User talk:Annetajo

Drafts

Hello, Annetajo, I'm Bearcat. Please note that pages in draft space, such as Draft:Daria Tym are not allowed to be categorized alongside finished articles in mainspace, per WP:DRAFTNOCAT. The page must stay out of any categories so long as it is outside mainspace, and this is not an optional rule that you're free to disregard or ignore.

You can provisionally list categories in your draft without affecting content categories by using one of the methods described here.

As the page has had to be pulled out of categories twice in less than one hour, do not readd it to categories again, because draft and sandbox pages are not allowed to be in content categories. Note as well that there can be consequences for disruption if it doesn't stop, such as page protection or deletion and/or the temporary or permanent suspension of your editing privileges.

Note as well that per WP:USERNOCAT, you cannot file the sandbox version in your own userspace in categories either, as the same rules apply to sandbox content as well. Bearcat (talk) 22:38, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. I sincerely apologize for the disruption; as a new editor, I wasn't fully aware of the WP:DRAFTNOCAT rule.

I have now commented out (disabled) all the categories in the draft using . I will leave them like this until the article is reviewed and ready for the mainspace.

Thank you for guiding me in the right direction! Annetajo (talk) 23:56, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daria Tym (June 13)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Netherzone, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Daria Tym to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Netherzone (talk) 02:23, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for reviewing my draft.

Could you please point out which specific sentences or sections seem LLM‑generated to you, so I can rewrite them?

All information in the draft is based on published sources, so I do not understand why the issues of “hallucinations”, “unencyclopedic tone”, or “copyright concerns” were mentioned.

If you could indicate the exact fragments that raise concerns, I will correct them.

Thank you for your time and assistance. Annetajo (talk) 13:00, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Annetajo, Did you use AI/LLM to create the article?

There are numerous indicators and "clues" in addition to those in the AfC template above which only mentions the most common. Netherzone (talk) 15:51, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No, I did not use AI or LLM tools to create the content of the article. I wrote the draft manually based on the published sources listed in the references.

I only used AI tools for minor language corrections (grammar and clarity), not for generating any factual content.

If any specific sentences seem AI‑generated, I would appreciate it if you could point them out so I can rewrite them.

Thank you for your time. Annetajo (talk) 16:17, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Annetajo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Netherzone (talk) 02:23, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]