User talk:Anchornewsreader

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Rajiv Gandhi International Airport has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 12:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Rajiv Gandhi International Airport constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 12:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please stop making unsourced changes to the said article. Your unsourced additions also appear to be a copyright violation through the use of the word "we" as noted here: [1]. Please stop and discuss your changes on the article's talk page and/or add a source confirming what you say is correct. Please remember that Wikipedia is not a place to add speculation. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 12:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Rajiv Gandhi International Airport. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bucs2004 (talk) 06:18, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Either provide sources or stop adding them. These airlines are not likely to start servies here and they have not made any formal announcemment yet! Bucs2004 (talk) 01:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure you are. Many editors before have reverted your edits as you do not include sources with the "proposed" airlines. Bucs2004 (talk) 04:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. HkCaGu (talk) 17:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Enigma ^msg! 21:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]