Talk:The Isaias Group
| This article was nominated for deletion on 7 January 2020. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contested deletion
[edit]This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (the Isaias Group was one of the most important business conglomerates in Ecuador's history. It's no longer active as a holding, but its previous existence should be acknowledged) --Ally Ollins (talk) 18:05, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Undisclosed paid edits
[edit]I have added an {{undisclosed paid}} tag to this article because of extensive editing by a UPE sockfarm, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Frost joyce for evidence. Users relevant to this page include: Francisco Fredeye (talk · contribs) The article will need a thorough review ensuring notability, due weight, neutral language, and use of reliable sources before the tag is removed. MarioGom (talk) 22:49, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Concern Regarding Due Weight in Da Vinci Biosciences Section
[edit]I would like to request editorial review regarding the section referencing Da Vinci Biosciences and DV Biologics. While the cited sources verify that legal proceedings existed, the current wording appears to place disproportionate emphasis on a single historical controversy within an article about a broader business group. Per Wikipedia policies on due weight (WP:UNDUE) and biographies of living persons (WP:BLP), contentious material should be presented with careful proportionality, neutral framing, and encyclopedic balance. The current paragraph: focuses extensively on allegations, includes highly sensitive language, names multiple living individuals, and occupies a level of prominence that may exceed its long-term encyclopedic relevance within the overall context of The Isaias Group. I would suggest either: significantly reducing the section, rewriting it in a more neutral and concise manner, or evaluating whether this level of detail belongs in a separate article specifically about the legal case rather than the main corporate article. Requesting input from uninvolved editors regarding proportionality and compliance with WP:UNDUE and WP:BLP. MarcosVega45 (talk) 13:32, 28 May 2026 (UTC)