced" a different woman in a boardroom. She does lots of different things but did not mention camogie when she met Queen Elizabeth. This is an office assistant. But it does not mention sport. This is a wedding co-ordinator. It does not mention sport either. This incident/injury report involves a "Karen Brady". But what exactly happened is not clear. This is a history teacher from Navan. It is probably not her. This is a wife. This mentions her again. But at least it is sport and nearer than Navan. The "Karen Brady" mentioned here is a softball coach. There are a couple of people with a similar name listed here but they are playing for the wrong team. The "Brady" here is even playing the wrong sport for the wrong team. The "Karen" and the "Brady" here are separate people even though they are in the correct location. The "Karen Brady" writing here is in the correct location but it is not clear how this helps to establish notability. A Google search for her name and town returned only 62 results. At least this is about a person named "Brady". His name (Richard) even has "ar" in it, like "Karen".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 14:05, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maura McNicholas

The article Maura McNicholas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The reference provided does not appear to work. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. There are the customary User:Camogie History link(s) to the official website(s) of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. It is almost as if the article was created to link to the official website. A Wikipedia List of players leads not to a list but to a Wikipedia category for players. In what sense is that link "external"? WP:EL states in its opening sentence that they are "links to web pages outside Wikipedia". A Google search for her name returned only 72 results. Maura wrote this. McNicholas is one of three women she is thanking for helping her not to land at the wrong airport. This has sport. But it is golf. Many of the newspaper reports and other search results relate to golf. This is presumably the same person. This too. Even if they are her they just mention the name. This might be her as well. At least it gives some details about who the person is. Still no camogie. And it is really about Mary McCabe from Abbeyleix. There is more golf in this press release. This is someone who is involved in a public library. This must be the same person. The "Maura" and the "McNicholas" here are separate people. The "Maura" and the "McNicholas" here are also separate people. This is from the wrong part of the country. This is presumably her again, still in the same wrong part of the country. "Maura" won €25 here. But the "McNicholas" turns out to be two boys in a photograph. They are enjoying themselves on a Christmas morning. It is the same wrong part of the country as the previous person. Therefore the two boys might be related to the woman? At least this is sport. But it is the wrong sport. And "Maura" and "McNicholas" again refer to separate people. And this is much the same. But with positions swapped about. "Maura" has risen from eighth to third position. "McNicholas" has dropped from first to second position. The first is for "Offensive Leaders" and the second is for "Scoring Leaders". One of the athletes listed here has the correct name. But it is the wrong sport. It does not seem like she won a medal. A club player in such sports is rarely (if ever?) notable. Having a medal from school probably does not count as notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 13:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eimer Moynihan

The article Eimer Moynihan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. This has been tagged as needing improvements for nearly five years. The only reference provided does not appear to work. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with, as is typical of articles created by User:Camogie History. It is almost as if the article was created to link to the official website. A Google search for her name returned only 94 results. This is sport. But it is the wrong sport and in the wrong part of the country. This is also the wrong sport. The woman in this photograph is attending "the Soroptimist International Girl's Public Speaking Competition". She is in the wrong part of the country. Here she is again in another photograph, "practicing her flipping" for a coffee morning. This is the sister of a dead man. She is in the same wrong part of the country. Based on the location of the second photograph she might even be the same person. But possibly not. The hotel has a different name. The names in this list are separate people. The names here are separate people. As are the names here. But the woman with the surname has a similar first name if looked at closely. The women included here are also separate people. At least this is sport. But it is the wrong sport. And they are two separate people. This is another wrong sport and they are different people. This minor club final report mentions a player with a similar name. But it is football so it is the wrong sport. This is camogie and there are players with similar names. But is appears to be a competition for schools. The people with similar names here are playing camogie. But they are playing for separate teams. It is an under-14 competition anyway. The people with similar names here are also separate people. It is also the wrong sport. But at least it is not an under-14 competition.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 14:47, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 14:47, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 14:47, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Josephine McClellan

The article Josephine McClellan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The only reference provided is one page (460) in a book. The book was written by a president of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with so can hardly be classed as independent. The same page was used for Agnes Hennessy, Lily Spence, Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin, Lil O'Grady, Síghle Nic an Ultaigh, Belle O'Loughlin, and so many others, which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant. It is familiar sign of User:Camogie History's involvement and, yet again, it turns out they are the creator of the page. A Google search for her name returned only 149 results. These are separate people. This is a producer. This is a song. This is it again. This is an artist. I do not know how this can be used to establish notability. I do not know how this can be used to establish notability either. This is a blog. This is a researcher. But she is based in the wrong country. At least this is sport. But it is the wrong sport and they are separate people. It is the wrong country anyway. This is just a list of people from the wrong country. An intermediate club player in such sports is rarely (if ever?) notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 14:47, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 14:47, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 14:47, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Louise Molony

