User:SheridanFord/sandbox

Transactionalism

As Trevor J. Phillips

Delete above ---

Transactionalism is a philosophical within pragmatism where inquiry replaces traditional notions of truth. It focuses on what is happening in the constant push-and-pull between people and their ecologies, whether in classrooms, families, music and art, scientific experiments, or companies. The term "transactional" often suggests narrow, self-interested bargaining, especially in business or politics. Transactional-ism re-examines activities like teaching and learning, relationships, buying and selling, and leader-follower dynamics as parts of a complex web of mutually dependent influences shaping the intended and unintended consequences of life.

Philosophers John Dewey and Arthur F. Bentley, in their foundational work Knowing and the Known (1949), described transaction as inquiry where “existing descriptions are tentative and preliminary, allowing new descriptions of events at any stage.”

Transactionalism rejects simple dualisms (like mind-body) and fixed explanations. Instead, it views inquiry as “un-fractured observation”—observer, observing process, and observed are inseparable. Outcomes arise from whole situations, not isolated intentions.

In the late 1920s, Dewey used 'interaction' to reveal the inherent interconnectedness of organism and environment, illustrated vividly:

Humans do not merely breathe: they breathe air. They do not merely digest, but digest food. The interaction is one of dynamic exchange between and across the several aspects of the situation. It is, in fact, trans-action.

Transactionalist thought avoids rigid doctrines about learning and progress. Philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce emphasized that learning truly occurs only when we question what we think we know, staying open to new hypotheses. Every situation is both a starting point and a moving target for inquiry. To transact is not just exchange but to be shaped by—and in turn shape—evolving conditions.

The focus on “un-fractured observation” and critical reflection rejects inherited assumptions or static labels—"do not block further inquiry." Value arises not only from individual or social goals but from cumulative, iterative adjustments by individuals and communities responding to others and emergent conditions. Transactionalism offers a way to engage with and manage the complexity of social interaction, context-dependent behavior, knowledge creation, and ethical choice. It offers a framework to understand the co-evolving realities shaping complex human conditions, including health, relationships, career, leadership, politics, ethics, and spirituality.

---

Transactionalism is a philosophical approach within pragmatism focused on discovering what really happens in the constant give-and-take—the push-and-pull—between people and their ecologies, whether in a classroom, a family, a scientific experiment, or a musical jam session. The term "transactional" often brings to mind narrow, self-interested deal-making or bargaining, especially in business or politics. Transactionalism involves treating of an activity—teaching and learning, parenting, buying and selling, or leader-follower dynamics—as part of a web of mutually dependent influences shaping every interaction.

Noted philosophers John Dewey and Arthur F. Bentley, in their foundational work Knowing and the Known (1949), described transaction as a inquiry in which “existing descriptions of events are accepted only as tentative and preliminary, so that new descriptions of the aspects and phases of events, whether in widened or narrowed form, may freely be made at any and all states of the inquiry” (1949, 122).

Transactionalism rejects simple dualisms (like mind versus body) and existing explanations. Instead, it offers a way of seeing inquiry as “un-fractured observation”—where the observer, the process of observing, and the observed are all bound together, resisting separation into discrete or isolated parts. This means that the whole situation, and not just a discrete intention or goal, shapes the outcome.

In the late 1920s, Dewey used the term 'interaction' to reveal the inherent interconnectedness of an organism and its environment, illustrated in a vivid example:

Humans do not merely breathe: they breathe air. They do not merely digest, but digest food.

A transactionalist avoids rigid doctrines about how learning, knowing, and progress must occur. As Dewey and Charles Sanders Peirce emphasized, learning only truly happens if we are ready to question what we think we know, keeping the road open to further investigation and new hypotheses. Every situation is a starting point; every solution is a moving target for further inquiry. To transact is not just to exchange with others but to be shaped by—and in turn shape—the evolving conditions of any situation.

The focus is on “un-fractured observation” and continuous critical reflection, rejecting inherited assumptions, prior explanations, or static labels—"do not block the road of further inquiry." (Phillips) What is valuable arises not only from individual goals or social structures but from cumulative, iterative adjustments by individuals and communities responding to other people and emerging situations. Transactionalism offers a way to engage with, understand, and manage the inherent complexity of social interaction and exchange considering context-dependent human behavior, knowledge creation, and ethical decision-making.

