User talk:82.30.146.167

November 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bebaakee, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Bebaakee. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 13:24, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Bebaakee, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ruby Allen, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please don't ignore comments. There is one explaining why her name isn't Fowler. 5 albert square (talk) 14:42, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mugdha Chaphekar‎, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 20:58, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mugdha Chaphekar. - Arjayay (talk) 15:15, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Naina Singh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 15:16, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T•C 03:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin was changed by 82.30.146.167 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85709 on 2021-03-05T01:27:57+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Na Aana Is Des Laado. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Na Aana Is Des Laado was changed by 82.30.146.167 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951137 on 2021-03-06T03:02:12+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ek Duje Ke Vaaste 2, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ek Duje Ke Vaaste 2 was changed by 82.30.146.167 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.976266 on 2021-03-07T14:58:02+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T•C 06:29, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mugdha Chaphekar. - Arjayay (talk) 15:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 20:48, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

October 2021

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mugdha Chaphekar without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 20:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mugdha Chaphekar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Vin Rana, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mugdha Chaphekar

Hi 82.30.146.167. It would seem that you have a conflict of interest with the subject of this article. Yourself and the User:Riah101 , who I assume is yourself as you're both making the same edits, have apparently been skewing the article a particular way. To be honest it appears to be PR or vanity editting, and deleting references isn't the way to go. Do you have any relationship to the subject of the article? Thanks ActivelyDisinterested (talk) 22:00, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry about that but i think her age is wrong. It’s not confirmed Riah101 (talk) 05:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.