The article Louise Molony has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. It is unclear how the activities of her sisters and her cousins contribute towards notability. That is uncited anyway. It is unclear how her position within her family contributes towards notability. That is also uncited. The first source provided is one page (460) in a book. This book was written by a president of the organisation which runs the sport this person is supposed to be involved in so it is not particularly independent. The same page was used for Agnes Hennessy, Lily Spence, Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin, Lil O'Grady, Síghle Nic an Ultaigh, Belle O'Loughlin, and countless others, which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant. It is also a sign, yet again, that User:Camogie History has been here and, sure enough, it is this editor who created the article. It is almost as if the article was created to promote this book. It is everywhere. And always the same page (460). The second reference provided is a "Camogie roundup" that does not appear to work. The third reference provided does not work either. Even if it did it is from the website of a club this person has been involved with so can hardly be classed as independent. A Google search for her name returned only 147 results. Most of those are about a radio producer. This is about the beauty industry. This person nearly has the same name. But there is no information about her there. And none here either. This person works in London so is in the wrong country. This person is also in the wrong country. As is this person, who lives in Melbourne. It looks like this is her again. This woman's son is an actor. This person is one of a couple who are determined to "embark on a journey through the 1990s and attempt (with your help) to document every iconic thing about it in alphabetical order". The people here appear to be separate. The people on this "Board of Management" are separate. The people here who are "Guiding Ireland towards excellence in gluten-free living, fostering a healthier & more inclusive environment for all" are separate.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 14:47, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 14:47, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brigid Coyle

The article Brigid Coyle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. This article has been tagged as needing improvements for more than five years. The improvements requested include lack of citations to reliable sources/problems with verification. To focus on what is here: it is unclear how the activities of various family members contribute towards notability. Those claims are uncited anyway. The first reference provided does not appear to work as is typical with the work of this article's creator. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. The second reference appears to be about a completely different person. The name does not appear to be mentioned at all, in any part of it. But, even if it is a family member with the same surname, it is not clear how a passing mention in a report on a relative's death can contribute towards notability. A Google search for her name returned only 129 results. This is a teacher. In the wrong country. This is just a photograph of a school concert, third row. This secretary lives in the wrong country. This secretary is also from the wrong country. This woman raised a "large, young family". This person works with couples. It does not mention sport. She seems to be based in the wrong part of the country anyway. This is "one of two hundred and ten medical practitioners delivering medical care within the area of Wicklow county". At least this is sport. But it is the wrong one and it is in the wrong part of the country. This person has the same name. But it could be anyone. This girl died when she was 12 so it is unlikely to be her. This is a different burial but it is unclear what age she was. This person was 83 in 1951. It is unlikely to have been her. This is about a field in Castlerahan.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 17:07, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karen Tinelly

The article Karen Tinelly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Other editors have tagged this as having multiple issues. The only reference provided does not appear to work.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 23:31, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 23:31, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 23:31, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michaela Connolly

The article Michaela Connolly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The only reference provided is one page (460) in a book. The book was written by a president of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with, so it cannot particularly be classed as independent. The same page was used for Agnes Hennessy, Lily Spence, Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin, Lil O'Grady, Síghle Nic an Ultaigh, Belle O'Loughlin, and so many others, which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant. There is a link to the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. It is almost as if the article was created to link to the official website. A Google search for her name returned only 68 results.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 13:50, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 13:50, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alison McGuigan

The article Alison McGuigan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The only reference provided does not appear to work. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. There are links to various official websites of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. It is almost as if the article was created to link to the official websites. It is full of uncited claims. The competition she is supposed to have won a medal in is for boys and girls and does not even give a definite year. What happened "around 2000" was a quarter of a century ago so "now" could mean anything but probably 2010 when User:Camogie History created the article. A Google search for her name returned only 67 results.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 18:20, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jean Nolan

The article Jean Nolan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The first reference provided does not appear to work. Even if it did it appears to be a match report in a local newspaper. The second reference provided does not appear to work. Even if it did it appears also to be a match report in a local newspaper. There is a link to the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. It is almost as if the article was created to link to the official website. It is full of uncited claims such as having been a "joint seventh scorer" and the time she is supposed to have scored four goals in one match. A Google search for her name returned only 114 results.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 18:20, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marian Kearns

The article Marian Kearns has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The only reference provided does not appear to work. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. There is the customary User:Camogie History link to the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. It is almost as if the article was created to link to the official website. A Wikipedia List of players leads not to a list but to a Wikipedia category for players. In what sense is that link "external"? WP:EL states in its opening sentence that they are "links to web pages outside Wikipedia". A Google search for her name returned only 93 results.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 18:00, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Regina Garman

