User talk:BB Janjua

Hill Surang

Thanks for editing and helping improve the page. I am still working on adding references, maps, and formatting to make the article more accurate and suitable for approval on Wikipedia. BB Janjua (talk) 22:21, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

what i do for approval this page BB Janjua (talk) 22:39, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Dr. Abdul Rauf Janjua

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dr. Abdul Rauf Janjua, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:50, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

corrected now thanks BB Janjua (talk) 14:26, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Dr. Abdul Rauf Janjua

Hello. In case you are unaware, effective March 20, 2026, EN-WP decided to prohibit writing articles with LLM.

While on New Page Patrol this morning, I came across an article you created, Dr. Abdul Rauf Janjua, which is suspected to be AI-generated per https://www.zerogpt.com. Ergo, I added the {{ai-generated}} template to the article, and converted the article to a draft (Draft:Dr. Abdul Rauf Janjua), so that you can work on humanizing/rewording the content when you have time and inclination. In the meantime, if you have any questions, just let me know. Thanks. -- Rosiestep (talk) 16:54, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rosiestep, thank you for guiding me. I have reworded and humanized the content of the article to fix the issue. Please check it now. Thanks!" BB Janjua (talk) 18:02, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again and thanks for that. I added the {{Draft article}} template, so now there is a big blue button for you to click when you're ready to have a different volunteer review your work. (I notice that the flag icons are still there; you'll want to remove them before you click the blue button.) Good luck! --Rosiestep (talk) 20:45, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, BB Janjua!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and reach a consensus there before restoring the edit.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source. Do not use AI-generated text.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Rosiestep (talk) 16:55, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Abdul Rauf Janjua (May 28)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, EatingCarBatteries, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Dr. Abdul Rauf Janjua to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

EatingCarBatteries _{(contribs | talk)} 00:15, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Boss,

Thank you for your guidance.

I have updated and resubmitted the draft. Kindly review it and let me know if everything is in order or if any further changes are required BB Janjua (talk) 22:00, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BB Janjua! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EatingCarBatteries _{(contribs | talk)} 00:15, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Rauf Janjua (June 1)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Drew Stanley, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

COI likely

Next steps

Edit Draft:Abdul Rauf Janjua to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Drew Stanley (talk) 02:20, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, BB Janjua. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. We ask that you:

Avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors
Disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI)
Propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions
Avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming)

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation for any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

See the FAQ for article subjects for more information.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 04:58, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sarsenet. Thank you for the guidance. I want to clarify that I am not doing any paid work, nor do I have any promotional interest. I am a resident of Hill surang, and I am contributing to the article about my village purely out of personal interest and passion to document its factual history and geography.

For the Hill surang article, I am trying my best to write only the absolute truth based on verified facts, and I am searching for independent, reliable references to back up every statement. As a new editor on Wikipedia, I admit that I am still learning the policies and formatting, so I might make some mistakes, but my intentions are purely to reflect the reality of this geographical location. I would highly appreciate your guidance if I make any technical errors. Thank you for your understanding BB Janjua (talk) 05:30, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hill Surang has been accepted

Hill Surang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

nhals8 (rats in the house of the dead // in solidarity with the WWU) 15:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello BB Janjua! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Requesting review for my first draft: Hill Surang, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Rauf Janjua (June 10)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Bonadea, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for academics. The draft requires either:

evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for academics;

or multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Abdul Rauf Janjua to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

bonadea contributions talk 17:01, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello BB Janjua! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Draft Review Help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 20 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]