User talk:Boredintheevening
ITN recognition for Fredric Jameson
[edit]On 29 September 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Fredric Jameson, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 17:50, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Lauren Berlant
[edit]On 1 July 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Lauren Berlant, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 01:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
ITN recognition for David Graeber
[edit]On 5 September 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article David Graeber, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 23:59, 5 September 2020 (UTC
Anarchism
[edit]
Hi Boredintheevening,
I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, participate in edit drives, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!
We also have a mailing list if you'd like to be notified of upcoming edit drives.
Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 11:54, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Czar, nice to hear from you! Thank you for all the work you've put into the topic. I've just added myself into the mailing list and added the noticeboard to my list. About to reply to you about the Reclus page. Happy editing. Boredintheevening (talk) 14:47, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Editor experience invitation
[edit]Hi Boredintheevening. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermossđ (talk) 03:33, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Clovermoss! Happy new year and lovely to hear from you about your project. I'd love to take part and I'll write something up this week. Thank you for reaching out about it :) Boredintheevening (talk) 15:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Feel free to reach out to me anytime about your own research :) Clovermossđ (talk) 02:13, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
State Violence
[edit]Hi, looks like you're also looking to work on the article for state violence. I initiated the AFD because of the state of it, but just making it a better article sounds like a more workable solution. I just cut out a bunch of the fluff, and think it has to be rebuilt from the ground up, informing the about the term and its application, rather than trying to impress on the reader that (American) State Violence is Bad. I'm thinking first a section on the history of the terms, then various aspects of state violence (surveillance, repression, whatever), broken up by examples of how they function in different countries. Let me know your thoughts.
Bruhpedia (talk) 18:31, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hi! Yes, I think it will definitely benefit from a comprehensive rewrite that's grounded in NPOV and reliable sources summarising key ideas. And I do want to move it away from its geographic focus on the United States. There's definitely been plenty of relevant discussion about the topic by thinkers in philosophy and the social sciences, and I think we'll have more than enough to work from. I'll keep an eye on the page on my watchlist and start addressing it shortly.
- I think, unfortunately, it may have reached its previous state because of the enthusiastic contributions of people less familiar with the kind of content that's appropriate for wiki.
- Thank you for putting in the work to get this going! Boredintheevening (talk) 18:55, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Cera Palin (December 2)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Cera Palin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Boredintheevening!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BenTanXiaoMing (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
|
Proposal for Correction: Silent Disco Origins
[edit]Many current articlesâincluding Wikipediaârepeat multiple historical inaccuracies about the origins of the Silent Disco. Common errors include: Crediting 1960s science fiction (e.g., Astro Boy, obscure Finnish films) as inspiration. Claiming eco-activism, wildlife protection, or FM broadcasts (e.g., Glastonbury 1994) as the origin of Silent Discos is misleading. A related misconception is Wikipediaâs claim that Silent Discos originated with eco-activists. In reality, the Pippi Autoloze Zondag(Cisco Sa) (Car-Free Sunday) events in the Netherlandsâan eco-activist initiativeâused pirate radios to broadcast music to participants. This setting became a technical testing ground where the foundational technology for the Silent Disco concept was first developed. Attributing the term âSilent Discoâ to U.S. festivals, such as Bonnaroo 2005. while the tearn silent disco already existed in the Netherelands silentdisco.com domain was bought by theh dutch in 2002, how can it be an american thing, when it already was labeled by teh dutch first? - see archive.org 2002 - 2003 - (https://web.archive.org/web/20031209083525/http://www.433fm.com/indexeng.html) These sources conflate passive listening with the participatory dance experience that defines a true Silent Disco. The concept was actually conceived by Cisco Sa in Portugal in the early 1980s and later developed in eco activist ection Pippi Autoloze Zondag and then commercialized by Dutch Nico Okkerse and Michael Minten in 2002. - see pippi autoloze zondag (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car-free_days) Many sources repeat the same incorrect claims from wikipedia about the origins of the Silent Disco, creating a feedback loop: Wikipedia scans the web, sees these repetitions, and cites them as verification, which then causes more websites to echo the same story. This cycle gives the appearance of consensus, even though the original claims are inaccurate. The topic deserves serious inspection and correction; primary-source evidence is available here silentdisco.de/silent-disco-origins-and-history (talk) 15:36, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @~2026-46793-2, thank you for bringing this to my attention. Circular referencing is definitely a big issue, and I agree that there are issues with this page around sourcing. I'll have a look into it. Boredintheevening (talk) 15:43, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