The article Regina Garman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The first reference provided does not appear to work. Even if it did it appears to be a match report in a newspaper that refers to her cousin. The second reference provided does not appear to work either. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. It is unclear how the activities of various family members contribute towards notability. Those claims are not adequately cited anyway. The "underage shinty skills showcase" does not have a definite year. The junior/minor/under-14/under-16/primary school/secondary school competitions do not establish notability and are also not cited. The "interview conducted for the Camogie Association" would not be independent of that organisation even if it could be found. A Google search for her name returned only 209 results.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 18:00, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patricia Gibbons

The article Patricia Gibbons has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The only reference provided does not appear to work. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. The name of the club (unless it is "Club") has not been provided. How this person "helps with the club" is not clear. Obviously since retiring this person would be a former player. There are links to the official websites of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. It is almost as if the article was created to link to the official websites. A Google search for her name returned only 94 results.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 18:00, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marian Kearns

The article Marian Kearns has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The only reference provided does not appear to work. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. There is the customary User:Camogie History link to the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. It is almost as if the article was created to link to the official website. A Wikipedia List of players leads not to a list but to a Wikipedia category for players. In what sense is that link "external"? WP:EL states in its opening sentence that they are "links to web pages outside Wikipedia". A Google search for her name returned only 93 results.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 18:00, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Catriona Bower

The article Catriona Bower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The only reference provided does not appear to work. Even if it did it is from the official website of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. There are links to the official websites of the organisation this person is supposed to be involved with. It is almost as if the article was created to link to the official websites. There are links to videos which are not "available any more". The "On The Ball Official" link leads to a different website, a list of years when a competition was won? A Google search for her name returned only 147 results.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 18:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mary Lynch

The article Mary Lynch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO like the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan, with others opting to unanimously delete those. Sports officials are not covered by WP:NGAELIC. Nor is a secondary school playing and club playing career, being a chair in and "reorganising" sport in either a town in Monaghan or the entire county of Monaghan, training various teams, continuing "to play the game at a low enough level", featuring on a primary schools committee, chairing a fixtures committee, getting married, having an unspecified role(s?) with Care of the Aged, having an unspecified role(s?) with Girl Guides, having unspecified roles with "youth and recreational organisations", and having unspecified roles with "social services". One of the sources provided focuses on the "severe financial problems" facing the association she is involved with, rather than on the subject of this biography. The other source provided is one page (460) in a book. This same page was used as the single reference for Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin, Lil O'Grady, as well as numerous other biographies which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant. This book was written by another president of the same organisation so can hardly be classed as independent. A Google search only shows more links to her organisation's websites or independent links referring to players with similar names (e.g. "Molly"). This briefly mentions a player with another similar name but it is the wrong sport.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 18:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rosina McManus

The article Rosina McManus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO like the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan, with others opting to unanimously delete those. Sports officials are not covered by WP:NGAELIC. Nor is refereeing matches and "organising coaching courses" (even if they "were filmed for promotional purposes"). Not even her public (and rather dramatic) collapse 48 hours before her death appears to have attracted much notice. The only independent source deals with the event in three short sentences and describes her, first, as only "one of the most respected officials", and, then, as someone who had "many roles down the years". Wikipedia has more specific information about her life than the report of her death (though it is not clear how much of it is accurate). The second source reporting her death is a blog. The other source provided is one page (460) in a book. This same page was used as the single reference for Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin, Lil O'Grady, as well as numerous other biographies which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant. This book was written by another president of the same organisation so can hardly be classed as independent. A Google search only shows more links to her organisation's websites. This newspaper link on her death is even vaguer. It just states "She was one in a million. She will be sadly missed. xxx." Without the date it would be impossible to tell if they were the same person.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 18:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pat Rafferty

The article Pat Rafferty has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO like the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan, with others opting to unanimously delete those. Sports officials are not covered by WP:NGAELIC. Nor is a club playing career, working as "a librarian" in the National Institute of Research and Standards, being "a candidate for secretary". None of it is cited anyway. The last source provided is from the organisation she is involved with so can hardly be classed as independent. It does not appear to be working anyway. Actually none of the sources provided appear to be working. One of the possibly independent sources mentions improved attendances for the organisation rather than anything related to the subject of this biography. The first source provided is one page (460) in a book. This same page was used as the single reference for Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin, Lil O'Grady, as well as numerous other biographies which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant. This book was written by another president of the same organisation so can hardly be classed as independent either. A Google search only shows more links to the organisation's websites. Independent links either briefly mention someone with this name who might be the subject of this biography (such as this) or refer to presumably different people entirely (such as this and this).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 18:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eibhlín Lawlor

