Talk:The Daily Beast

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Davemaney (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Daily Beast article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

The daily caller listed as right wing, the daily beast not listed as left wing

Totally WP:NPOV lol 2603:6011:59F0:21E0:A0EE:1EBD:C136:6901 (talk) 11:55, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article has quotes from reliable sources in the 'Editorial stance' section. Have any you'd like to suggest we add, to support your own view (or otherwise)? 109.255.211.6 (talk) 20:25, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Its left-wing stance should be in the first sentence of the lead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2025-39973-86 (talk) 07:50, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed.

Sources: ^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4] – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 09:20, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

‘Avoid posts…

… that might offend any group.’

Now there’s a formula for hard-hitting journalism. ~2026-22527-63 (talk) 21:39, 23 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://ground.news/interest/the-daily-beast

[2] ttps://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-beast/

[3] ttps://app.adfontesmedia.com/chart/interactive

[4] ttps://www.allsides.com/news-source/daily-beast-media-bias

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]