This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cricket, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cricket articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
I would like to suggest moving the title of this article to simply Titwood, as the Citylets part of the name is merely a sponsor's label applied to the ground on an infrequent basis — it applies to Scotland matches on the ground only. Such a move would bring this article in to line with other venues, such as The Grange and Ayr which are in fact part of the same sponsorship deal with Citylets. In fact, I would also point to The Oval for a cricketing precedent where the article name ignores the sponsor's names being tacked on.
Speaking more generally, while sponsored names will rightly be used for new sporting venues with no other official title, such as the Emirates Stadium , or possibly when a traditional name has been replaced rather than added to (SWALEC Stadium or the excruciating KitKat Crescent!), in this sort of instance I think it would be preferable to stick with more recognisable, traditional names. Thoughts?? Jellyman (talk) 14:57, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]