The article Eibhlín Lawlor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO like the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan, with others opting to unanimously delete those. Sports officials are not covered by WP:NGAELIC. There are parts that are both promotional and vague ("is from a particularly strong camogie background, which suits her role as Association leader"), repetitive and outdated ("Leinster League Coordinator, coordinating a league which has grown from 19 teams in its first year, 2007, to 36 teams in 2010"), while it is not clear why one of her sons is named but the other two are not. Most of the sources, including the interview and "information for all the presidential candidates", lead to the official website. There are two match reports. One mentions her initial. None of the links appear to work. The only other source provided is one page (460) in a book. This same page was used as the single reference for Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin, Lil O'Grady, as well as numerous other biographies which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant. This book was written by another president of the same organisation so can hardly be classed as independent. The only inclusion of a person with this name in the Irish Examiner newspaper does not even relate to sport.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 14:07, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joan O'Flynn

The article Joan O'Flynn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO like the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan, with others opting to unanimously delete those. Sports officials are not covered by WP:NGAELIC. None of the sources provided are working. The first reference is one page (460) in a book. This same page was used as the single reference for Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin, Lil O'Grady, as well as numerous other biographies which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant. This book was written by another president of the same organisation so can hardly be classed as independent. The second reference appears to refer to the author of that book in its title so is not even related to this biography. The third reference leads to a missing page on the official website. The fourth reference refers to an 'experienced pair' so does not seem to have even been about one person. The sixth reference leads to non-existent 'reports and interviews' and the part of the biography where it is included refers to a "strategic review" on attendances, membership and numbers of clubs that happened during a different presidency and proably have nothing to do with the subject of this biography. The seventh reference appears to have been about a new constitution and official rules. The eighth reference appears to have been about teams receiving "greater access". The ninth reference appears to have been a media campaign which had little or nothing to do with the subject of this biography. The tenth reference appears to have been an opinion column. More rules (e.g. "two points for a sideline cut") in references eleven and twelve. The last reference covers the claim of time spent as "Policy and Information Worker for a charity working with vulnerable young Irish emigrants, worked for Combat Poverty Agency (1994–2009) as Head of Communications". But is that enough to establish notability? The link at the end also does not work. Even if it did it is not clear what relevance it has to the subject of this biography. The only inclusion of a person with this name in The Irish Times newspaper is an appearance on one episode of a show about hurling that mentions her between two other contributors to the same episode ("just the Camogie Association's Joan O'Flynn", so not even a presidency).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 14:07, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miriam O'Callaghan (camogie)

The article Miriam O'Callaghan (camogie) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO like the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan, with others opting to unanimously delete those. Sports officials are not covered by WP:NGAELIC. The first reference provided is one page (460) in a book. This same page was used as the single reference for Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin, Lil O'Grady, as well as numerous other biographies which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant. This book was written by another president of the same organisation so can hardly be classed as independent. The second reference takes some effort to find any mention of the subject of this biography. It is under school hurling, Division 2 adult hurling, Under-21 Gaelic football, and several others sports like hockey and tennis. Then it just notes the result. The third reference is to a publicity campaign which "preceded the presidency" so is not even related to it. The fourth reference mentions her between "GAA president Seán Kelly yesterday launched the integration document which followed a pilot scheme in eight counties" and "Ladies football association president Geraldine Giles also backed the report". The fifth reference just gives a short comment at the end: Miriam O'Callaghan, president of the Camogie Association, said: "Gaelic games followers will now be better served with this natural fit of All-Ireland finals." This was carried out with the assistance of another chairman, so it does not establish much of a claim for individual notability. The sixth reference just mentions the unveiling of a plaque: "a beautiful plaque was unveiled by Uachtaráin Miriam O'Callaghan on Saturday". The seventh reference just states: "President of Cumann CamógaÍochta na nGael Miriam O'Callaghan reacted very favourably to the news". The eighth reference is an opinion piece about a separate board appointment which is unrelated to this presidency. The ninth reference involves a local "multi-sectoral subcommittee".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 14:07, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lucy Cullen-Byrne

The article Lucy Cullen-Byrne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO like the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan, with others opting to unanimously delete those. Sports officials are not covered by WP:NGAELIC. Nor is having a father who is a farmer, having a home "frequently targeted and raided by British forces during the War of Independence" (uncited and a presumably routine experience at that time?), being "involved in many of the national organisations" (what exactly are they?), "an issue which may have been related to pro and anti-treaty divisions within the sport" (more vagueness), having no children, living in Wicklow and whatever else she did with her husband. Her sister married a noted Republican, but the spouse in his infobox has a different name. The only source provided is one page (460) in a book. This same page was used as the single reference for Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin, Lil O'Grady, as well as numerous other biographies which suggests more of a list on that page than anything more significant. This book was written by another president of the same organisation so can hardly be classed as independent. The article was tagged for improvements five years ago next month.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Gaois (talk) 14:07, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]