The philosophical approach has been applied across diverse fields including cognitive science, cultural anthropology, educational philosophy, leadership studies, occupational science, political science, quantum mechanics, social psychology, and zoology. It offers a framework for understanding co-constituted, evolving realities of complex human conditions such as health, relationships, career, leadership, politics, ethics, and spirituality.

Put elsewhere:

Peirce wrote: “In order to learn you must want to learn, and in so desiring not be satisfied with what you already incline to think” (citation).

In traditional philosophy, agency is typically conceived as residing solely within the individual—an autonomous actor capable of decisions and actions affecting an outside environment. Here, agency refers to the capacity to act, decide, and influence; the environment comprises physical, social, and ecological surroundings within which agents operate. Transactionalism challenges this strict division, emphasizing that one cannot fully understand an agent’s actions without the environment contextualizing them, nor comprehend the environment without recognizing embedded agents. Inquiry into transaction facilitates managing the complex interplay of agents and environments.

The approach demands attentiveness to the intertwined, evolving conditions shaping each transaction, enabling inquiry that is both practically grounded and ethically responsive.

---

Transactionalism is a philosophical approach within pragmatism focused on discovering what really happens in the constant give-and-take—the push-and-pull—between people and their ecologies, whether in a classroom, a family, a scientific experiment, or a musical jam session. The term "transactional" often brings to mind narrow, self-interested deal-making or bargaining, especially in business or politics. But transactionalism goes deeper: it invites careful inquiry into any activity—teaching and learning, parenting, buying and selling, or leader-follower dynamics—treating each as part of a web of mutually dependent influences shaping every interaction.

Noted philosophers John Dewey and Arthur F. Bentley, in their foundational work Knowing and the Known (1949), described transaction as a type of inquiry in which “existing descriptions of events are accepted only as tentative and preliminary, so that new descriptions of the aspects and phases of events, whether in widened or narrowed form, may freely be made at any and all states of the inquiry” (1949, 122).

Transactionalism rejects classic dualisms (like mind versus body) and simple or existing explanations. Instead, it offers a way of seeing inquiry as “un-fractured observation”—where the observer, the process of observing, and the observed are all bound together, resisting separation into discrete or isolated parts. This means that the whole situation, and not just an isolated intention or goal, shapes the outcome.

In the late 1920s, Dewey used “interaction” to convey a dynamic exchange among multiple interconnected aspects of an exchange between organism and environment. He illustrated this with a vivid example:

Humans do not merely breathe: they breathe air. They do not merely digest, but digest food. The interaction is one of dynamic exchange between and across the several aspects of the situation. It is, in fact, trans-action.

The transactionalist approach “lets observation run free”—avoiding rigid doctrines about how learning, knowing, and progress must happen. Peirce wrote: “In order to learn you must want to learn, and in so desiring not be satisfied with what you already incline to think” (citation). As Dewey and Peirce emphasized, learning only truly happens if we are ready to question what we think we know, keeping the road open to further investigation and new hypotheses. Every situation is a moving target; every solution is a starting point for further inquiry.

To transact is not just to exchange with others, but to be shaped by, and in turn to shape, the evolving conditions of any situation; organism and environment, knower and known, action and context all occur “together-at-once” as part of a pattern of “controlled inquiry” into living a good life.

The focus is on “un-fractured observation” and continuous, critical reflection, so that inherited assumptions, prior explanations, or static labels never block the road of further inquiry. What is valuable or meaningful arises not only from individual goals or the structure of society, but from the cumulative, iterative adjustments of individuals and communities to the emerging situation at hand.

In traditional philosophy, agency is typically understood as residing solely “inside” a person or organism—seen as independent, self-contained actors capable of making choices that affect an “outside” environment. Here, agency refers to the capacity of individuals or organisms to act, make decisions, and exert influence. Environment refers to the external context or surroundings—physical, social, and ecological—within which those agents operate. Transactionalism challenges this strict separation by emphasizing that one cannot fully understand an agent’s actions outside of the environment in which those actions occur, nor comprehend the environment without recognizing the agents active within it. Inquiry into a transaction thus provides a means to engage with, control, or manage the complex interplay between agents and their environments.

