User talk:Alpha Beta Delta Lambda
This user is aware of the designation of the following as contentious topics:
|
Welcome to my talk page! You might be interested look at my previous account's talk page first before posting here.
On A1 tagging
[edit]A reminder that articles shouldn't be tagged with A1 and A3 within first ten minutes of article creation, as WP:A1 and WP:A3 note. (I've seen wait times as long as an hour also being used by other patrollers.) Additionally, A7 may be a better fit for articles like Bendy vs. FNaF than A1 - the infobox provides just enough context to identify the subject as a particular YouTube video, in my view. JavaHurricane 15:24, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
August 2025
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Eze, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name does not follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 07:57, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- @SafariScribe: sorry but I think I have boldly moved with good reason as Eberechi Eze is very likely to be the primary topic under criterion 1. I might open a RM to move it (Eze) back. Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 09:27, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- @SafariScribe: hello? Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 19:06, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Alpha Beta Delta Lambda, I disagree with your assessment. Start an RM if you wish to. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 19:11, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Consensus of only two people? The so-called "consensus" is between two people who have not contributed to the page since mid-June, and also happens to be TMI (referee name and kick-off time, the latter is prone to sudden changes) and not concise. Ikhouvanjou14 (talk) 19:25, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikhouvanjou14: silent consensus existed there, seeing as you didn't provide an actual reason. Getting consensus is hard, we only have so many editors. I'm not sure if the table format is more "consise" or it is "too much information". Not to mention that it's possibly a fan POV to only include United's goals. Or the fact that most other season articles uses the new format. Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 22:24, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- Again, Premier League fixtures are prone to date or kick-off time changes. And I don't think it is needed to have the referee's names to all pages too in regards of club season articles. Ikhouvanjou14 (talk) 05:25, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, but "I don't like it" is not a good argument, even if it is phrased differently. As for KO time changes, surely you can't change the time after the game is finished? Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 08:39, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- Again, Premier League fixtures are prone to date or kick-off time changes. And I don't think it is needed to have the referee's names to all pages too in regards of club season articles. Ikhouvanjou14 (talk) 05:25, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Username?
[edit]It's a bit weird to see you using a set of Greek letters, or how about to rename to a equivalent to your old account? Also there was a feature that allows you to reset your password? Here: [1] (only use if you remember your old account's email and/or username.) ~2025-37506-58 (talk) 05:10, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Reset password doesn't work for some reason (I contacted the VRT and it still didn't work). And anyways I don't really need the only account anymore. And why not have Greek usernames? The other username wasn't great anyway.
- (also here's your reminder to register an ancount or login) Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 18:10, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Oh... (I'm too lazy to create one) ~2025-37506-58 (talk) 05:24, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
- If you're rename this account, I'm suggesting you to change to just "Cloverleaf" (or something else, that must relate to your previous account.) ~2025-37506-58 (talk) 15:12, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
Your nomination of 1998–99 Manchester United F.C. season is under review
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article 1998–99 Manchester United F.C. season is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SignedInteger -- SignedInteger (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of 1998–99 Manchester United F.C. season has passed
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article 1998–99 Manchester United F.C. season has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SignedInteger -- SignedInteger (talk) 22:27, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive
[edit]| Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive | |
| June 2026 Backlog Drive:
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?
Interested in taking part? You can sign up here. | |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive. | |
