User talk:AdonisWW2

Welcome!

Hi AdonisWW2! I noticed your contributions to Church of St George, Hampnett and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! — Rod ^talk 11:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Neapolitan Army.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Neapolitan Army.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:46, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Army of the Kingdom of Naples (Napoleonic) has been accepted

Army of the Kingdom of Naples (Napoleonic), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 talk 01:52, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including Army of the Kingdom of Naples (Napoleonic), which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:56, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

Thank you for your recent articles, including Army of the Kingdom of Naples (Napoleonic), which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:56, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi AdonisWW2! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Images in Page Previews., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of Regiments of the Army of the Kingdom of Naples (Napoleonic)

Hello, AdonisWW2,

Thank you for creating List of Regiments of the Army of the Kingdom of Naples (Napoleonic).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This is very impressive early article attempt. I'm tagging the talk page with project banners, hopefully attracting interested editors.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BusterD}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

BusterD (talk) 20:03, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Royal Corsican Regiment (Naples)

Hello, AdonisWW2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Royal Corsican Regiment (Naples), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support in the Napoleonic history project

Hi Adonis, I was wondering as you are an active editor with an interest in Italian Napoleonic history if you might be willing to have a look at;

Bertrand Clauzel - Wikipedia

> In 1798, Clauzel became the chief of staff to General Emmanuel de Grouchy, in which role he negotiated the abdication of the King of Sardinia in December 1798. In 1799, Clauzel was promoted to général de brigade. In this rank, he served in Italy, during which he won great distinction at the battles of Trebbia and Novi. Clauzel took command of the 4th Division under General Louis-Gabriel Suchet in 1800, and during the campaign that spring, he seized the redoubt of Melogno and participated in the attack on Monte-San-Giacomo. Months later, in December, he fought at Pozzolo.

There is only that one short paragraph about his time but I thought it might interest you / you might be a good person to ask because of your history with the kingdom of Naples and two Scillies projects.

In particular it would be great if you could,

#1 double check that I cited the correct battle sites.

#2 Any information on his role in negotiating with the King of Sardinia might be interesting / help expands the articles completeness.

#3 Any other information as to what exactly he did to win distinction at Trebbia / Novi, Melogno etc

Or suggestions on sources I might try to accomplish any of these.

Thanks, and if in future you are looking for Napoleonic era support do pop anything on my talk page

LeChatiliers Pupper (talk) 21:18, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LeChatiliers, I would be more than glad to help! I am quite active with Napoleonic research these days, and I could help with your article on Clauzel. Do you perhaps have another medium of communication that we could use - to make sending sources easier? All the best. AdonisWW2 (talk) 21:26, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would this -> Special:EmailUser/LeChatiliers Pupper not be sufficient?

The only sources related to his time in Italy that I used are all open source or at least available online - mainly Dictionnaire Biographique Des Generaux Et Amiraux De La Revolution Et De L'Empire Volume 1 : Georges Six : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive LeChatiliers Pupper (talk) 22:41, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

in particular there is this quote re his Sardinian negotiations on the FR wiki page;

Bertrand Clauzel — Wikipédia

« Les détails des moyens que j'ai employés et des difficultés de tout genre que j'ai eu à vaincre vous seront transmises par mon adjudant-général (Clauzel) qui, dans cette occurrence, m'a secondé avec zèle, énergie et dévouement. »

Which basically says clauzel did the negotiating with zeal and energy but alas no source is give LeChatiliers Pupper (talk) 22:48, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LeChatiliers,

Firstly, the battle site of Monte-San-Giacomo is cited wrong, it is actually Colla di San Giacomo in Liguria and not the town in Southern Italy.

The source of the quote from the French wikipedia page is from Lievyns, Verdot, Bégat. "Fastes de la Légion-d'honneur: biographie de tous les décorés accompagnée de l'histoire législative et réglementaire de l'ordre", Vol. 5, 1847. on Page 95, under the entry on Clauzel. You will find additional info here, although it appears it is already the main source of the entire French wikipedia page on Clauzel, as it follows it almost exactly.

Additional sources on his amicability towards the Sardinian royals and his general conduct in 1798 are:

Botta, "Storia d'Italia 1789-1814", Volume 3, pp. 298-299.

Sarrut, "Quelques Mots a Monsieur Le Maréchal Clauzel". I advise reading all of this for a clearer picture.

There is also the seminal work Gachot, "La première campagne d'Italie (1795 à 1798)", which I would advise searching for further information on the combat at Melogno.

For further biographical information, you should consider reading Clauzel's own work, "Explications du maréchal Clauzel", written after his fall from grace in 1837 where he explains his conduct in Algeria. There is anecdotal information here about his dealings with the House of Savoy.

All the best, and do not hesitate to contact me for further guidance. AdonisWW2 (talk) 13:16, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the assistance I think that really does round out most of the lighter aspects of the page

The only remaining area that might do with some expansion might be

> After his return to France, ... Until in 1806 when he was sent to the army of Naples.

Any ideas on what Clauzel got up to with the army of Naples? LeChatiliers Pupper (talk) 12:16, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think his time in naples looks to be just depot work / logistics and support type as the army got up an running but I may be wrong - it might even warrant a short addition to your article on the army im not sure. LeChatiliers Pupper (talk) 12:18, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]