Transactionalism finds applications across fields including educational philosophy, social psychology, cultural anthropology, political science, occupational science, cognitive science, zoology, quantum mechanics, and leadership studies. Transactionalism offers a comprehensive framework for understanding the co-constituted, evolving realities of complex human conditions such as health, relationships, career, leadership, politics, ethics, and spirituality.

---

Transactionalism is a philosophical approach within pragmatism focused on discovering what really happens in the constant give-and-take—the push-and-pull—between people and their ecologies, whether in a classroom, a family, a scientific experiment, or a musical jam session. The term "transactional" often brings to mind narrow, self-interested deal-making or bargaining, especially in business or politics. But transactionalism goes deeper: it invites careful inquiry into any activity—teaching and learning, parenting, buying and selling, or leader-follower dynamics—treating each as part of a web of mutually dependent influences shaping every interaction.

Noted philosophers John Dewey and Arthur F. Bentley, in their foundational work Knowing and the Known (1949), described transaction as a type of inquiry in which “existing descriptions of events are accepted only as tentative and preliminary, so that new descriptions of the aspects and phases of events, whether in widened or narrowed form, may freely be made at any and all states of the inquiry” (1949, 122).

Transactionalism rejects classic dualisms (like mind versus body) and simple or existing explanations. Instead, it offers a way of seeing inquiry as “un-fractured observation”—where the observer, the process of observing (observer bias), and the observed are all bound together, resisting separation into discrete or isolated parts. This means that the whole situation, and not just an isolated intention or goal, shapes the outcome.

In the late 1920s, Dewey used “interaction” to convey a dynamic exchange among multiple interconnected aspects of an exchange between organism and environment. He illustrated this with a vivid example:

Humans do not merely breathe: they breathe air. They do not merely digest, but digest food. The interaction is one of dynamic exchange between and across the several aspects of the situation. It is, in fact, trans-action.

The transactionalist approach “lets observation run free”—avoiding rigid doctrines about how learning, knowing, and progress must happen—"In order to learn you must want to learn, and in so desiring not be satisfied with what you already incline to think" (Peirce date). As Dewey and Peirce emphasized, learning only truly happens if we are ready to question what we think we know, keeping the road open to further investigation and new hypotheses. Every situation is a moving target; every solution is a starting point for further inquiry.

To transact is not just to exchange with others, but to be shaped by, and in turn to shape, the evolving conditions of any situation—organism and environment, knower and known, action and context all occur “together-at-once” as part of an pattern of "controlled inquiry" into living a good life.

The focus is on “un-fractured observation” and continuous, critical reflection, so that inherited assumptions, prior explanations, or static labels never block the road of further inquiry. What is valuable or meaningful arises not only from individual goals or the structure of society, but from the cumulative, iterative adjustments of individuals and communities to the emerging situation at hand.

This approach aims to dissolve the boundaries between subject and object, inner and outer, or agency and environment. It finds applications across fields including educational philosophy, social psychology, cultural anthropology, political science, occupational science, cognitive science, zoology, quantum mechanics, and leadership studies. Transactionalism offers a comprehensive framework for understanding the co-constituted and evolving realities of complex human conditions like health, relationships, career, leadership, politics, ethics, and spirituality.

---

Noted philosopher John Dewey and Arthur F. Bentley’s foundational work, Knowing and the Known(1949) described transaction as a type of inquiry in which "existing descriptions of events are accepted only as tentative and preliminary, so that new descriptions of the aspects and phases of events, whether in widened or narrowed form, may freely be made at any and all states of the inquiry" (1949, 122). Transactionalism rejects classic dualisms (like mind versus body) and simple or existing explanations. Instead, it offers a way of seeing inquiry as “un-fractured observation”—where the observer, the process of observing (observer bias), and the observed are all bound together, resisting separation into discrete or isolated parts. Aspects of the whole situation matter in determining outcomes not just the intention or goal.

In the late 1920s, Dewey used "interaction" to convey a dynamic exchange among multiple interconnected aspects of an exchange between organism and its environment. He illustrated this with a vivid example:

Humans do not merely breathe: they breathe air. They do not merely digest, but digest food. The interaction is one of dynamic exchange between and across the several aspects of the situation. It is, in fact, trans-action.

The transactionalist approach “lets observation run free”—avoiding rigid doctrines about how learning, knowing, and progress must happen. As Dewey and Peirce emphasized, learning only truly happens if we’re ready to question what we think we know, keeping the road open to further investigation and new hypotheses. Every situation is a moving target; every solution is a starting point for further inquiry.

Building on Dewey and Arthur F. Bentley’s foundational work (1949), transactionalism emphasizes the inseparability of persons and their environments, conceived together as an “organism-environment.” This approach rejects many dualistic separations—not only mind versus body, but also oversimplifications in both inquiry and lived experience. It offers a framework of “un-fractured observation” in which an individual situates any situation within the broader context in which they act.

This emergent, process-oriented framework emphasizes that evaluating human expectations and experience involves more than intentions or stated goals. It requires attending to individual past experiences, expectations, ideals, and outcomes to navigate complex, often chaotic situations such as teamwork. Transactionalism highlights the importance of anticipating how situations evolve through iterative cycles of inquiry. A "transactional" mindset—distinct from interactional or self-actional perspectives (discussed below)—shifts how humans engage with and improve situations that are never truly fixed or isolated.

Transactionalism is a comprehensive framework for understanding the co-constituted and evolving realities of complex human conditions like health, relationships, career, leadership, politics, ethics, and spirituality.

Earlier edit:

In transactionalism, human interactions are understood as reciprocal and co-constitutive processes in which individuals and their environments continuously shape one another. A transaction is not treated as a simple exchange between separate entities but as an ongoing cycle of actions and responses embedded within broader conditions of life such as health, work, education, or ethics. Rather than focusing solely on discrete goals or outcomes, the transactional perspective emphasizes the ways in which these interlocking conditions influence and constrain both personal and social development.

This approach reflects Dewey and Bentley’s notion of an "un-fractured observation" of life as an "organism-environment," a framework in which the individual cannot be separated from the context in which they act. The emphasis is on unfractured observation of lived experience, where outcomes are framed as arising from prior causes and articulated ends across an entire field of activity rather than from individual intention alone. Some scholars have drawn parallels between this orientation and Hannah Arendt’s conception of the human as a "political animal" (zoon politikon), in which labor, work, play, and action are embedded in shared conditions of life and not reducible to abstract aspiration or isolated goals.

Within this framework, consequences and outcomes regarding living itself, as a process of creating and structuring one’s environment, is central to the evaluation of any human endeavor or activity. Transactions are not only shaped by one's intention but also by the condition of one's biology, the circumstances of one's personal history, social context, and the limited resources available within a given situation. These limited resources may be tangible, such as tools and settings, or intangible, such as time and meaning, as well as the resources of the roles and personalities of other participants in a situation or social exchange.

Beyond our conscious awareness, three aspects of experience—the observer, the process of observing, and the thing observed in a situation—are all "affected by whatever merits or defects [the organism-environment] may prove to have when it is judged."

Human satisfaction, therefore, is associated with both physiological conditions such as health and disease and with broader ecological and social environments, including shared norms, values, and practical capacities for action. In this sense, transactionalism has been described as a method of "controlled inquiry" into the complex interplay of conditions within any situation that shape the experience as well as expectations of living in an ever-changing body and external environment. This is what transactionalists describe as “trans-acting”: the ongoing cycle of interaction in which persons and environments shape one another through interdependent processes of action and response.

Overview

In their 1949 book Knowing and the Known, transactionalists John Dewey and Arthur Bentley explained that they were "willing under hypothesis to treat all [human] behavings, including [their] most advanced knowings, as activities not of [them]self alone, nor even as primarily [theirs], but as processes of the full situation of organism-environment."

John Dewey used the term "trans-action" to "describe the process of knowing as something that involves the full situation of organism-environment, not a mere inter-action between two independent entities, e.g., the observer and the object observed." A "trans-action" (or simply a "transaction") rests upon the recognition that subject (the observer) and object (the observed) are inseparable; "Instead, observer and observed are held in close organization. Nor is there any radical separation between that which is named and the naming." A knower (as "subject") and what they know (as "object" that may be human, tangible, or intangible) are inseparable and must be understood as inseparable to live a truly satisfying life.

Dewey and Bentley distinguished the "trans-actional" point of view (as opposed to a "self-actional" or "inter-actional" one) in their preface:

The transactional is in fact that point of view which systematically proceeds upon the ground that knowing is co-operative and as such is integral with communication. By its own processes it is allied with the postulational. It demands that statements be made as descriptions of events in terms of durations in time and areas in space. It excludes assertions of fixity and attempts to impose them. It installs openness and flexibility in the very process of knowing. It treats knowledge as itself inquiry—as a goal within inquiry, not as a terminus outside or beyond inquiry.

The metaphysics and epistemology of living a satisfactory life begins with the hypothesis that man is an "organism-environment" solving problems in and, through a necessary exchange with others. Therefore, attention must always be paid to organizing acts as aspects or entities within a reciprocal, co-constitutive, and ethical exchange, whether it be in co-operative buying and selling; teaching and learning; marital trans-actions; or in any social situation where human beings engage one another.

Victor Navone or Alien Song

Born November 2, 1970 in San Diego.

Alien Song was an early viral hit via email.

I began teaching myself character animation on my spare time, because it looked like fun and the software was becoming cheaper and more accessible.  I was inspired by the movies Toy Story and A Bug's Life, and more importantly by all the other amateur animators I was starting to see on the internet.  I grabbed a copy of Animation: Master and started reading and researching everything I could about animation and doing test exercises.  My third animation test, a lip-synch test called "Alien Song", became a viral hit on the internet.

In December of 1999 I was contacted by Pixar Animation Studios (the president had received a copy of "Alien Song" by email) and I have worked there ever since March of 2000.  “Monsters, Inc.” was my first feature project at the studio and I have worked on almost every Pixar feature film since then, including “Finding Nemo,” “The Incredibles,” “Cars,” “WALL•E,” (for which I won an award from the Visual Effects Society) “Toy Story 3,” “Cars 2,” (for which I was a Directing Animator) “Brave,” and "Monsters University".

He is cited several times under notable articles including for a handful of major awards for editing.

Category:Producers

Dan Burrus

1. TO DO
   1. Converting the red link for the Anticipatory Business Model into an article.
   2. Expanding the Hard Trend™ Methodology and Anticipatory Business Model sections in the Burrus WP article. Based on online reviews or blogs like here and here.
   3. Search for other examples to cite for the mainspace of that article.
   4. Developing an article on the Anticipatory Organization Model concept based on citations on Google Scholar and the book itself
      1. Find 3 citations in reputable sources make a case for notability on WP.
      2. Reference reviews here and here and here and here.
      3. Search for other book reviews to cite and incorporate.
      4. Embed Daniel Burrus and "Anticipatory Business Model" into the strategic planning WP article.
      5. Create a book article for The Anticipatory Organization book
2. Anticipatory Organization Method (stub article)
   1. Verify, define, detail the problem, give solution or alternative to the problem
      1. Generate all possible solutions
      2. Generate objective assessment criteria
      3. Choose the best solution generated
      4. Implement the preferred alternative
      5. Monitor and evaluate outcomes and results
   2. Requirements and limitation
      

The Anticipatory Organization (book)

References: Noteworthy citations and sources.

http://www.businessworld.in/article/Book-Review-The-Anticipatory-Organization-Turn-Disruption-and-Change-into-Opportunity-and-Advantage/20-03-2018-144042/

New book cites Burrus: 60 Leaders on Innovation

Afrika Bambaataa & The Universal Zulu Nation Scandal

Sources:

https://www.google.com/search?q=Savage+accused+Afrika+Bambaataa&oq=Savage+accused+Afrika+Bambaataa&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQIRigATIHCAIQIRigATIHCAMQIRigATIHCAQQIRigATIHCAUQIRigATIHCAYQIRirAtIBBzc2M2owajeoAgCwAgA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Add to See Also section below R Kelly, Bill Cosby, Russell Simmon, and Afrika Bam pages

R. Kelly sexual abuse cases